![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hello, I just wanted to let you know of a situation that is developing at the article Battle of Košare at which you were involved in the past. In the past months, editor Durraz0 has been removing referenced info, along with its sources, and introducing information without providing any sources (violation of OR guideline) or even leaving information that is contrary to the cited references. After a time, the article was stabilized for a few weeks, after a few other editors who were also making unsourced POV edits and constantly edit warring were blocked. However, recently, Durraz0 has once again been making the same edits, making full reverts without any explanation in the edit summary. Please feel free to verify how unconstructive the edits were yourself [1] [2]. The nature of the edits I think would have to warrant some attention to the changes being made at the article so it would stay within Wikipedia's guidelines on verifiability. In case Durraz0 does at one point decide to use the talk page for a discussion (he has not up to this point), you could also engage in that discussion and maybe propose a compromise that could be reached to improve the article. Cheers and have a Happy New Year! EkoGraf ( talk) 13:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I agree with your revert now seeing you explanation of image overkill which I missed. Sorry about that. But how was my argument about image appropriateness and comparing other articles with far more young viewer unfriendly images? You never really refuted my point on that. I am fine with your revert considering your secondary reasoning. But I don’t see a skull to be as traumatic to images in other war articles. I know “whataboutism” is not an argument itself but I feel precedents are fair to bring up. Heck even in history books when I was a kid in school, there were far more gruesome images.
If you could explain so that in the future I understand better it would be appreciated. As I am still learning the ropes. As the first part of your diff comes across dismissive and not really countering my argument. I mean this respectfully not passive aggressively. Cheers. OyMosby ( talk) 19:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko, in the article it says “Bukovac was the court painter for Obrenović dynasty and Karađorđević dynasty.” Though this lacks a source. I noticed in thebkwad you added another dynasty he did work for but this was missing in the body so didn’t know. Should we add that dynasty to the body? Also can you help located citation. I don’t doubt it but still want to add a source to avoid future people coming in causing problems. I added Natalie of Serbia painting to the infobox as from what I see he won an honor from the state by the court for it. Thanks. OyMosby ( talk) 18:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
This here is a prime example of why people should be forced to make an account in order to edit Wikipedia. Not to mention for privacy and safety reasons, people’s IPs shouldn’t be on display. I don’t know why Wikipedia doesn’t have this as a rule. Many websites require registration. Nothing prevents a person from doing so. This IP isn’t static and is a bane on what is already a hot area of Wikipedia. Thoughts? OyMosby ( talk) 20:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Also wanted to tap on the topic of Art. I’m very into photography and photos and paintings. Also learning in the past year of South Slavic Composers and Painters. So if you ever need a second pair of eyes or help do not hesitate to call on me. Have a happy and healthy new year to you and your family. May this year be better than the last.... OyMosby ( talk) 16:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC) |
I didn’t mean DAI is illegitimate as an existing source. But wasn’t it established ad nauseam on multiple talk pages that the problem is it’s primary source and extremely old? WP:PRIMARY and WP:AGEMATTERS? It would be like using quotes from an interview of here-say and using it as a factoid. Wouldn’t that make it not an RS sourcing? Unless I’m missing the bigger picture here? I am open to self-reverting if it can be explained that way the burden of revert isn’t on your end. .Cheers. OyMosby ( talk) 22:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Greetings you are probably sick of it but I think that discussion on Viseslav of Serbia is stale, I would ask you if you have time to check the information regarding Duklja and what Fine writes about it. It is on page 202. and 225 (I provided the quotes on TP) but maybe I am wrong. I would also like if Sorabino and Amanuensis Balkanicus examine the source because I think it is obvious what Fine says and it is not misused. Here is the book [ [6]] and sorry for disturbing you. Theonewithreason ( talk). 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko,
Thanks for the improvements to the Serbian literature template. I wanted to ask your thoughts on the inclusion of Milovan Đilas. He was more of someone with published books rather than someone known for their literature. I would not consider him a književnik.
