If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may
appeal this username block by adding the text {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice.
You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our
username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{
unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice. Thank you.
Valfontis (
talk)
18:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
SSMO Campus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
SSMO Campus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
At this time, I am not aware of any staff members who wish to create accounts in their own names. The easiest way would be to update our user name to meet your guidelines - and ensure that it is not shared or transferred - but we are having difficulties finding the directions on doing that easily. Is there a quick way to do that through account setttings? Thank for your continued guidance.. SSMO Campus ( talk) 20:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below. — Daniel Case ( talk) 05:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An observation: This is an example of why the information about organizations is frequently outdated or incorrect on Wikipedia pages. It usually falls to someone in a communications office - and the staff members who are asked to ensure that information is current - to do this. They may not wish to create their own Wikipedia user name or account. Additionally, in any organization, staffing changes, people move on without closing out accounts, and someone has to start the process over again and experience the same frustration as I (personal pronoun) have. I'm going to leave the SSMO campus pages (because that's what they are) as they are. At this time, it's not worth the frustration of trying to update them. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.30.80.174 ( talk) 01:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
A suggestion from me, the administrator who blocked you, and the primary editor who keeps an eye on Sisters of St. Mary of Oregon, one of the articles you edited. You are always free to put suggestions about edits on the talk page of an article. We (the Wikipedia community) cannot guarantee that the article about your organization will be exactly as you want it but I for one try to be fair. The update you made was helpful (although it broke the references), the only thing I really changed was to take out the word "rich" which is somewhat not neutral and can be seen as promotional. Which may be why another editor immediately reverted the changes. I have never had time to write up an expanded history about the origins of the community, that would be a good place to start as far as suggesting some edits. Let me know if you need more suggestions. I'm adding a belated welcome template after this post so you can read up on some of the principles behind Wikipedia. I hope this helps. Valfontis ( talk) 03:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, SSMO Campus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Valfontis (
talk)
03:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Here is some info about what to do if you have conflict of interest in a Wikipedia article.
Hello, SSMO Campus. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Valfontis ( talk) 03:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may
appeal this username block by adding the text {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice.
You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our
username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{
unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice. Thank you.
Valfontis (
talk)
18:37, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
SSMO Campus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
SSMO Campus ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
At this time, I am not aware of any staff members who wish to create accounts in their own names. The easiest way would be to update our user name to meet your guidelines - and ensure that it is not shared or transferred - but we are having difficulties finding the directions on doing that easily. Is there a quick way to do that through account setttings? Thank for your continued guidance.. SSMO Campus ( talk) 20:35, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per below. — Daniel Case ( talk) 05:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An observation: This is an example of why the information about organizations is frequently outdated or incorrect on Wikipedia pages. It usually falls to someone in a communications office - and the staff members who are asked to ensure that information is current - to do this. They may not wish to create their own Wikipedia user name or account. Additionally, in any organization, staffing changes, people move on without closing out accounts, and someone has to start the process over again and experience the same frustration as I (personal pronoun) have. I'm going to leave the SSMO campus pages (because that's what they are) as they are. At this time, it's not worth the frustration of trying to update them. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.30.80.174 ( talk) 01:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
A suggestion from me, the administrator who blocked you, and the primary editor who keeps an eye on Sisters of St. Mary of Oregon, one of the articles you edited. You are always free to put suggestions about edits on the talk page of an article. We (the Wikipedia community) cannot guarantee that the article about your organization will be exactly as you want it but I for one try to be fair. The update you made was helpful (although it broke the references), the only thing I really changed was to take out the word "rich" which is somewhat not neutral and can be seen as promotional. Which may be why another editor immediately reverted the changes. I have never had time to write up an expanded history about the origins of the community, that would be a good place to start as far as suggesting some edits. Let me know if you need more suggestions. I'm adding a belated welcome template after this post so you can read up on some of the principles behind Wikipedia. I hope this helps. Valfontis ( talk) 03:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, SSMO Campus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Valfontis (
talk)
03:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Here is some info about what to do if you have conflict of interest in a Wikipedia article.
Hello, SSMO Campus. We
welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Valfontis ( talk) 03:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC)