This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I was hoping we could come to some agreement on displaying university rankings, as you've reverted my edits at University of Bedfordshire and Birmingham City University. If you look at any of the highly rate university articles such as University of Bristol they are using the rankings infobox, as I was implementing. There simply does not need to be rankings shown for the past 5/ 10 or more years on these articles. Rather the infobox provides a more concise and encyclopaedia style. Aloneinthewild ( talk) 15:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 22:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
I think you'll be pleased to know this has passed. Good work! Adam Cuerden ( talk) 16:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Great Scottish witch hunt of 1649-50, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pricker ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden ( talk) 16:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
What gives? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearscrewtape ( talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The article Psychedelic music you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Psychedelic music for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 ( talk) 15:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your help policing the page. My computer can't access Wikipedia, apparently due to the new ULS feature, so I can't often be here to keep an eye on it. I appreciate your keeping the spam out. Dementia13 ( talk) 13:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doric ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 12:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Awaiting your response..♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
How are you doing on adding the details on this? Let me know when you think you're done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
You're most welcome, sorry for the delay with it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
And Pytheas. Editor seems to be rewriting these using his own self-published works, eg [1]. Dougweller ( talk) 06:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Black Death may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I suppose putting their nickname in the lead article with only one reference wasn't good haha. How many references would you say is justifiable in order to have it in the lead section? Ultra Violet Light ( talk) 16:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berwick ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scottish trade in the early modern era, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hanseatic and Haddington ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
As per Wikipedia:Overlink: Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, links may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead. (Emphasis mine). The Who has been linked to once in the article, in the very beginning, and this second linkage I added occurs much later. It is in no any way overlinking. It seemed ridiculous to link to the Rolling Stones but NOT to The Who, which occurred a word later in the same sentence. I'm also not sure why you removed the links to Stockholm and Copenhagen as they weren't linked to anywhere, and being rather major cities are certainly deserving of a link. Icemuon ( talk) 15:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 20:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 13:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Music in Medieval Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holyrood ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Salutations, almost everyday while patrolling I come across some IP who does mass changes to genres. Today, I found this one, take a look. Since this obviously isn't vandalism, very rarely someone reverts/warns them, and the first few times when I saw this, I did warn and mass revert them (it took painfully long). I am unfamiliar with these articles, but when IPs grossly start changing all the GAs/FAs without any reason, this is obviously disruptive. I feel uneasy just blindly reverting such edits and since I don't see everyone else doing it, I thought I was wrong/too harsh. What do you think? - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 09:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 12:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
I've responded back to you in the talk page for the 'Honorific nicknames' article. WillieLimpD ( talk) 20:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up after me. I don't know how I did that. Rojomoke ( talk) 22:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I ask you notify Jimmy Wales (if him not difficultly, he need write short text about respecting to John Lennon from The Beatles). Such text can appear in the his blog, for example: http://jimmywales.com
Because Jimmy - is the great man almost everywhere, his opinion will decorate the new International Day of the UN (in preparing via this political party). And this will the good proof that Lennon has the great right be in this list: http://www.un.org/en/events/observances/subject.shtml
Thank you! - 2.92.67.56 ( talk) 21:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, i am suprised that you reverted my contribution to Humpty Dumpty article, i thought that he appeared just in these, can you help me where i can find more about that? Where he also appeared? Thanks for your answer. Jirka.h23 ( talk) 05:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 ( talk) 11:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 17:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
I was prepared to quick pass this one but it seems you're busy... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Modern Era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb ( talk) 18:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 ( talk) 22:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
The Business and Economics Barnstar | ||
Thank you Sabrebd for working to promote Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages to Good article status! Please accept this little sign of appreciation from me. -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 03:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 20:22, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 17:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 21:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Literature in modern Scotland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Changeling and Stream of consciousness ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 13:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 01:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scottish castles may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scottish castles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagaciousphil -- Sagaciousphil ( talk) 10:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Scottish castles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Scottish castles for comments about the article. Well done!
Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagaciousphil -- Sagaciousphil ( talk) 13:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
Well done on another GA; thank you for all the work you do producing Scottish overview articles, they are much appreciated. SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Looks like the bot got here before me! |
Hi Sabrebd
I've cut the infographic down (removed the section of the image on health) to remove the issue of it cutting into the next section (on the three screens I've tried it on) and looks fine on a mobile browser too, I guess on a very high resolution screen it may look funny? If it's still a problem with your screens I can cut it down a bit more. I think it adds value to the article as it gives people a way of visually understanding the information. I didn't understand your message in the edit summary "on for the tp", could you explain it?
Cheers
Mrjohncummings ( talk) 13:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Congrats on getting Scottish castles up to GA! Any chance you could GA review Fort Al Jalali? Let me know if you want anything else reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 ( talk) 00:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Art in early modern Scotland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 17:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
The redirect was the right thing to do. I wish I'd thought of it - so simple, and yet the idea of doing it eluded me. Thanks. Rockypedia ( talk) 18:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 00:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 16:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Scotland in the Early Middle Ages for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 17:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Art in early modern Scotland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Art in early modern Scotland for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 14:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Givors canal, another entry with Aymatth is at GAN if you're interested in reviewing. No worries if not.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:33, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
If you're uncomfortable with doing reviews can you let me know? I won't ask again if this is the case. I'm happy reviewing your articles for GA, but if you could do one or two of mine every now and then I'd appreciate it. Can you let me know? Thanks. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you could reserve it and review when you have a moment, no rush..♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Scottish literature in the Middle Ages for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 21:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Government in early modern Scotland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 ( talk) 09:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 ( talk) 08:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Scottish literature in the Middle Ages for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 15:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heartland rock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn ( talk) 18:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Heartland rock you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Heartland rock for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn ( talk) 19:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I was hoping we could come to some agreement on displaying university rankings, as you've reverted my edits at University of Bedfordshire and Birmingham City University. If you look at any of the highly rate university articles such as University of Bristol they are using the rankings infobox, as I was implementing. There simply does not need to be rankings shown for the past 5/ 10 or more years on these articles. Rather the infobox provides a more concise and encyclopaedia style. Aloneinthewild ( talk) 15:41, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 22:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
I think you'll be pleased to know this has passed. Good work! Adam Cuerden ( talk) 16:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Great Scottish witch hunt of 1649-50, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pricker ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden ( talk) 16:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
What gives? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dearscrewtape ( talk • contribs) 22:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The article Psychedelic music you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Psychedelic music for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 ( talk) 15:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 19:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your help policing the page. My computer can't access Wikipedia, apparently due to the new ULS feature, so I can't often be here to keep an eye on it. I appreciate your keeping the spam out. Dementia13 ( talk) 13:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doric ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Industrial Revolution for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 12:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Awaiting your response..♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
How are you doing on adding the details on this? Let me know when you think you're done.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
You're most welcome, sorry for the delay with it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
And Pytheas. Editor seems to be rewriting these using his own self-published works, eg [1]. Dougweller ( talk) 06:12, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Black Death may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
I suppose putting their nickname in the lead article with only one reference wasn't good haha. How many references would you say is justifiable in order to have it in the lead section? Ultra Violet Light ( talk) 16:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berwick ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scottish trade in the early modern era, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hanseatic and Haddington ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
As per Wikipedia:Overlink: Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, links may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead. (Emphasis mine). The Who has been linked to once in the article, in the very beginning, and this second linkage I added occurs much later. It is in no any way overlinking. It seemed ridiculous to link to the Rolling Stones but NOT to The Who, which occurred a word later in the same sentence. I'm also not sure why you removed the links to Stockholm and Copenhagen as they weren't linked to anywhere, and being rather major cities are certainly deserving of a link. Icemuon ( talk) 15:11, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 20:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 13:12, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Music in Medieval Scotland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holyrood ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Salutations, almost everyday while patrolling I come across some IP who does mass changes to genres. Today, I found this one, take a look. Since this obviously isn't vandalism, very rarely someone reverts/warns them, and the first few times when I saw this, I did warn and mass revert them (it took painfully long). I am unfamiliar with these articles, but when IPs grossly start changing all the GAs/FAs without any reason, this is obviously disruptive. I feel uneasy just blindly reverting such edits and since I don't see everyone else doing it, I thought I was wrong/too harsh. What do you think? - Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 09:01, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Middle Ages for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 12:22, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
I've responded back to you in the talk page for the 'Honorific nicknames' article. WillieLimpD ( talk) 20:06, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for cleaning up after me. I don't know how I did that. Rojomoke ( talk) 22:49, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I ask you notify Jimmy Wales (if him not difficultly, he need write short text about respecting to John Lennon from The Beatles). Such text can appear in the his blog, for example: http://jimmywales.com
Because Jimmy - is the great man almost everywhere, his opinion will decorate the new International Day of the UN (in preparing via this political party). And this will the good proof that Lennon has the great right be in this list: http://www.un.org/en/events/observances/subject.shtml
Thank you! - 2.92.67.56 ( talk) 21:38, 11 October 2013 (UTC).
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, i am suprised that you reverted my contribution to Humpty Dumpty article, i thought that he appeared just in these, can you help me where i can find more about that? Where he also appeared? Thanks for your answer. Jirka.h23 ( talk) 05:54, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 ( talk) 11:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 17:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
I was prepared to quick pass this one but it seems you're busy... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:24, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Modern Era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Royroydeb -- Royroydeb ( talk) 18:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 ( talk) 22:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
The Business and Economics Barnstar | ||
Thank you Sabrebd for working to promote Economy of Scotland in the Middle Ages to Good article status! Please accept this little sign of appreciation from me. -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 03:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:05, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Prehistoric era for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 20:22, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 17:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 21:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Literature in modern Scotland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Changeling and Stream of consciousness ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Architecture of Scotland in the Roman era for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 13:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 01:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scottish castles may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:47, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scottish castles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagaciousphil -- Sagaciousphil ( talk) 10:05, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Scottish castles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Scottish castles for comments about the article. Well done!
Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sagaciousphil -- Sagaciousphil ( talk) 13:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
The Good Article Barnstar | ||
Well done on another GA; thank you for all the work you do producing Scottish overview articles, they are much appreciated. SagaciousPhil - Chat 13:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Looks like the bot got here before me! |
Hi Sabrebd
I've cut the infographic down (removed the section of the image on health) to remove the issue of it cutting into the next section (on the three screens I've tried it on) and looks fine on a mobile browser too, I guess on a very high resolution screen it may look funny? If it's still a problem with your screens I can cut it down a bit more. I think it adds value to the article as it gives people a way of visually understanding the information. I didn't understand your message in the edit summary "on for the tp", could you explain it?
Cheers
Mrjohncummings ( talk) 13:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Congrats on getting Scottish castles up to GA! Any chance you could GA review Fort Al Jalali? Let me know if you want anything else reviewed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 ( talk) 00:45, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Art in early modern Scotland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 17:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
The redirect was the right thing to do. I wish I'd thought of it - so simple, and yet the idea of doing it eluded me. Thanks. Rockypedia ( talk) 18:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 00:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 16:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Scotland in the Early Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Scotland in the Early Middle Ages for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 17:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Art in early modern Scotland you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Art in early modern Scotland for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dr. Blofeld -- Dr. Blofeld ( talk) 14:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Givors canal, another entry with Aymatth is at GAN if you're interested in reviewing. No worries if not.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:33, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
If you're uncomfortable with doing reviews can you let me know? I won't ask again if this is the case. I'm happy reviewing your articles for GA, but if you could do one or two of mine every now and then I'd appreciate it. Can you let me know? Thanks. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you could reserve it and review when you have a moment, no rush..♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Scottish literature in the Middle Ages for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 21:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Government in early modern Scotland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of LT910001 -- LT910001 ( talk) 09:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 ( talk) 08:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Scottish literature in the Middle Ages you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Scottish literature in the Middle Ages for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell ( talk) 15:12, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heartland rock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn ( talk) 18:10, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Heartland rock you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Heartland rock for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn ( talk) 19:20, 28 December 2013 (UTC)