What are your thoughts on this matter? All the best. – PidgeCopetti ( talk) 12:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
It would be nice if someone created an article for this movie. [7] Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 15:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[ [8]]
Empathizing and enabling the guy attacking me and disregarding others while ignoring RS and using IPs and accounts to get around page locks. I’m quite surpised to see this, Sadko. We shouldn’t condone such behavior as you know we have enough of that already in the Balkan topic areas.
[ individual goes after me and calls others liars and not listening]
“ dishonest arguments from clearly overemotional users who might straight out ignore what other users say”
This individual described themselves. I even responded to Peacemaker saying you likely missed his quotes which turned out to be the case with his over the top response.
I am disappointed to see you approve of and condone such behavior. Stating “as you've witnessed.” Implying everyone else was complicit.. This person who editwarred against multiple editors. Ignored RS and insulted users in absences of explaining why the sources Peacemaker brought were wrong.
Again people will notice this. And I would suggest removing or rephrasing your comment to them on their page telling them to also not get so aggressive as we all can admit we have our episodes. As so far their edits haven’t been positive. They received warnings in multiples. We should help them improve their methods. Not take sides for the sake of it.
Make of it what you will, Sadko. Regards, OyMosby ( talk) 20:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
How is it POV? Did you see the source i sent you with the letter from Comoros? What more do you want?
Albaniakosova14 (
talk)
13:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko, you had made the edit Here so figured you would be best to ask. What is the interpretation of “ Ban on marriage to minor degrees of relationship imposed by the Roman Catholic Church was met with heavy criticism in the Croatian society of the time,”. Th source says it was imposed the the Byzantines instead. And what is meant by minor degrees of relationship? Are they talking about intermarriage? It’s worded in such a strange way in the book that I don’t know if marriage is meant literally, or combining church traditions. Thanks. OyMosby ( talk) 21:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko!
Do you think Mirjana Bobić Mojsilović would be a good fit for the Serbian literature template?
All the best! PidgeCopetti ( talk) 00:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering whether you have any information regarding Stevan Labudović (I am particularly interested in his early years), as I believe he's notable and deserves an article. Thanks. M.Bitton ( talk) 17:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
| Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Milan Borjan at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Kncny11 ( talk) 01:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC) |
You consistently vandalize Serbian pages, deny edits from credible sources by the largest and most credible Holocaust memorial in the world, why are you making causing issues that you know are lies? Tvrtko Kotromanic ( talk) 20:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Serbian literature has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
There are a few sections in the article that do not have citations. I did not bother to tag them since they're fairly easy to spot. I quickly found and added a few in the Contemporary Literature section.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikšić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Popovo.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Sadko,
Do you have a Wiki email? I want to address a private matter if you are willing. Thanks OyMosby ( talk) 02:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sadko, I wanted to give you an update about the situation at the Battle of Košare. User Durraz0 and me managed to engage in a proper discussion at the talk page and we found a compromise solution for the article satisfactory for both sides and implemented it, while he admitted to making a mistake before when he just copy-pasted the older version of the article, removing references and so on, and said he would work on correcting himself in the future in this regard. Everything was then fine for a few weeks until editor Adhurim Jakupi, that was previously blocked three times for edit warring at Kosare and Pastrik battle articles, showed up and once again did a blanket revert of the text in the article (removing the compromise wording, removing sources and inserting unsourced text) without any edit summary. I reinstated the discussed-on compromise version, making a note of this in the edit summary and asking Adhurim Jakupi to engage at the talk page. I am guessing, based on his past behavior, that Adhurim Jakupi will just simply revert me first chance he gets and will not engage at the talk page. Like before, any help you could provide in reaching a solution at the article would be appreciated. Cheers! EkoGraf ( talk) 18:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Serbian films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bojan Dimitrijević, Dragan Jovanović and Goran Jevtić.