Welcome!
Hello, Roughstrikes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Rich
Farmbrough,
14:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC).
You have to be a little more precise - which edits are disruptive and why? have you tried to talk to these editors?
Rich
Farmbrough,
14:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC).
sure, will give explanation The user 180.106.5.60, 117.82.98.99 have used senseless edits and peacock terms like extraordinary, Most popular and extremly talented, to spoil the integrity and quality of article and are used excessively to defame and mask some of the facts in the article. some edits are also being done in removing the reflist Tag in the references section.
I request a strong scrutiny and surveillance on this article on the use of Unexplained edits by any IP ADDRESS AND USE OF PEACOCK TERMS. IN THE NEXT DUBIOUS EDIT USING PEACOCK TERMS OR DISRUPTING REFERENCE TAGS, PLEASE UNDO THE EDIT AND SEMI PROTECT THE ARTICLE.
I am not interested in things like Height of the person. What I look for is a semi protection of this article.
And peacock term which try to mislead real facts of the article.
( Roughstrikes ( talk) 15:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)).
The article is full of vague uncited information. X was a "super hit". I agree the IP additions are even worse than the article as it was, but not by a lot. They can be removed and talked about, the rule is "Bold, Revert Discuss" - not "Bold, revert, protect." I have made a start on cleaning up the article.
Rich
Farmbrough,
15:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC).
Unfortunately that image is likely to be copyright. You can request an image by adding {{
Image requested}} to the talk page. Or if you can get an image released under CC-by-sa ideally uploaded by the creator, we can use that.
Rich
Farmbrough,
16:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC).
will try,
I presume - the below image is by the originator, since it has a tag
''http://www.teluguone.com/cinema/gallery/Nagarjuna/nagarjuna1.jpg''
and further, I can post {{ Image requested}} to this talk page???
Welcome!
Hello, Roughstrikes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Rich
Farmbrough,
14:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC).
You have to be a little more precise - which edits are disruptive and why? have you tried to talk to these editors?
Rich
Farmbrough,
14:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC).
sure, will give explanation The user 180.106.5.60, 117.82.98.99 have used senseless edits and peacock terms like extraordinary, Most popular and extremly talented, to spoil the integrity and quality of article and are used excessively to defame and mask some of the facts in the article. some edits are also being done in removing the reflist Tag in the references section.
I request a strong scrutiny and surveillance on this article on the use of Unexplained edits by any IP ADDRESS AND USE OF PEACOCK TERMS. IN THE NEXT DUBIOUS EDIT USING PEACOCK TERMS OR DISRUPTING REFERENCE TAGS, PLEASE UNDO THE EDIT AND SEMI PROTECT THE ARTICLE.
I am not interested in things like Height of the person. What I look for is a semi protection of this article.
And peacock term which try to mislead real facts of the article.
( Roughstrikes ( talk) 15:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)).
The article is full of vague uncited information. X was a "super hit". I agree the IP additions are even worse than the article as it was, but not by a lot. They can be removed and talked about, the rule is "Bold, Revert Discuss" - not "Bold, revert, protect." I have made a start on cleaning up the article.
Rich
Farmbrough,
15:40, 13 November 2010 (UTC).
Unfortunately that image is likely to be copyright. You can request an image by adding {{
Image requested}} to the talk page. Or if you can get an image released under CC-by-sa ideally uploaded by the creator, we can use that.
Rich
Farmbrough,
16:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC).
will try,
I presume - the below image is by the originator, since it has a tag
''http://www.teluguone.com/cinema/gallery/Nagarjuna/nagarjuna1.jpg''
and further, I can post {{ Image requested}} to this talk page???