![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | → | Archive 90 |
Please don't say, "Do not move it again" in the edit summary - as if I had done it before - or assuming that I would do that. But it does look bad and out of place where it is. -- Musdan77 ( talk) 03:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
I reverted your redirecting of the manga. I previously had corrected the opposite of this from Lucia Black, the manga itself is one aspect of the franchise, but as you are doing what I didn't with Arise, I'm pleased you have done so much already for it. I took a wiki-break because I didn't want a mess with Lucia Black after her disruptions and drama became outright silly. Now, before I get into the matter, I want to point out, we seem to be on the same side.
Ghost in the Shell as a franchise is very weird and unusual, but Lucia's Black argument of merging the franchise (where Ghost in the Shell is) to the manga, was a bad idea. Sadly, because I hadn't dealt the critical blow to separate both pages you took a more obvious route, merge the manga to the franchise. I'm of the opposite category, remove the extraneous adaptations, unrelated SAC and Arise material from the original manga series and put forth the original works by Masamune as the main Ghost in the Shell page. Its not ideal, but it is better then duplication. The matter was made worse by Yu Kinutani, and the novels by Junichi Fujisaku and Masaki Yamada. It's a lot to sift through. Though I do not want to go through another 'episode' with Lucia Black, I do want Ghost in the Shell's articles to be better, I just don't want to take so much flak for something essentially trivial.
I'm going to try and begin refining the manga article to this scope, I do like your changes and work to the franchise page. I'm actually glad that you did this work, because Lucia Black tried to rid the franchise page entirely, and with Arise coming out, the franchise page is more important to have now. Any ideas on dealing with the craziness of the canon of GITS? ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 01:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For your efforts on the Ghost in the Shell pages. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 18:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC) |
I'm done arguing with Lucia Black. I'm just going to start trying to improve the page. End of story. I cannot read Japanese, for what it is worth, but I do want the page to be better. If you can translate some scans or something that might be useful because I cannot understand them at all. And it seems you can translate. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm not going to give you a barnstar for bluntness (we don't have one yet), but I agree that there was no rudeness on Talk:Random Access Memories. Happy days, Drmies ( talk) 17:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
An IP editor added a fake episode description to List of Power Rangers Megaforce episodes. Another IP editor reverted it, but a third put it back. I just removed the vandalism again, perhaps you could arrange for semi-protection on the page? Thanks. Digifiend ( talk) 01:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Do NOT edit my sandbox to remove the page I put in. I should not see ECs from you, I've had 8 of them since this began less then half an hour ago. Do not edit my userspace. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
I just dont get it. It seems like both you and Chrisgualtieri misunderstand what i'm asking for. How does my stubborness cause other editors to split the article if I'm completely against that???? You tell ChrisGualtieri to "ignore" me, yet tell him the exact same thing when it comes to not splitting the article. Do you even read the discussion???? I dont think you understand what i want to do with the article. So i ask you what you think i'm asking. Lucia Black ( talk) 08:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
I would like your input here Shadow2 ( talk) 23:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
The DR matter is going slow... so I propose that we try and work out some solution. I am going to avoid Lucia unless it is on the DRN page, the drama is just too great and I do not want to lose your input on these articles. Now, I would like to tackle the matter of Ghost in the Shell, but let's divert our attention for the time being to establish some camaraderie between us. I say pick an article or subject to work on, but I am concerned about the overall structure of the pages. So I'm going to offer this, want to try and come to an agreement about the GITS page or want to try and work together on another page? ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong, it's not about whether it's an initialism or not. 1) Random ref title: PSY Wants Tom Cruise to go 'Gangnam Style,' Talks 2013 Album. The title of this work clearly is "PSY Wants..." and not "Psy Wants...". You can also see that almost all of the other sources use "PSY" as opposed to "Psy". You are not supposed to be changing original titles of these works. Track listing also lists him as "PSY". Again, why change? Did you even check to see what you were changing? Please seek consensus first. Thank you. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) My observation: Whether it's newspapers or online, I see a mixture of PSY and Psy. Arctic Kangaroo 14:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I made a new section under gits talkpage so it could be easier for outsiders to discuss. I mentioned that you agree to certain degree, if not completely. It would be great if you could mention your view and what you may not agree with. Lucia Black ( talk) 21:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
You did a very gorgeous job rebuilding the Kirby: Right Back at Ya! Episode Page. -- Vaati the Wind Demon ( talk) 15:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong. I just wanted to tell you that I mentioned you in my latest report at ANI concerning WikiSkeptic ( talk · contribs). No further action is needed on your part. Just wanted to let you know out of courtesy. Best regards. Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 15:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
[...] where does this German name for the opening come from?
