Hi Rsmaravi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

The article Hashmukh chudgar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 12:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hasmukh Chudgar. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hasmukh chudgar. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hasmukh chudgar. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 12:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Hasmukh Chudgar into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Content copied from Intas Biopharmaceuticals. Eostrix  ( ^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 12:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Your edit to Hasmukh Chudgar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Content copied from https://www.forbes.com/profile/hasmukh-chudgar/?sh=4d1b6b805a65 and https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/meet-intas-chudgars-who-silently-made-to-the-top-116100600216_1.html Eostrix  ( ^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 12:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Hasmukh Chudgar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 12:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that you need to be crossed. S Philbrick (Talk) 12:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Hasmukh chudgar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 13:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm KN2731. An edit that you recently made to Dilip Shanghvi seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ~  KN2731 { talk · contribs} 12:49, 2 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Rsmaravi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hasmukh Chudgar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 13:02, 19 October 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello. Your recent edit to List of Jains appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay ( talk) 17:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Rsmaravi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Hasmukh Chudgar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 ( talk) 12:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, Rsmaravi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Hasmukh chudgar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:17, 19 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, U. N. Mehta, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay ( talk) 15:41, 6 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Samir Mehta, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay ( talk) 15:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Samir Mehta, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - Arjayay ( talk) 15:42, 6 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jains, you may be blocked from editing.
That list clearly states ♦♦♦ Please keep the list in alphabetical order by LAST NAME ♦♦♦ but you messed up that order into a random mix - 15:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jains.
It was clearly explained, in the warning immediately above, "That list clearly states ♦♦♦ Please keep the list in alphabetical order by LAST NAME ♦♦♦ but you messed up that order into a random mix" - you have just repeated the same vandalism - Arjayay ( talk) 11:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jains.
It was clearly explained, twice above, that the list clearly states "♦♦♦ Please keep the list in alphabetical order by LAST NAME ♦♦♦" but you keep vandalizing the order. Please STOP before you are blocked - Arjayay ( talk) 10:29, 25 January 2023 (UTC) reply

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of Jains, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
It is clearly explained, three times above, that the list clearly states "♦♦♦ Please keep the list in alphabetical order by LAST NAME ♦♦♦" but you keep vandalizing the order. Please STOP before you are blocked - Arjayay ( talk) 11:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Jains, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A " bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 07:07, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jains. As clearly explained, four times above, that list clearly states "♦♦♦ Please keep the list in alphabetical order by LAST NAME ♦♦♦" but you keep vandalizing the order. Please STOP before you are blocked - Arjayay ( talk) 12:43, 29 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of Jains, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay ( talk) 14:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Virji Vora. - Arjayay ( talk) 14:18, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply

He is not a jain at all, but a gujarati hindu vaishnav. He biography clearly states that fact. Please stop changing it unnecessarily KRFAAR ( talk) 08:49, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

DILIP IS A HINDU KAPOL BANIA AND HAS NOTHING DO TO WITH JAINISM. SOMA DAS WAS THE AUTHOR SELECTED BY DILIP AND HIS FAMILY TO RESEARCH AND WRITE ABOUT HIS LIFE. HIS BIOGRAPHY CLEARLY STATES HE IS A DEVOTEE OF SHRINATH JI(CHILD FORM OF KRISHNA) AND REGULARLY MAKES PILIGIRMAGE WITH HIS FAMILY TO RAJASTHAN. HE WAS BORN IN A KAPOL HINDU FAMILY AND IN HIS OFFICES THERE ARE PHOTOS OF SRINATH JI. SHANGVI IS NOT A JAIN EXCLUSIVE SURNAME, MANY OTHER COMMUNITIES USE IT TOO WHICH ARE OLDER THAN EXISTENCE OF JAINISM. SO READ HIS BIOGRAPHY AND ALSO CHECK UNDER FORBES DO YOU KNOW SECTION. STOP VANDALSINGTHE PAGE, INSTEAD READ AND GET BETTER SOURCES INSTEAD OF FAKE ARTICLES.

