Welcome!
Hello, Ruedi33a, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. 12:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I've watching many of your recent edits, and first i want to thank you for your new articles, it helps a lot, My question here is about that campaign when refered to the cassualties, in wich the sources have many discrepances with each other, so i wanted to know, if that could be expanded at the end of the article. And put the cassualties on the sides at 300,000 French deaths, 50,000 wounded, 50,000 prisioners, and 80,000 deserters. Thus giving the more realistic 480,000 cassualties. An edit who you had made before expanding it on the infobox. If so, let me know and help. The same with the orders of battle who i saw you are paying a lot of atention, just to not acumulate so many information on the infobox. Cordially regards and pardon my english. Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 22:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
I thank you for your answer, thus said i want to ask about the casualties, if i could do some changes without ruin your improvements, for example to avoid the estimation of more casualties than soldiers comited into the campaign, and give an average. Of course based on the sources, and either include the prisioners who died in captivity as deaths or prisioners, with a breakdown below. Cordially regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 20:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Also another question. At the battle of Shevardino, we should iclude Napoleon as comander? and did the French actually won? or the Russians achieved their strategic goal of delay the Frenchs? Regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 23:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou for your answer, yes i got it, just i wanted to know a bit about that. I also try to not touch the results so much, because then ends in edit wars, regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 20:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Ruedi33a. Once again i am here, first to congratulate you, for your new maps and navigation templates. However i saw who there was indeed a different title between Spanish uprising 1808, to Napoleon coup'd etat. So i take the "liberty", to rename it back to Spanish uprising 1808, also there are other boxes were the same happen, but as i know who before there were many duplicated ones, etc, i don't intend to modify. Just i want to told you why i had done it. And of course hope who this do not interfere with your labor, please let me know. Sincere regards. Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 17:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ruedi33a, i know who you are doing pretty intresting and hard work during the last days, but i want to ask you a consult about the "Fall of Berlin", is not who you are wrong but (you made an edit who imply who the capture of the city was a battle), in it said French Victory, and comanders Napoleon and Michel Ney. I reverted those edits, and changed the result to (Frenchs ocuppy Berlin) and eliminated the comander sections. I want to tell you because i didn't realize it was you, but now i want to explain myself, (The absence of a battle to take it, but rather an effect from the Jena campaign, doesn't seem apropiate to put ("French victory") and put comanders is not maybe the best as there was no battle in place. (and also why Ney?), in any case i want to know your point, because i explained why. But as you may know, a certain (and persistent) user (FDW... wants to mantain it as it was. of course it does not have anything to do with the article but rather because he dislikes me, and acts in that way is doing it in every edit). I certainly want to know your perspective, on the battlebox, because you are a compromised user who try to improve the wikipedia, and i have serious doubts of that being the best way to put fowards a no battle (yet important issue). I sorry for telling you what is happening here with other user, but the truth is who i want to avoid that user, and go to a good faith editor. Should keep the comander section, and the French Victory? or you don't have problem if i modify it? Please excuse my intomision and my rustic english. Cordially regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 00:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
If there are something who i could do to help please do not doubt in contacting me. I am here to help when i can. Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 17:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, i am here again for your great work in the comunity, with the colors, and your work, again to thank you. But also i wonder why you put Napoleon as "not in comand" or "subordinate" in Toulon and "Paris", where even if he is not the first name he was indeed a comander. (on the 13 of Vendemiaire he was the military head) and at Toulon he was the planner, and de facto comander. I understand what you are trying to do, but i want to make you aware of those facts. (Napoleon served as a subordinate at the 1st Battle of Dego, La Maddalena, and Lyon, if i am not mistaken), but that is why he is not listed as a comander. Nevertheless is just a sugestion, and i know you have a lot of job, and do a wonder job, so those facts are minor, and i want to be clear who i thank you for those contributions. Cordially regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 09:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Also at the Russian campaign, your job again is your best there, however, Napoleon in comand is pointing towards, the battles like Mayaroslavets Vyazma and those who the main body of the French army fought, of course i am not controling you, but just i talk to you rather than do something who could damage your work. Regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 09:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
