Welcome!
Hello, Rubén Mar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
CitiCat
♫
18:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the welcome and tips!
I´d like to now split the article into the two language versions.
¿Should I go ahead, and remove the "Delete" template and do this?
Regards Rubén Mar 10:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a place for your personal essays but is a collaborative encyclopaedia, thus you must respect it's times for discussion as well as respect the voting, IMO your article is a mere rant, as the ones done by the pro-gender violence people many times. just leave things like they are and let others collaborate. Zape82 10:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello Zape82, that´s very insulting saying "your article is a mere rant, as the ones done by the pro-gender violence people".
You are a Political Science student studying in Madrid, right? And from your personal page I see that you may be aligned, politically-speaking, to the left, as is the current government, is that correct?
I notice you removed from José Luis R. Zapatero´s page the addition regarding his party´s achievement of creating these courts, without good reason IMHO. If the gay marriage Law was an acceptable achievement for you, why not the Courts for Violence Against Women?
Do you find it a problem to read comments from Spain´s General Council of Judicial Power (CGPD) that are concerned that these Courts give rise to Constitutional issues?
This article is a combination of basic facts, references to the Court´s basic purpose, relevant Law, articles of the Constitution, and links to groups, firstly, that support the Courts, and then those that are concerned about the Constitutional issues. Is that not the truth? ¿No es la verdad?
¿Where is the "rant" in my article, please tell me and I´ll remove it immediately?
I would really welcome contructive comments should you make one. Rubén Mar 10:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I was a law and political science student and yes I am aligned with the left but not with the current government and just to clarify:
Zape82 11:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I disagree totally, and I will explain why point for point.
I do detail the motives for the law "to provide protection for women from domestic violence" and other such comments. I even reprint the article from Amnesty on how women were so underprotected in the past!!! The deplorable fact, as you say, that 60 women were killed by men in Spain in 2007, does not allow the suppression of the right of freedome of free speech by the largely legal groups that claim, and I use the word claim, there is a constitutional conflict in allowing one group of society legal powers over another group. The article provides facts and opposing views, I do not give my opinion, take a look at it one more time please. Its lucky you´re not a student of road traffic because maybe you´d lobby to close the motorways in Spain because there were 3,016 road deaths in 2006, and around 4,000 last year! Not 60 or 70, but THREE THOUSAND PEOPLE DIED!! My opinion is that this issue needs, and that it is healthy, to air it, in a balanced way. If there are any weaknesses or imbalances in this article, lets improve it, not erase it as you have requested. I have removed my Editors Comments text about the two main concepts, 1. that the Courts are needed and must stay, and the other 2. that the Law and Courts may be conflicting constitutional right of a specific social group, and changes need be considered - I gave both views. Anyway, I removed those points in case it would be viewed as "leading". ¿But why are you so critical, why not helpful? You even criticise the quality of the article! :) In addition, I have spoken with several lawyers, some friends of mine, and police, and many have raised their concerns as to the situation, and I think it is widely known in Spain that there are problems that need to be considered:- its a public issue, and could soon be a European issue which makes it worth improving, not erasing! Rubén Mar 12:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
While it is easy to create alternative accounts, we have a policy against their abuse and misuse. It has been confirmed that you have used multiple acounts. I can't see that you had previously been aware of the policy. The alternative account was used in the same location as the original account, which is a violation of the policy. Accordingly, your alternative account has been blocked indefinitely, but since you may have been unaware that its use was unacceptable you are only being blocked for a day. GRBerry 22:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors.
Zape82
18:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I have replied to your message. —dgies t c 18:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Digital Signage Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
09:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Digital Signage Software. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot ( talk) 10:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:FIDS - A New Viewpoint-A3.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor ( talk) 18:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FIDS - A New Viewpoint-A3.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor ( talk) 18:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:FIDS - A New Viewpoint-A3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor ( talk) 18:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Sentel Advance ViewPoint mid screen shots.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 21:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FIDS A New Viewpoint A3 2005 12.pdf, which you've sourced to www.sentel-advance.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Rubén Mar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
CitiCat
♫
18:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for the welcome and tips!
