![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | → | Archive 90 |
Stop edit warring, you are drastically altering changes and I do not consent to them, the matter is at DRN! You wanted no changes from me, you should not change them yourself. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 23:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
You're compromising too much just to find middle ground. And Chris knows if you continue to budge there would be no difference between "Ghost in the Shell (manga)" and "List of Ghost in the Shell chapters". That's why he preffers arguing with you than me. I don't agree we should summarize the plots (or at least the plot to the first manga) in the main article as it has been adapted in theatrical film and TV film (Solid State Society). List of Ghost in the Shell chapters is just a child list-article, so probably best to not add so much detail of censorship. (Also, it may have been noted but not significant to have its own section. It censored in its initial release 2 pages, then added back in the 2nd edition. Nothing major). Lucia Black ( talk) 08:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Well probably not republications such as Kodansha USA, but noting the alternate versions is important for at least gits2. And probably noting what makes each one different isn't that important either.
Git2 all takes place in the same day and each chapter at a different time (2:00pm, 4:00pm etc.). Oddly, the prologue and epilogue are before all the other chapters and explain where motoko's evolution has reached. So Gits2 main plot could be first and last chapter. Gits1.5 is about section 9 without Motoko and the new tongue and cheek humorous section 9 member Azuma and a little bit on Proto. However Gits1.5 has no specific plot. Lucia Black ( talk) 09:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
If he doesn't want mediation, then that means he's willing to give up. Or at least showing sign of defeat. Lucia Black ( talk) 15:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
The article is a train wreck, it is so jumbled, distorted and chaotic that it doesn't even detail Shirow's work more so then Oshii's. Its not even balanced or fair in any of its portrayals. Lucia has also been adding false information about the Puppetmaster to the other article, I know everyone's intention is to improve the article, but there are serious content issues that are present and need to be addressed. This may be a content dispute, but right now it needs to be tagged appropriately or corrected. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Differences aside, we need to work together! Here's to cooperation in the future. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
First of all, I apologize the do not see the guidelines on the top at first. Plus I'm a newbie editor, so I'm still learning how to use the editing tools and the signature.
Extended content
|
---|
Then, this is a completely BS. Sorry for my language. Do you understand what does a constituent country mean?
For example:
Even though in Leg 10, the editors will italic the word United Kingdom and put Scotland in front of the UK. The reason behind this is to specify which country they are going to. The show had specified that the teams are going to Scotland but NOT United Kingdom, same as Northern Ireland and England in this season.
of every leg. Leg 1 (New York → New Jersey → Pennsylvania) Leg 2 (Pennsylvania → Washington, D.C. → Virginia) Leg 3 (Virginia → South Carolina → Alabama) Leg 4 (Alabama → Mississippi → Louisiana) Leg 5 (Louisiana → Panama) Leg 7 (Costa Rica → Arizona) Leg 8 (Arizona) Leg 9 (Arizona → Utah) Leg 10 (Utah → Wyoming → Montana) (TAR 8) |
P.S. You are not the only editor responsible for this page nor you own this page, so don't think you have absolute right and others are wrong. Consider the comments and suggestions from other editors and TAR fans. I'm here because I am trying to make the page better since I'm a die-hard TAR fan, but not because I have too much time and spend some to argue with you here. I'm just trying to stand my point here. Please do not get offended. Have a good day.— RiceEater93 ( talk) 05:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
So I'm planning to start an RfC on this matter so that a proper consensus can be reached. Is this a good idea? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 20:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Since you removed the eliminated contestants in all seasons of Hell's Kitchen and MasterChef, the consistency is for winners and runner-ups in the table. I removed all of the contestants who'd eliminated in all cycles (seasons) of America's Next Top Model on the central page of the table and they're not really needed to encyclopedic. They can be found in all of the cycle's articles. [1] See, GTPMF ( talk · contribs) returned the old format and not really verifiable. I guess I'll revert it and I'll remove them to all of other Top Model franchises worldwide. ApprenticeFan work 06:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject Japan Barnsensu Award | |
For your excellent defense of rationalism in the AfD discussion for the Ryukyu Province article. [2]. Victory for historical authenticity was had due to your strong and uncompromising effort driving at the truth. |
Jun Kayama 13:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with Ryūkyū Province, I didn't even notice this was going on. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 14:12, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I’m sorry if I caused offense by moving your comment on Talk:Dragon Ball closer to the comment to which it was replying. I did that because it was confusing, and possibly somewhat misleading, to have it positioned as a reply to a later comment that had nothing to do with the contested RfC. I presume that’s also the reason that User:ChrisGualtieri hid it along with his reply. Since you objected to both of these actions, I’ve simply changed the indentation to make it clearer what was being replied to, which should hopefully both be innocuous enough for you and prevent possible confusion. — Frungi ( talk) 07:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | → | Archive 90 |
Stop edit warring, you are drastically altering changes and I do not consent to them, the matter is at DRN! You wanted no changes from me, you should not change them yourself. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 23:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
You're compromising too much just to find middle ground. And Chris knows if you continue to budge there would be no difference between "Ghost in the Shell (manga)" and "List of Ghost in the Shell chapters". That's why he preffers arguing with you than me. I don't agree we should summarize the plots (or at least the plot to the first manga) in the main article as it has been adapted in theatrical film and TV film (Solid State Society). List of Ghost in the Shell chapters is just a child list-article, so probably best to not add so much detail of censorship. (Also, it may have been noted but not significant to have its own section. It censored in its initial release 2 pages, then added back in the 2nd edition. Nothing major). Lucia Black ( talk) 08:28, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Well probably not republications such as Kodansha USA, but noting the alternate versions is important for at least gits2. And probably noting what makes each one different isn't that important either.