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi @ Sadko:, i found the diffs of the user User:SerVasi very similar to User:Miki Filigranski (another sockpuppet of User:Crovata), and i suspect that is another sockpuppet, what do you thing?... John L. Booth ( talk) 02:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Sadko. Thank you. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 01:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Zdravo! I am really glad that you like my creation of the Aleksandar Mašin article. I am even more glad to see that, judging by userboxes on your user page, we apparently have some common points in our worldviews... I am looking forward to hear from you again, to stay in contact and to possibly work together in the future. Sincerely, — Sundostund ( talk) 17:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I would be curious to know what you think about this edit. — Biruitorul Talk 17:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
indefinite topic ban from WP:ARBEE
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at EE#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 01:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Serbian cinema has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 18:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, Sadko--I know you are not allowed to edit/discuss/etc. these matters, and I feel for you, but there is one thing you can do for me and for Wikipedia: without even saying anything about the subject matter, I need you to tell me which editor would be helpful in getting this article in better shape than it is. I did about all I can do. If you're going to get out from this topic ban, and I assume you will try in a couple months, your case will be strengthened by showing you are in control of things and you have the best interests of the project at heart. So here's one opportunity for you--just give me the name of a good-faith editor who knows their history. As an admin, one who's done some work in various controversial areas, I can guarantee you that answering me will not violate your ban as long as you just give me a name; we're not discussing anything or talking about any content. Just to make sure this is above board, I'm pinging Bishonen and Guerillero. Thanks, and take care, Drmies ( talk) 23:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko. Haven’t spoken to you in a while and wanted to see how you are doing? Not sure if you live in Serbia or have family there. How are things there? Has vaccine administration begun? Hope all is good given COVID. We Yanks are slowly getting the hang of running a country a century and a half later. Learning the hard way through growing pains. :/ Balkans seemed to be more on top of things. Which is good to see!
Also, wanted to see with you if you would be interested in collaborating on some Non-Balkan articles? I reached mental burn-out and don’t have time to deal with reverts and drama as I am sure you too tire of that shit. I first came to Wikipedia not to dedicate time exclusively to that but a hobby to edit Wikipedia in general. But got preoccupied. And given your temporary edit restrictions this could be good rep work for when you want to appeal. Especially if they see us two work well together. Just a thought. Let me know by pinging me here. Stay safe. Regards OyMosby ( talk) 15:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Culture of Serbia has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I actually feel the article's style is not too bad. I did have to remove some repetitive material. The two biggest problems with the article are that sections of it are out of date and many statements lack citations. I did not check, but I suspect that various contributors brought sentences from the "main" into the sections of this one. If this is the case, the citations used in the main article could be used in this one. If not, citations will have to be found elsewhere.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 21:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko, hope all is well, I was reading through this article and noticed that Bosnina is mentioned twice in the 2011 Language statistics. I don't have access to the census so I am just forwarding it to you since you are an active editor from this region.
-- James Richards ( talk) 13:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Not Wiki related. I see you are a fellow vegetarian, Fire Fly and art and photography lover. I’m quite into photography myself. Any tips on good sources or websites for learning photography and camera equipment? I’m still a bit of an amateur myself. Hadn’t come across other editors before that share a similar hobby. Also as a rambunctious Yankee, I agree, the UN should leave the US and be in Brussels. Not to mention, not sure if you have been there, the building is literally falling apart lol. Metaphorical in a way. As UN current to me means Useless Nations as I don’t feel enough progress is made by the organization. My country is heavily to blame. Guess we have a lot in common interestingly. Just wanted to humanize us two as it is sterile talking to strangers through emotionless text as I realize more and more. Hope you are doing well. Warm regards. OyMosby ( talk) 16:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dara Fanka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 21:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
All the best wishes to you, your family and friends !!! Theonewithreason ( talk) 31.December 2021 (UTC)