It's in the opening credits: [2]. Still, it seems like a sub-title or something. It's only listed in kanji on the official anime site and in retailers for the single.— Preceding unsigned comment added by HigherFive ( talk • contribs)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | Archive 81 | Archive 82 | Archive 83 | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | → | Archive 90 |
Please don't say, "Do not move it again" in the edit summary - as if I had done it before - or assuming that I would do that. But it does look bad and out of place where it is. -- Musdan77 ( talk) 03:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
I reverted your redirecting of the manga. I previously had corrected the opposite of this from Lucia Black, the manga itself is one aspect of the franchise, but as you are doing what I didn't with Arise, I'm pleased you have done so much already for it. I took a wiki-break because I didn't want a mess with Lucia Black after her disruptions and drama became outright silly. Now, before I get into the matter, I want to point out, we seem to be on the same side.
Ghost in the Shell as a franchise is very weird and unusual, but Lucia's Black argument of merging the franchise (where Ghost in the Shell is) to the manga, was a bad idea. Sadly, because I hadn't dealt the critical blow to separate both pages you took a more obvious route, merge the manga to the franchise. I'm of the opposite category, remove the extraneous adaptations, unrelated SAC and Arise material from the original manga series and put forth the original works by Masamune as the main Ghost in the Shell page. Its not ideal, but it is better then duplication. The matter was made worse by Yu Kinutani, and the novels by Junichi Fujisaku and Masaki Yamada. It's a lot to sift through. Though I do not want to go through another 'episode' with Lucia Black, I do want Ghost in the Shell's articles to be better, I just don't want to take so much flak for something essentially trivial.
I'm going to try and begin refining the manga article to this scope, I do like your changes and work to the franchise page. I'm actually glad that you did this work, because Lucia Black tried to rid the franchise page entirely, and with Arise coming out, the franchise page is more important to have now. Any ideas on dealing with the craziness of the canon of GITS? ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 01:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For your efforts on the Ghost in the Shell pages. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 18:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC) |
I'm done arguing with Lucia Black. I'm just going to start trying to improve the page. End of story. I cannot read Japanese, for what it is worth, but I do want the page to be better. If you can translate some scans or something that might be useful because I cannot understand them at all. And it seems you can translate. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 05:28, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
I'm not going to give you a barnstar for bluntness (we don't have one yet), but I agree that there was no rudeness on Talk:Random Access Memories. Happy days, Drmies ( talk) 17:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
An IP editor added a fake episode description to List of Power Rangers Megaforce episodes. Another IP editor reverted it, but a third put it back. I just removed the vandalism again, perhaps you could arrange for semi-protection on the page? Thanks. Digifiend ( talk) 01:29, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Do NOT edit my sandbox to remove the page I put in. I should not see ECs from you, I've had 8 of them since this began less then half an hour ago. Do not edit my userspace. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 04:12, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
I just dont get it. It seems like both you and Chrisgualtieri misunderstand what i'm asking for. How does my stubborness cause other editors to split the article if I'm completely against that???? You tell ChrisGualtieri to "ignore" me, yet tell him the exact same thing when it comes to not splitting the article. Do you even read the discussion???? I dont think you understand what i want to do with the article. So i ask you what you think i'm asking. Lucia Black ( talk) 08:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
I would like your input here Shadow2 ( talk) 23:22, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
The DR matter is going slow... so I propose that we try and work out some solution. I am going to avoid Lucia unless it is on the DRN page, the drama is just too great and I do not want to lose your input on these articles. Now, I would like to tackle the matter of Ghost in the Shell, but let's divert our attention for the time being to establish some camaraderie between us. I say pick an article or subject to work on, but I am concerned about the overall structure of the pages. So I'm going to offer this, want to try and come to an agreement about the GITS page or want to try and work together on another page? ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 02:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong, it's not about whether it's an initialism or not. 1) Random ref title: PSY Wants Tom Cruise to go 'Gangnam Style,' Talks 2013 Album. The title of this work clearly is "PSY Wants..." and not "Psy Wants...". You can also see that almost all of the other sources use "PSY" as opposed to "Psy". You are not supposed to be changing original titles of these works. Track listing also lists him as "PSY". Again, why change? Did you even check to see what you were changing? Please seek consensus first. Thank you. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 14:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
( talk page stalker) My observation: Whether it's newspapers or online, I see a mixture of PSY and Psy. Arctic Kangaroo 14:56, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
I made a new section under gits talkpage so it could be easier for outsiders to discuss. I mentioned that you agree to certain degree, if not completely. It would be great if you could mention your view and what you may not agree with. Lucia Black ( talk) 21:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
You did a very gorgeous job rebuilding the Kirby: Right Back at Ya! Episode Page. -- Vaati the Wind Demon ( talk) 15:09, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ryulong. I just wanted to tell you that I mentioned you in my latest report at ANI concerning WikiSkeptic ( talk · contribs). No further action is needed on your part. Just wanted to let you know out of courtesy. Best regards. Δρ.Κ. λόγος πράξις 15:20, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
[...] where does this German name for the opening come from?
It's in the opening credits: [2]. Still, it seems like a sub-title or something. It's only listed in kanji on the official anime site and in retailers for the single.— Preceding unsigned comment added by HigherFive ( talk • contribs)