I don't know but maybe i could initate a project, or something about this, and maybe put a red link after Mayaroslavets with the name there, unless somebody do it first. (especially because i am working with sources who altought i understand, as you could see, my grammar is poor at best. Anyways cordially regards, and good luck, if you need who someone do some minor edits, or sources, talk to my page or here, i have no problem. (and thankyou for your recent edits) Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 18:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Ruedi33a: I think your maps for the Silesian Wars were a great addition to the article, and all the articles you put them into. I think they are a great way to link material with a common visual, and give a good sense of the geography of Frederick II's campaigns. Thanks! Wtfiv ( talk) 02:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
(BTW: if you reply on your home page, please use a reply template to let me know. I only saw your reply because I returned to your page regarding the request for the map label. Otherwise, I would have missed your note and not known about the other maps!) Wtfiv ( talk) 19:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! I had played with adding Berlin myself as just a label, but realized that the label comes with a mark on the interactive map. I think the raid on Berlin is a good compromise, and if another editor objects, we can go from there. But it's nice seeing Berlin on the map! (Thinking about it further, I think reminding readers that Frederick did temporarily lose Berlin is worthwhile too.) Wtfiv ( talk) 08:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
The da Vinci Barnstar | ||
I hereby award you The da Vinci Barnstar for your creation and advocacy of using OSM maps to help people get a sense of the geographic relationships of interrelated sites. It is a great option for editors and really helps readers! Wtfiv ( talk) 16:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC) |
Your work on Rome is great too! Quite a challenge, but quite worthwhile! Wtfiv ( talk) 16:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
... for your work on List of sculptures by Henry Moore. Like --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
... List of sculptures by Camille Claudel. I thought I liked her work all I could, but you've extended my appreciation. Greatest female sculptor (GOAT)? Randy Kryn ( talk) 15:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Ruedi33a, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. 12:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I've watching many of your recent edits, and first i want to thank you for your new articles, it helps a lot, My question here is about that campaign when refered to the cassualties, in wich the sources have many discrepances with each other, so i wanted to know, if that could be expanded at the end of the article. And put the cassualties on the sides at 300,000 French deaths, 50,000 wounded, 50,000 prisioners, and 80,000 deserters. Thus giving the more realistic 480,000 cassualties. An edit who you had made before expanding it on the infobox. If so, let me know and help. The same with the orders of battle who i saw you are paying a lot of atention, just to not acumulate so many information on the infobox. Cordially regards and pardon my english. Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 22:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
I thank you for your answer, thus said i want to ask about the casualties, if i could do some changes without ruin your improvements, for example to avoid the estimation of more casualties than soldiers comited into the campaign, and give an average. Of course based on the sources, and either include the prisioners who died in captivity as deaths or prisioners, with a breakdown below. Cordially regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 20:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Also another question. At the battle of Shevardino, we should iclude Napoleon as comander? and did the French actually won? or the Russians achieved their strategic goal of delay the Frenchs? Regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 23:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
Thankyou for your answer, yes i got it, just i wanted to know a bit about that. I also try to not touch the results so much, because then ends in edit wars, regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 20:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Ruedi33a. Once again i am here, first to congratulate you, for your new maps and navigation templates. However i saw who there was indeed a different title between Spanish uprising 1808, to Napoleon coup'd etat. So i take the "liberty", to rename it back to Spanish uprising 1808, also there are other boxes were the same happen, but as i know who before there were many duplicated ones, etc, i don't intend to modify. Just i want to told you why i had done it. And of course hope who this do not interfere with your labor, please let me know. Sincere regards. Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 17:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello Ruedi33a, i know who you are doing pretty intresting and hard work during the last days, but i want to ask you a consult about the "Fall of Berlin", is not who you are wrong but (you made an edit who imply who the capture of the city was a battle), in it said French Victory, and comanders Napoleon and Michel Ney. I reverted those edits, and changed the result to (Frenchs ocuppy Berlin) and eliminated the comander sections. I want to tell you because i didn't realize it was you, but now i want to explain myself, (The absence of a battle to take it, but rather an effect from the Jena campaign, doesn't seem apropiate to put ("French victory") and put comanders is not maybe the best as there was no battle in place. (and also why Ney?), in any case i want to know your point, because i explained why. But as you may know, a certain (and persistent) user (FDW... wants to mantain it as it was. of course it does not have anything to do with the article but rather because he dislikes me, and acts in that way is doing it in every edit). I certainly want to know your perspective, on the battlebox, because you are a compromised user who try to improve the wikipedia, and i have serious doubts of that being the best way to put fowards a no battle (yet important issue). I sorry for telling you what is happening here with other user, but the truth is who i want to avoid that user, and go to a good faith editor. Should keep the comander section, and the French Victory? or you don't have problem if i modify it? Please excuse my intomision and my rustic english. Cordially regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 00:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
If there are something who i could do to help please do not doubt in contacting me. I am here to help when i can. Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 17:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, i am here again for your great work in the comunity, with the colors, and your work, again to thank you. But also i wonder why you put Napoleon as "not in comand" or "subordinate" in Toulon and "Paris", where even if he is not the first name he was indeed a comander. (on the 13 of Vendemiaire he was the military head) and at Toulon he was the planner, and de facto comander. I understand what you are trying to do, but i want to make you aware of those facts. (Napoleon served as a subordinate at the 1st Battle of Dego, La Maddalena, and Lyon, if i am not mistaken), but that is why he is not listed as a comander. Nevertheless is just a sugestion, and i know you have a lot of job, and do a wonder job, so those facts are minor, and i want to be clear who i thank you for those contributions. Cordially regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 09:24, 13 July 2021 (UTC) Also at the Russian campaign, your job again is your best there, however, Napoleon in comand is pointing towards, the battles like Mayaroslavets Vyazma and those who the main body of the French army fought, of course i am not controling you, but just i talk to you rather than do something who could damage your work. Regards Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 09:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
I don't know but maybe i could initate a project, or something about this, and maybe put a red link after Mayaroslavets with the name there, unless somebody do it first. (especially because i am working with sources who altought i understand, as you could see, my grammar is poor at best. Anyways cordially regards, and good luck, if you need who someone do some minor edits, or sources, talk to my page or here, i have no problem. (and thankyou for your recent edits) Nuevousuario1011 ( talk) 18:39, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Ruedi33a: I think your maps for the Silesian Wars were a great addition to the article, and all the articles you put them into. I think they are a great way to link material with a common visual, and give a good sense of the geography of Frederick II's campaigns. Thanks! Wtfiv ( talk) 02:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
(BTW: if you reply on your home page, please use a reply template to let me know. I only saw your reply because I returned to your page regarding the request for the map label. Otherwise, I would have missed your note and not known about the other maps!) Wtfiv ( talk) 19:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! I had played with adding Berlin myself as just a label, but realized that the label comes with a mark on the interactive map. I think the raid on Berlin is a good compromise, and if another editor objects, we can go from there. But it's nice seeing Berlin on the map! (Thinking about it further, I think reminding readers that Frederick did temporarily lose Berlin is worthwhile too.) Wtfiv ( talk) 08:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
The da Vinci Barnstar | ||
I hereby award you The da Vinci Barnstar for your creation and advocacy of using OSM maps to help people get a sense of the geographic relationships of interrelated sites. It is a great option for editors and really helps readers! Wtfiv ( talk) 16:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC) |
Your work on Rome is great too! Quite a challenge, but quite worthwhile! Wtfiv ( talk) 16:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
... for your work on List of sculptures by Henry Moore. Like --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
... List of sculptures by Camille Claudel. I thought I liked her work all I could, but you've extended my appreciation. Greatest female sculptor (GOAT)? Randy Kryn ( talk) 15:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)