Youve been in the naughty corner for so long i even thought about recommending you for a reduced sentence as i know you enjoy this but it seems like youre the same old dog. Hairli. SerVasi ( talk) 18:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Bro, how are you doing? Montenegro wiki has many problems currently, Terrible that you can not help contribute here anymore. Surix321 ( talk) 01:19, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Hello, I just wanted to let you know of a situation that is developing at the article Battle of Košare at which you were involved in the past. In the past months, editor Durraz0 has been removing referenced info, along with its sources, and introducing information without providing any sources (violation of OR guideline) or even leaving information that is contrary to the cited references. After a time, the article was stabilized for a few weeks, after a few other editors who were also making unsourced POV edits and constantly edit warring were blocked. However, recently, Durraz0 has once again been making the same edits, making full reverts without any explanation in the edit summary. Please feel free to verify how unconstructive the edits were yourself [1] [2]. The nature of the edits I think would have to warrant some attention to the changes being made at the article so it would stay within Wikipedia's guidelines on verifiability. In case Durraz0 does at one point decide to use the talk page for a discussion (he has not up to this point), you could also engage in that discussion and maybe propose a compromise that could be reached to improve the article. Cheers and have a Happy New Year! EkoGraf ( talk) 13:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
I agree with your revert now seeing you explanation of image overkill which I missed. Sorry about that. But how was my argument about image appropriateness and comparing other articles with far more young viewer unfriendly images? You never really refuted my point on that. I am fine with your revert considering your secondary reasoning. But I don’t see a skull to be as traumatic to images in other war articles. I know “whataboutism” is not an argument itself but I feel precedents are fair to bring up. Heck even in history books when I was a kid in school, there were far more gruesome images.
If you could explain so that in the future I understand better it would be appreciated. As I am still learning the ropes. As the first part of your diff comes across dismissive and not really countering my argument. I mean this respectfully not passive aggressively. Cheers. OyMosby ( talk) 19:36, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko, in the article it says “Bukovac was the court painter for Obrenović dynasty and Karađorđević dynasty.” Though this lacks a source. I noticed in thebkwad you added another dynasty he did work for but this was missing in the body so didn’t know. Should we add that dynasty to the body? Also can you help located citation. I don’t doubt it but still want to add a source to avoid future people coming in causing problems. I added Natalie of Serbia painting to the infobox as from what I see he won an honor from the state by the court for it. Thanks. OyMosby ( talk) 18:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
This here is a prime example of why people should be forced to make an account in order to edit Wikipedia. Not to mention for privacy and safety reasons, people’s IPs shouldn’t be on display. I don’t know why Wikipedia doesn’t have this as a rule. Many websites require registration. Nothing prevents a person from doing so. This IP isn’t static and is a bane on what is already a hot area of Wikipedia. Thoughts? OyMosby ( talk) 20:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Also wanted to tap on the topic of Art. I’m very into photography and photos and paintings. Also learning in the past year of South Slavic Composers and Painters. So if you ever need a second pair of eyes or help do not hesitate to call on me. Have a happy and healthy new year to you and your family. May this year be better than the last.... OyMosby ( talk) 16:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC) |
I didn’t mean DAI is illegitimate as an existing source. But wasn’t it established ad nauseam on multiple talk pages that the problem is it’s primary source and extremely old? WP:PRIMARY and WP:AGEMATTERS? It would be like using quotes from an interview of here-say and using it as a factoid. Wouldn’t that make it not an RS sourcing? Unless I’m missing the bigger picture here? I am open to self-reverting if it can be explained that way the burden of revert isn’t on your end. .Cheers. OyMosby ( talk) 22:51, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Greetings you are probably sick of it but I think that discussion on Viseslav of Serbia is stale, I would ask you if you have time to check the information regarding Duklja and what Fine writes about it. It is on page 202. and 225 (I provided the quotes on TP) but maybe I am wrong. I would also like if Sorabino and Amanuensis Balkanicus examine the source because I think it is obvious what Fine says and it is not misused. Here is the book [ [6]] and sorry for disturbing you. Theonewithreason ( talk). 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko,
Thanks for the improvements to the Serbian literature template. I wanted to ask your thoughts on the inclusion of Milovan Đilas. He was more of someone with published books rather than someone known for their literature. I would not consider him a književnik.
