Number of times this page has been vandalized: 5
Regarding the articles on individual Eurovans - please have a look at the main Eurovan article, you will find that all the information contained in the individual ones is there plus much more. In case of Fiat Ulysse specifically, it is all actually in the introduction. Regards, Bravada, talk - 20:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
See GT's talk page. ForestH2
See GT's talk page again. ForestH2
Rory, your bot recently bypassed a cross-namespace redirect on WP:RfD that was being considered for deletion [1]. This is probably not a very good idea, and so I was wondering if you could perhaps have your bot skip the WP:RfD page. Thanks. AmiDaniel ( talk) 03:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Your bot hit my talk page. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Mine too. I would rather have broken links on there than get spurious "New Messages" banners. Can you keep it off userspace? — Chowbok 15:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Please alter your bot so it does not alter any more talk pages. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 06:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 23 | 5 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Hey, first off, thanks for voting in my Rfa. It probably won't pass, but a man can still hope :D . Anyway, I looked at your user page, and was wondering why you aren't an admin yet? I was wondering if after my Rfa I could nominate you. Shalom, Thetruthbelow (talk) 08:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Just saw it and I have to say that for some reason people don't get elected that aren't here for a while Oh no! That means me!. Well, I think you would be a good admin, as we have worked together in the past and I liked your edits. Anyway, whenever you do decide to run, I will definetly be a Strong Support. Thanks, Thetruthbelow (talk) 08:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Your bot "corrected" Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion again [2]. I've reverted it. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 19:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rory, I am not really sure what WP is looking for as a rational. If the photo stays, that would be good, if it gets yanked, well ok. But I am not sure what is being asked here, beyond a simple claim of fair use. If I had a better idea of what is being asked, I would be more than happy to comply. Thanks, Brimba 06:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Rory096/Archive12, and thank you for voting on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! Kukini 05:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC) |
I think that it should be deleted. FellowWikip e dian 22:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
You had stated "Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you" Now it is not considered nonsense if you have the male private part, but not the female's private part in that sentence or that intro paragraph. Was the phrase "inbetween the person's legs" implying female, whoever wrote that can do much better. Though i am a male, women would find that inaccurate information to only say the male's private part. I tried to find the better word, which is why i had changed my input that goldon apparently saw and wrote me. Pretty straight-forward that you and goldon/whoever are males. It is not vandalism, call it what you want. I was not trying to be funny, wonder why you took it like that?
june 10, 2:24 am. majinsnake —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Majinsnake ( talk • contribs) .
I pulled the {{ db-vand}} tag off of this upload, at least to me this is not obvious vandalism, can you elaborate? — xaosflux Talk 11:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there! Even those Blake Clark is misspelled and the fact the article is completely misformatted a quick IMDB search shows, this is not speedy worthy. If you're credited as yourself, that's usually because people know you by that name. Anyway, since the creator said he was often in films with Adam Sandler, I'd say it's a small claim to notability. I'll fix it up and see how you like it, but please be careful where you put those speedies. - Mgm| (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rory096. I noticed you tested out my Image Autotagger, I hope you find it useful. If there are any feature requests you'd like to make, just let me know. I haven't been working on it recently, but I'll get back into development soon enough. Have fun! ~ MDD 46 96 01:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Could you explain, in detail, how removing unverifiable dicdefs and their unreliable sources from an article is, to quote your chosen policy, "disruptive", "experimental", "spiteful" and "unencyclopedic"? Particularly given the healthy discussion on the talk page, which you don't seem to have contributed to yet? - Splash - tk 07:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
AcronymFinder, I'm not so sure about. They don't cite their sources, they link you quickly to commercial sites and they don't seem to be published by someone I've heard of. Do you know more about them? - Splash - tk 07:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry there, User:Larry V actually did correct some of the mispellings but missed the ones you caught... I just didn't realize that. Thanks! :-) Netscott 07:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry for not replying sooner. Yes this one is pretty debatable but, because there was some information in the templates and it looks like it could become a valid article, I decided to err on the side of caution. In the circumstances, I might take it upon myself to expand the article slightly. Cheers TigerShark 10:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
What did you mean by "customizability"? I'm the one who originally put the gas fact up... so it's old and I'll have to change it. Do you use the C.N. userbox somewhere? -- FairNBalanced 19:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Could of just messaged me, I was on. Some of the stuff wasnt't a direct link, I admit it, but stuff like " Multi-User Shared Habitat" is. Also, this is a list of slang, not acronims. I would really, though, like to take all this crap and soft redirect it to wikitonary. Any way you know of doing that?-- Rayc 19:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
You caught me in the middle of marking As of April 2006 and As of May 2006, but thanks for the reminder... 66.167.252.27 07:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC).