I´d like to now split the article into the two language versions.
¿Should I go ahead, and remove the "Delete" template and do this?
Regards Rubén Mar 10:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a place for your personal essays but is a collaborative encyclopaedia, thus you must respect it's times for discussion as well as respect the voting, IMO your article is a mere rant, as the ones done by the pro-gender violence people many times. just leave things like they are and let others collaborate. Zape82 10:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello Zape82, that´s very insulting saying "your article is a mere rant, as the ones done by the pro-gender violence people".
You are a Political Science student studying in Madrid, right? And from your personal page I see that you may be aligned, politically-speaking, to the left, as is the current government, is that correct?
I notice you removed from José Luis R. Zapatero´s page the addition regarding his party´s achievement of creating these courts, without good reason IMHO. If the gay marriage Law was an acceptable achievement for you, why not the Courts for Violence Against Women?
Do you find it a problem to read comments from Spain´s General Council of Judicial Power (CGPD) that are concerned that these Courts give rise to Constitutional issues?
This article is a combination of basic facts, references to the Court´s basic purpose, relevant Law, articles of the Constitution, and links to groups, firstly, that support the Courts, and then those that are concerned about the Constitutional issues. Is that not the truth? ¿No es la verdad?
¿Where is the "rant" in my article, please tell me and I´ll remove it immediately?
I would really welcome contructive comments should you make one. Rubén Mar 10:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I was a law and political science student and yes I am aligned with the left but not with the current government and just to clarify:
Zape82 11:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
I disagree totally, and I will explain why point for point.
I do detail the motives for the law "to provide protection for women from domestic violence" and other such comments. I even reprint the article from Amnesty on how women were so underprotected in the past!!! The deplorable fact, as you say, that 60 women were killed by men in Spain in 2007, does not allow the suppression of the right of freedome of free speech by the largely legal groups that claim, and I use the word claim, there is a constitutional conflict in allowing one group of society legal powers over another group. The article provides facts and opposing views, I do not give my opinion, take a look at it one more time please. Its lucky you´re not a student of road traffic because maybe you´d lobby to close the motorways in Spain because there were 3,016 road deaths in 2006, and around 4,000 last year! Not 60 or 70, but THREE THOUSAND PEOPLE DIED!! My opinion is that this issue needs, and that it is healthy, to air it, in a balanced way. If there are any weaknesses or imbalances in this article, lets improve it, not erase it as you have requested. I have removed my Editors Comments text about the two main concepts, 1. that the Courts are needed and must stay, and the other 2. that the Law and Courts may be conflicting constitutional right of a specific social group, and changes need be considered - I gave both views. Anyway, I removed those points in case it would be viewed as "leading". ¿But why are you so critical, why not helpful? You even criticise the quality of the article! :) In addition, I have spoken with several lawyers, some friends of mine, and police, and many have raised their concerns as to the situation, and I think it is widely known in Spain that there are problems that need to be considered:- its a public issue, and could soon be a European issue which makes it worth improving, not erasing! Rubén Mar 12:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
While it is easy to create alternative accounts, we have a policy against their abuse and misuse. It has been confirmed that you have used multiple acounts. I can't see that you had previously been aware of the policy. The alternative account was used in the same location as the original account, which is a violation of the policy. Accordingly, your alternative account has been blocked indefinitely, but since you may have been unaware that its use was unacceptable you are only being blocked for a day. GRBerry 22:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors.
Zape82
18:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I have replied to your message. —dgies t c 18:41, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Digital Signage Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Mr. Vernon (
talk)
09:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Digital Signage Software. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot ( talk) 10:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:FIDS - A New Viewpoint-A3.pdf. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor ( talk) 18:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FIDS - A New Viewpoint-A3.pdf. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor ( talk) 18:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:FIDS - A New Viewpoint-A3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor ( talk) 18:17, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Sentel Advance ViewPoint mid screen shots.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock (TALK) 21:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FIDS A New Viewpoint A3 2005 12.pdf, which you've sourced to www.sentel-advance.com. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)