What are your thoughts on this matter? All the best. – PidgeCopetti ( talk) 12:52, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
It would be nice if someone created an article for this movie. [7] Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 15:57, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[ [8]]
Empathizing and enabling the guy attacking me and disregarding others while ignoring RS and using IPs and accounts to get around page locks. I’m quite surpised to see this, Sadko. We shouldn’t condone such behavior as you know we have enough of that already in the Balkan topic areas.
[ individual goes after me and calls others liars and not listening]
“ dishonest arguments from clearly overemotional users who might straight out ignore what other users say”
This individual described themselves. I even responded to Peacemaker saying you likely missed his quotes which turned out to be the case with his over the top response.
I am disappointed to see you approve of and condone such behavior. Stating “as you've witnessed.” Implying everyone else was complicit.. This person who editwarred against multiple editors. Ignored RS and insulted users in absences of explaining why the sources Peacemaker brought were wrong.
Again people will notice this. And I would suggest removing or rephrasing your comment to them on their page telling them to also not get so aggressive as we all can admit we have our episodes. As so far their edits haven’t been positive. They received warnings in multiples. We should help them improve their methods. Not take sides for the sake of it.
Make of it what you will, Sadko. Regards, OyMosby ( talk) 20:45, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
How is it POV? Did you see the source i sent you with the letter from Comoros? What more do you want?
Albaniakosova14 (
talk)
13:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko, you had made the edit Here so figured you would be best to ask. What is the interpretation of “ Ban on marriage to minor degrees of relationship imposed by the Roman Catholic Church was met with heavy criticism in the Croatian society of the time,”. Th source says it was imposed the the Byzantines instead. And what is meant by minor degrees of relationship? Are they talking about intermarriage? It’s worded in such a strange way in the book that I don’t know if marriage is meant literally, or combining church traditions. Thanks. OyMosby ( talk) 21:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko!
Do you think Mirjana Bobić Mojsilović would be a good fit for the Serbian literature template?
All the best! PidgeCopetti ( talk) 00:59, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering whether you have any information regarding Stevan Labudović (I am particularly interested in his early years), as I believe he's notable and deserves an article. Thanks. M.Bitton ( talk) 17:56, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
| Hello, Sadko. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Milan Borjan at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Kncny11 ( talk) 01:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC) |
You consistently vandalize Serbian pages, deny edits from credible sources by the largest and most credible Holocaust memorial in the world, why are you making causing issues that you know are lies? Tvrtko Kotromanic ( talk) 20:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Serbian literature has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
There are a few sections in the article that do not have citations. I did not bother to tag them since they're fairly easy to spot. I quickly found and added a few in the Contemporary Literature section.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 14:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikšić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Popovo.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Sadko,
Do you have a Wiki email? I want to address a private matter if you are willing. Thanks OyMosby ( talk) 02:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello Sadko, I wanted to give you an update about the situation at the Battle of Košare. User Durraz0 and me managed to engage in a proper discussion at the talk page and we found a compromise solution for the article satisfactory for both sides and implemented it, while he admitted to making a mistake before when he just copy-pasted the older version of the article, removing references and so on, and said he would work on correcting himself in the future in this regard. Everything was then fine for a few weeks until editor Adhurim Jakupi, that was previously blocked three times for edit warring at Kosare and Pastrik battle articles, showed up and once again did a blanket revert of the text in the article (removing the compromise wording, removing sources and inserting unsourced text) without any edit summary. I reinstated the discussed-on compromise version, making a note of this in the edit summary and asking Adhurim Jakupi to engage at the talk page. I am guessing, based on his past behavior, that Adhurim Jakupi will just simply revert me first chance he gets and will not engage at the talk page. Like before, any help you could provide in reaching a solution at the article would be appreciated. Cheers! EkoGraf ( talk) 18:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Serbian films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bojan Dimitrijević, Dragan Jovanović and Goran Jevtić.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi @ Sadko:, i found the diffs of the user User:SerVasi very similar to User:Miki Filigranski (another sockpuppet of User:Crovata), and i suspect that is another sockpuppet, what do you thing?... John L. Booth ( talk) 02:18, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Sadko. Thank you. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 01:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Zdravo! I am really glad that you like my creation of the Aleksandar Mašin article. I am even more glad to see that, judging by userboxes on your user page, we apparently have some common points in our worldviews... I am looking forward to hear from you again, to stay in contact and to possibly work together in the future. Sincerely, — Sundostund ( talk) 17:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I would be curious to know what you think about this edit. — Biruitorul Talk 17:59, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