CHECK PAGE 30, 581 IN HIS BIOGRAPHY:

https://www.google.co.in/books/edition/The_Reluctant_Billionaire/Q92ZDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0

ALSO CHECK HIS FORBES PAGE, UNDER DID YOU KNOW SECTION:

https://www.forbes.com/profile/dilip-shanghvi/?sh=48593011f812 KRFAAR ( talk) 10:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

@ KRFAAR

Respected KRFAAR Sir ,

I want to inform you that , Dilip Shanghvi is Jain as I regular meet him in several occasions. The Biography you are talking about is written by Soma Das which is not selected and approved by Dilip shanghvi and their family members. she not true in this aspects.The Sources of The Reluctant Billionaire is weak enough which cannot define to be Gujarati Hindu Kapol Vaishnav.As i personally know Dilip shanghvi and all their family members their parents Shantilal Shanghvi and mother Kumud Shanghvi appeared in several Jain festivals and Social Events.He is Strictly Vegeterian.The Meaning of Shanghvi surname is Jain People undertake Jain pilgrims for pilgrimage,there several websites in Internet clearly shows that he belongs to Jain community.I dont know why some people changes this essential information without checking the facts . Rsmaravi ( talk) 19:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC) reply

AGAIN ALL HOGWASH, ALL LIES. SHANGVI IS NOT A SURNAME USED ONLY BY JAINS. SOMA DAS WAS INSTRUCTED BY SHANGHVIS TO MAKE THEIR BIOGRAPHIES AND YOU ARE SAYING ITS FALSE? WHAT NONSENSE, THEN WHAT EXPLAINS THE FACT THAT SUN PHARMA FACTORIES HAVE SHRINATHJIS PHOTOS AND NOT PHOTO OF ANY JAIN GURU OR TIRTHANKAR. SO ENOUGH WITH YOUR LIES. KRFAAR ( talk) 06:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply

YOU ARE CLAIMING THAT SOMA DAS NEVER MET DILIP SHANGAVI WHICH IS FALSE. READ THIS ARTICLE BY CNBC WHICH CLEARLY TELLS THAT SOMA DAS MET DILIP SHANGVI AND 150 FREINDS AND EMPLOYEES. SO AGAIN YOU ARE CLEARLY LIEING ABOUT KNOWING HIM PERSONALLY. BELOW IS THE ARTICLE:

https://www.cnbctv18.com/buzz/biography-of-medicine-mogul-dilip-shanghvi-the-founder-of-sun-pharma-to-hit-stores-soon-3337991.htm

AND THE ARTICLE CLEARLY STATES:

The biography titled “The Reluctant Billionaire: How Dilip Shanghvi became the richest self-made Indian' is the untold human story of an enterprise and its creator.

The book is based on interviews with over 150 friends, family members, rivals, former aides, and Dilip Shanghvi himself.

AGAIN SHANGVI IS NOT A JAIN EXCLUSIVE SURNAME ONLY, HINDU COMMUNITY HAS BEEN USING IT BEFORE EVEN THE EXISTENCE OF JAINISM.

NOW ALSO GIVE PROOF OF HIS FAMILY JOINING ANY JAIN FESTIVAL OR GURU, AGAIN YOU ARE DOING DIRTY WORK BY SPREADING LIES. HE IS NOT PART OF ANY JAIN ORGANISATION OR HAS MET ANY JAIN GURU.

LAST THING IS HIS SUN PHARMA FACTORY AND OFFICES HAVE IDOLS OF SHRINATHJI (CHILD FORM OF LORD KRISHNA) SO STOP SPREADING LIES. THIS FACT IS VERIFIED BY HIS FORBES PAGE, UNDER THE DO YOU KNOW PAGE. HIS FACTORIES DON'T HAVE ANY PHOOS OF JAIN TIRTHANKARS.

READ:

https://www.forbes.com/profile/dilip-shanghvi/?sh=c7ccc46f812b

AND READ HIS BIOGRAPHY PAGE 30 AND 581 WHICH CLEARLY SAY HE IS A KAPOLE BANIA AND NOT JAIN.

https://books.google.co.in/books/about/The_Reluctant_Billionaire.html?id=Q92ZDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

STOP CLAIMING DILIP SHANGVI AS A JAIN AND STOP VANADALISING IT. KRFAAR ( talk) 07:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dilip Shanghvi, you may be blocked from editing.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 23:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC) reply