Incase you are unaware, User:Subhash_bose has been blocked for a week for blatantly uncivil comments and fundamentalist propaganda. Anwar 02:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Why do you suspect him to be a sockpuppet of User:Subhash bose? Is there any diff evidence or confession? See an active sock farm here. Anwar 21:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
So Mr Rushdie, author of the Satanic Verses. If you have any specific issues with the article then please discuss. Thank you. I'm watching it for both Islamofascist and Hindutva POV. The article is poorly written tho.( Netaji 10:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC))
- Don't be difficult. The edit is blatantly racist and anti-Hindu and filled with caricatures and pejorative remarks. If you persist then action will be necessary, and I have no desire to perpetrate unpleasantness.
Netaji
12:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Dont criticise authors.Justify your edits
Rushdie 12:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Now look at what you have done. The article is blocked. How has that helped either of us? eh? Lkadvani's edit was completely irrelevant to the subject matter of the article. The boycott did not happen in 2002, it did not happen in Gujarat, it was not violent. It does not belong in an article titled "2002 Gujarat Violence". Get it? Plus, Lkadvani is a confirmed anti-Hindu racist (probably a missionary. Do you know what those missionaries say about Islam?) Netaji 12:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Lkadvani is definitely not NPOV. Look at his user page Bakaman%% 01:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Please see my proposal at Talk:2002 Gujarat violence#Proposal for informal mediation from Bcorr. Thanks, BCorr| Брайен 20:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Incase you are unaware, User:Subhash_bose has been blocked for a week for blatantly uncivil comments and fundamentalist propaganda. Anwar 02:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Why do you suspect him to be a sockpuppet of User:Subhash bose? Is there any diff evidence or confession? See an active sock farm here. Anwar 21:41, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
So Mr Rushdie, author of the Satanic Verses. If you have any specific issues with the article then please discuss. Thank you. I'm watching it for both Islamofascist and Hindutva POV. The article is poorly written tho.( Netaji 10:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC))
- Don't be difficult. The edit is blatantly racist and anti-Hindu and filled with caricatures and pejorative remarks. If you persist then action will be necessary, and I have no desire to perpetrate unpleasantness.
Netaji
12:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Dont criticise authors.Justify your edits
Rushdie 12:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Now look at what you have done. The article is blocked. How has that helped either of us? eh? Lkadvani's edit was completely irrelevant to the subject matter of the article. The boycott did not happen in 2002, it did not happen in Gujarat, it was not violent. It does not belong in an article titled "2002 Gujarat Violence". Get it? Plus, Lkadvani is a confirmed anti-Hindu racist (probably a missionary. Do you know what those missionaries say about Islam?) Netaji 12:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Lkadvani is definitely not NPOV. Look at his user page Bakaman%% 01:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Please see my proposal at Talk:2002 Gujarat violence#Proposal for informal mediation from Bcorr. Thanks, BCorr| Брайен 20:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)