indefinite topic ban from WP:ARBEE
You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at EE#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. In actu (Guerillero) Parlez Moi 01:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Serbian cinema has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 18:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey, Sadko--I know you are not allowed to edit/discuss/etc. these matters, and I feel for you, but there is one thing you can do for me and for Wikipedia: without even saying anything about the subject matter, I need you to tell me which editor would be helpful in getting this article in better shape than it is. I did about all I can do. If you're going to get out from this topic ban, and I assume you will try in a couple months, your case will be strengthened by showing you are in control of things and you have the best interests of the project at heart. So here's one opportunity for you--just give me the name of a good-faith editor who knows their history. As an admin, one who's done some work in various controversial areas, I can guarantee you that answering me will not violate your ban as long as you just give me a name; we're not discussing anything or talking about any content. Just to make sure this is above board, I'm pinging Bishonen and Guerillero. Thanks, and take care, Drmies ( talk) 23:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi Sadko. Haven’t spoken to you in a while and wanted to see how you are doing? Not sure if you live in Serbia or have family there. How are things there? Has vaccine administration begun? Hope all is good given COVID. We Yanks are slowly getting the hang of running a country a century and a half later. Learning the hard way through growing pains. :/ Balkans seemed to be more on top of things. Which is good to see!
Also, wanted to see with you if you would be interested in collaborating on some Non-Balkan articles? I reached mental burn-out and don’t have time to deal with reverts and drama as I am sure you too tire of that shit. I first came to Wikipedia not to dedicate time exclusively to that but a hobby to edit Wikipedia in general. But got preoccupied. And given your temporary edit restrictions this could be good rep work for when you want to appeal. Especially if they see us two work well together. Just a thought. Let me know by pinging me here. Stay safe. Regards OyMosby ( talk) 15:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Culture of Serbia has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I actually feel the article's style is not too bad. I did have to remove some repetitive material. The two biggest problems with the article are that sections of it are out of date and many statements lack citations. I did not check, but I suspect that various contributors brought sentences from the "main" into the sections of this one. If this is the case, the citations used in the main article could be used in this one. If not, citations will have to be found elsewhere.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist ( talk) 21:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Sadko, hope all is well, I was reading through this article and noticed that Bosnina is mentioned twice in the 2011 Language statistics. I don't have access to the census so I am just forwarding it to you since you are an active editor from this region.
-- James Richards ( talk) 13:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Not Wiki related. I see you are a fellow vegetarian, Fire Fly and art and photography lover. I’m quite into photography myself. Any tips on good sources or websites for learning photography and camera equipment? I’m still a bit of an amateur myself. Hadn’t come across other editors before that share a similar hobby. Also as a rambunctious Yankee, I agree, the UN should leave the US and be in Brussels. Not to mention, not sure if you have been there, the building is literally falling apart lol. Metaphorical in a way. As UN current to me means Useless Nations as I don’t feel enough progress is made by the organization. My country is heavily to blame. Guess we have a lot in common interestingly. Just wanted to humanize us two as it is sterile talking to strangers through emotionless text as I realize more and more. Hope you are doing well. Warm regards. OyMosby ( talk) 16:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dara Fanka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
WomenArtistUpdates ( talk) 21:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
All the best wishes to you, your family and friends !!! Theonewithreason ( talk) 31.December 2021 (UTC)
Youve been in the naughty corner for so long i even thought about recommending you for a reduced sentence as i know you enjoy this but it seems like youre the same old dog. Hairli. SerVasi ( talk) 18:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello Bro, how are you doing? Montenegro wiki has many problems currently, Terrible that you can not help contribute here anymore. Surix321 ( talk) 01:19, 10 June 2022 (UTC)