A big thanks for your beat-the-nominator support. As for your bidding, well... unless it involves deleting the Main Page, blocking Jimbo, protecting the Sandbox, etc. etc., I'm happy to help – Gurch 15:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
You changed all of my edits. I had changed that sentence which I did not write and did not add, before you simply deleted everything I did. MollyBloom 00:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC) There is NO cut and paste from my edits. I was in the process of trying to reword, in fact, when you reverted ALL of my edits. I had also changed a paragraph that was there previously (I did not add) that was a direct cut and paste from a website. MollyBloom 01:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 24 | 12 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 01:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for being extremely diligent in tagging images that are orphaned. I just wanted to let you know that those images I uploaded weren't orphaned at all, I had just uploaded them and you must have tagged them in between the time of upload and use in an article. Oh, and I was wondering if you could review my claims of fair use rationale on those three images and let me know if their sufficient or even applicable? I haven't dealt with many fair use images before. Thanks! - Rkitko 02:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
File:Motherussia.jpg | Hello Rory096, and thank you for your support at my request for adminship, which ended with an awe-inspiring 86/1/2 result. I plan to do much with my shiny new tools - but I'll start slow and learn the ropes at first. Please deluge me with assignments and requests - I enjoy helping out. For Mother Russia!! - CrazyRussian talk/ contribs/ email 04:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC) |
Rory096, thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for adminship, it passed with a final tally of (65/3/3) - which I find both amazing and humbling. I wish I had time to thank everyone personally, but I'm afraid all I can offer is this token of my gratitude. I hope to live up to your expectations/hopes. If at any stage you need to contact me, for help or a request or to point out a mistake in my conduct, please make sure to tell me on my talk page. -- Fir0002 08:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC) |
Do you know if there is a tag that marks a fair use image as needing to be replaced with one of a lower resolution? -- Hetar 01:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to comment that you probably shouldn't be so quick to label things as vandalism, as you did here, here, and here. The user seemed be trying to improve the page, and userpages are allowed to be edited by anybody. Thank you for your time. Ch u ck (contrib) 07:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
I found it confusing that PYT directed to the band rather than the song, which I was looking for. therefore, i thought that a disambiguation page was the answer. the page "PYT (band)" should not be deleted as it is the new page for the band. thanks. -- Paaerduag 07:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Just an opinion, but isn't the song by Michael Jackson more famous than the band. I mean, i've never heard of the band, but the song is incredibly famous (on the thriller album), and it is the inspiration for the band. I belive that the song should be the first article that appears, and there should be a link to the band. sound alright? -- Paaerduag 07:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Wait, i don't think you understand. I'll show you. just one moment...-- Paaerduag 07:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
There, i'm finished, and as long as PYT (band) is deleted, it'll be alright. the correct way to write the title is "P.Y.T. (band)" anyway, because each letter stands for a different word, as with the song. thanks. -- Paaerduag 07:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
My compliments on the grace with which you handled the recent (most likely clueless) vandalism of Vegetable oils. Well done! Waitak 11:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. I see you just put the page WikiProject Arthropods up for speedy deletion. It used to redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Arthropods. I don't understand why this page should be deleted; if someone does a search for "WikiProject Arthropods" (it doesn't come to every user's mind that a WikiProject is in Wikipedia space, not main space), they will be redirected to the WikiProject. Apparently this was also the idea of the editor who restored the content of the page after it was previously deleted (a process which I did not notice). Could you enlighten me on the reasons of this deletion? Thanks, Iron C hris | (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
You added a comment to a closed RFD ( Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion#Ckatz.2FWorkspace.2FTemplates .E2.86.92 User:Ckatz.2FWorkspace.2FTemplates) awhile back. Did you mean for that comment to actually be for the preceeding debate (about Shelving filter)? It seems to make more sense there. Thought I'd point it out just in case... -- JLaTondre 23:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I took the liberty to change the target of the cross-namespace redirect Wikipedian from Wikipedia:Wikipedian to Wikipedia. I just realized it has 3000+ incoming links, but none is from the article namespace. Could you please orphan it by changing Wikipedian wikilinks to Wikipedia:Wikipedian? -- Zoz (t) 11:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
You wrote:
"no delete arguments were refuted"???
Sigh. So, this is the end – too bad.
I just want you to know; just as the powers that be haven't changed their minds, neither have I. I still insist that this is a wrong decision. I branched the synopsis article from the main film article in an act of good faith. This was the work of many and not any single individual. This user thinks 2001: A Space Odyssey is the best science fiction film ever made; and a 196-word synopsis just does not do the film justice. -- Jason Palpatine 13:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC) speak your mind
Re [3], why both Categories, All orphaned fairuse images and Orphaned fairuse images? It would appear fully redundant. -- Gmaxwell 04:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Try out these links: User:General Eisenhower/Newpages and User:General Eisenhower/Recent Changes. General Eisenhower • ( at war or at peace) 15:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rory, I added the WPCD template to the hydrochloric acid talk page, thinking that by doing that I'd recommend it for the CD-publications. But you reverted the addition with the comment that the article isn't on the CD. Then, how would I recommend a certain article for the CD-publication? Please help? Wim van Dorst ( Talk) 19:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC).