Git2 all takes place in the same day and each chapter at a different time (2:00pm, 4:00pm etc.). Oddly, the prologue and epilogue are before all the other chapters and explain where motoko's evolution has reached. So Gits2 main plot could be first and last chapter. Gits1.5 is about section 9 without Motoko and the new tongue and cheek humorous section 9 member Azuma and a little bit on Proto. However Gits1.5 has no specific plot. Lucia Black ( talk) 09:44, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
If he doesn't want mediation, then that means he's willing to give up. Or at least showing sign of defeat. Lucia Black ( talk) 15:48, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
The article is a train wreck, it is so jumbled, distorted and chaotic that it doesn't even detail Shirow's work more so then Oshii's. Its not even balanced or fair in any of its portrayals. Lucia has also been adding false information about the Puppetmaster to the other article, I know everyone's intention is to improve the article, but there are serious content issues that are present and need to be addressed. This may be a content dispute, but right now it needs to be tagged appropriately or corrected. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 03:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Differences aside, we need to work together! Here's to cooperation in the future. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:23, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
First of all, I apologize the do not see the guidelines on the top at first. Plus I'm a newbie editor, so I'm still learning how to use the editing tools and the signature.
Extended content
|
---|
Then, this is a completely BS. Sorry for my language. Do you understand what does a constituent country mean?
For example:
Even though in Leg 10, the editors will italic the word United Kingdom and put Scotland in front of the UK. The reason behind this is to specify which country they are going to. The show had specified that the teams are going to Scotland but NOT United Kingdom, same as Northern Ireland and England in this season.
of every leg. Leg 1 (New York → New Jersey → Pennsylvania) Leg 2 (Pennsylvania → Washington, D.C. → Virginia) Leg 3 (Virginia → South Carolina → Alabama) Leg 4 (Alabama → Mississippi → Louisiana) Leg 5 (Louisiana → Panama) Leg 7 (Costa Rica → Arizona) Leg 8 (Arizona) Leg 9 (Arizona → Utah) Leg 10 (Utah → Wyoming → Montana) (TAR 8) |
P.S. You are not the only editor responsible for this page nor you own this page, so don't think you have absolute right and others are wrong. Consider the comments and suggestions from other editors and TAR fans. I'm here because I am trying to make the page better since I'm a die-hard TAR fan, but not because I have too much time and spend some to argue with you here. I'm just trying to stand my point here. Please do not get offended. Have a good day.— RiceEater93 ( talk) 05:33, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
So I'm planning to start an RfC on this matter so that a proper consensus can be reached. Is this a good idea? Thanks. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 20:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Since you removed the eliminated contestants in all seasons of Hell's Kitchen and MasterChef, the consistency is for winners and runner-ups in the table. I removed all of the contestants who'd eliminated in all cycles (seasons) of America's Next Top Model on the central page of the table and they're not really needed to encyclopedic. They can be found in all of the cycle's articles. [1] See, GTPMF ( talk · contribs) returned the old format and not really verifiable. I guess I'll revert it and I'll remove them to all of other Top Model franchises worldwide. ApprenticeFan work 06:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
WikiProject Japan Barnsensu Award | |
For your excellent defense of rationalism in the AfD discussion for the Ryukyu Province article. [2]. Victory for historical authenticity was had due to your strong and uncompromising effort driving at the truth. |
Jun Kayama 13:05, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with Ryūkyū Province, I didn't even notice this was going on. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 14:12, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
I’m sorry if I caused offense by moving your comment on Talk:Dragon Ball closer to the comment to which it was replying. I did that because it was confusing, and possibly somewhat misleading, to have it positioned as a reply to a later comment that had nothing to do with the contested RfC. I presume that’s also the reason that User:ChrisGualtieri hid it along with his reply. Since you objected to both of these actions, I’ve simply changed the indentation to make it clearer what was being replied to, which should hopefully both be innocuous enough for you and prevent possible confusion. — Frungi ( talk) 07:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)