Took a bit of annoying diffing, but your revision is now merged back into the article. -- Cybercobra (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, sure, do whatever. My only concern is that the formatting not get lost like last time. Anyone can remove a tag if they think it's no longer applicable, it's a very informal system. -- Cybercobra (talk) 09:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
You can remove the tag if you think it's no longer applicable. Like I said, the system of problem tags (such as the copyediting/grammar one) is very informal. -- Cybercobra (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Took a bit of annoying diffing, but your revision is now merged back into the article. -- Cybercobra (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, sure, do whatever. My only concern is that the formatting not get lost like last time. Anyone can remove a tag if they think it's no longer applicable, it's a very informal system. -- Cybercobra (talk) 09:25, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
You can remove the tag if you think it's no longer applicable. Like I said, the system of problem tags (such as the copyediting/grammar one) is very informal. -- Cybercobra (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2010 (UTC)