From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: I am the subject of the article 'Robert Letellier' which appeared on Wikipedia without my knowledge or consent. I have edited it to retain elements of my privacy, and request that you restore my edits made yesterday. Le Domino noir ( talk) 09:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia is not censored, and perhaps you should read WP:CENSOR. SHB2000 ( talk) 10:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Reverting quality edit

Hey SHB200, would you mind personally reviewing this revert you just performed to see it isn't harmful? thx! I'm working to address a tag. [12] 92.30.81.54 Thx! ( talk) 12:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

That's not a quality edit, and if you want to make test edits, use the graffiti wall. Don't do it on main space, where readers will be reading it and then come up to me saying "it was a quality edit". SHB2000 ( talk) 12:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Well I sure think it was quality - what would you recommend I do differently, so I don't bother you again with my changes? Edit summary for each sentence removed, maybe? 92.30.81.54 ( talk) 13:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Well, it's simple. Don't remove content. SHB2000 ( talk) 13:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply
I certainly won't agree to that. I'll leave better edit summaries for you to scrutinize on an edit by edit basis, and will respond promptly to any worries you may have. If you revert such edits as well without explanation, I'd be happy to engage in a discussion on the matter with external parties involved, say the harassment board. 92.30.81.54 ( talk) 13:43, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply
You may want to be careful on the comment, as that can be taken as a legal threat, which aren't welcome here per WP:LEGAL. And to the edit, I've looked a bit more detail in your edit history, and okay, you may revert me, just with a better edit summary so it does not seem suspicious (and another editor might revert you, so just provide a better edit summary or log in). Also, FYI, register an account please, as it's quite difficult to build a reputation with an IP address. SHB2000 ( talk) 13:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

15:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

16:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2021





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: I am the subject of the article 'Robert Letellier' which appeared on Wikipedia without my knowledge or consent. I have edited it to retain elements of my privacy, and request that you restore my edits made yesterday. Le Domino noir ( talk) 09:58, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia is not censored, and perhaps you should read WP:CENSOR. SHB2000 ( talk) 10:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Reverting quality edit

Hey SHB200, would you mind personally reviewing this revert you just performed to see it isn't harmful? thx! I'm working to address a tag. [12] 92.30.81.54 Thx! ( talk) 12:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

That's not a quality edit, and if you want to make test edits, use the graffiti wall. Don't do it on main space, where readers will be reading it and then come up to me saying "it was a quality edit". SHB2000 ( talk) 12:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Well I sure think it was quality - what would you recommend I do differently, so I don't bother you again with my changes? Edit summary for each sentence removed, maybe? 92.30.81.54 ( talk) 13:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply
Well, it's simple. Don't remove content. SHB2000 ( talk) 13:32, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply
I certainly won't agree to that. I'll leave better edit summaries for you to scrutinize on an edit by edit basis, and will respond promptly to any worries you may have. If you revert such edits as well without explanation, I'd be happy to engage in a discussion on the matter with external parties involved, say the harassment board. 92.30.81.54 ( talk) 13:43, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply
You may want to be careful on the comment, as that can be taken as a legal threat, which aren't welcome here per WP:LEGAL. And to the edit, I've looked a bit more detail in your edit history, and okay, you may revert me, just with a better edit summary so it does not seem suspicious (and another editor might revert you, so just provide a better edit summary or log in). Also, FYI, register an account please, as it's quite difficult to build a reputation with an IP address. SHB2000 ( talk) 13:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC) reply

15:48, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

16:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook