Archived Talk Pages: User talk:STS01/Archive1
Any idea who this is that keeps adding this same material to Finebaum's article? We could actually keep some of it if there were sourced cited, but there aren't. Realkyhick 18:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
I already tried. There wasn't enough vandalism to merit protection. Just keep reverting those IP edits. I'll try again if it continues. -- STS01 22:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
That should at least cause things to slow down, for you STS. SirFozzie 14:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
OK, I can perhaps understand deleting the stuff about Finebaum doing TV sports reports from his radio studio, since I don't have a source to cite for that. But the Tommy Charles book does exist — an ISBN number is assigned, and links to the book do work. It is relevant to Finebaum, his show and his career. This is beginning to appear personal. What's your reasoning? Realkyhick 15:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
The Tommy Charles book is not one of Finebaums publication. The other items that I removed are not relevant. Not personal. http://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_sig.png Your signature with timestamp
It is just as unfair for you to call the removal of cited information a "correction" as it is for the anonymous editor to call your edits "vandalism". If you have a helpful opinion about the validity of the Langham and Bowden stories as part of the article, then bring it up on the discussion page. Otherwise it looks like you're applying a POV. -- Dystopos 14:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Archived Talk Pages: User talk:STS01/Archive1
Any idea who this is that keeps adding this same material to Finebaum's article? We could actually keep some of it if there were sourced cited, but there aren't. Realkyhick 18:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
I already tried. There wasn't enough vandalism to merit protection. Just keep reverting those IP edits. I'll try again if it continues. -- STS01 22:07, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
That should at least cause things to slow down, for you STS. SirFozzie 14:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
OK, I can perhaps understand deleting the stuff about Finebaum doing TV sports reports from his radio studio, since I don't have a source to cite for that. But the Tommy Charles book does exist — an ISBN number is assigned, and links to the book do work. It is relevant to Finebaum, his show and his career. This is beginning to appear personal. What's your reasoning? Realkyhick 15:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
The Tommy Charles book is not one of Finebaums publication. The other items that I removed are not relevant. Not personal. http://en.wikipedia.org/skins-1.5/common/images/button_sig.png Your signature with timestamp
It is just as unfair for you to call the removal of cited information a "correction" as it is for the anonymous editor to call your edits "vandalism". If you have a helpful opinion about the validity of the Langham and Bowden stories as part of the article, then bring it up on the discussion page. Otherwise it looks like you're applying a POV. -- Dystopos 14:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)