Hey - I just saw an IP strike out your PUI nom so I reverted it, but when I went to leave a note about not striking out entries, I realized it appears to be you. If it was you, feel free to revert my edit. (But please sign in first :-)) - SCEhard T 21:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for voting! Hello Rory096/Archive12, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
-- Pilot| guy 22:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 25 | 19 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello Rory096, and thanks for voting in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of (68/19/3). I appreciated your comments, which I hope to take on board in order to gain your respect in my work as an administrator. Best of luck in your continued editing of the encyclopedia! Sam Vimes 17:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Rory, check the doctor who, tenth doctor page. I got blocked for no reason by that admin. No warning, no nothing.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.252.251.204 ( talk • contribs) .
Pay attention, sometimes people are talking about the redirects. Kotepho 07:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me if I'm wrong, but you're AFD nomination of Raasta makes it look like you consider 2 singles as a end-all requirement. Remember, there's more guidelines in WP:MUSIC, besides the 2-single suggestion. It helps if you touch upon a few of those other guidelines in your nominations too. - Mgm| (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi -- I haven't looked closely at the current reverting at the list of countries, but it seems to be more than simple vandalism, and as such you're going to run afoul of 3RR if you keep reverting it. (I've warned the IP anon as well about this.) Perhaps you could leave a note on the article's talk page about why you don't think the text added should be included? Many thanks. -- Fastfission 19:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 15 minutes. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. AmiDaniel ( talk) 07:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC) |
Number of times this page has been vandalized: 5
Regarding the articles on individual Eurovans - please have a look at the main Eurovan article, you will find that all the information contained in the individual ones is there plus much more. In case of Fiat Ulysse specifically, it is all actually in the introduction. Regards, Bravada, talk - 20:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
See GT's talk page. ForestH2
See GT's talk page again. ForestH2
Rory, your bot recently bypassed a cross-namespace redirect on WP:RfD that was being considered for deletion [1]. This is probably not a very good idea, and so I was wondering if you could perhaps have your bot skip the WP:RfD page. Thanks. AmiDaniel ( talk) 03:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Your bot hit my talk page. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Mine too. I would rather have broken links on there than get spurious "New Messages" banners. Can you keep it off userspace? — Chowbok 15:17, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Please alter your bot so it does not alter any more talk pages. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 06:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 23 | 5 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Hey, first off, thanks for voting in my Rfa. It probably won't pass, but a man can still hope :D . Anyway, I looked at your user page, and was wondering why you aren't an admin yet? I was wondering if after my Rfa I could nominate you. Shalom, Thetruthbelow (talk) 08:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Just saw it and I have to say that for some reason people don't get elected that aren't here for a while Oh no! That means me!. Well, I think you would be a good admin, as we have worked together in the past and I liked your edits. Anyway, whenever you do decide to run, I will definetly be a Strong Support. Thanks, Thetruthbelow (talk) 08:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Your bot "corrected" Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion again [2]. I've reverted it. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 19:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rory, I am not really sure what WP is looking for as a rational. If the photo stays, that would be good, if it gets yanked, well ok. But I am not sure what is being asked here, beyond a simple claim of fair use. If I had a better idea of what is being asked, I would be more than happy to comply. Thanks, Brimba 06:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello, Rory096/Archive12, and thank you for voting on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 84/1/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months, but welcome any and all feedback and suggestions on how I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! Kukini 05:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC) |
I think that it should be deleted. FellowWikip e dian 22:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
You had stated "Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you" Now it is not considered nonsense if you have the male private part, but not the female's private part in that sentence or that intro paragraph. Was the phrase "inbetween the person's legs" implying female, whoever wrote that can do much better. Though i am a male, women would find that inaccurate information to only say the male's private part. I tried to find the better word, which is why i had changed my input that goldon apparently saw and wrote me. Pretty straight-forward that you and goldon/whoever are males. It is not vandalism, call it what you want. I was not trying to be funny, wonder why you took it like that?
june 10, 2:24 am. majinsnake —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Majinsnake ( talk • contribs) .
I pulled the {{ db-vand}} tag off of this upload, at least to me this is not obvious vandalism, can you elaborate? — xaosflux Talk 11:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there! Even those Blake Clark is misspelled and the fact the article is completely misformatted a quick IMDB search shows, this is not speedy worthy. If you're credited as yourself, that's usually because people know you by that name. Anyway, since the creator said he was often in films with Adam Sandler, I'd say it's a small claim to notability. I'll fix it up and see how you like it, but please be careful where you put those speedies. - Mgm| (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rory096. I noticed you tested out my Image Autotagger, I hope you find it useful. If there are any feature requests you'd like to make, just let me know. I haven't been working on it recently, but I'll get back into development soon enough. Have fun! ~ MDD 46 96 01:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Could you explain, in detail, how removing unverifiable dicdefs and their unreliable sources from an article is, to quote your chosen policy, "disruptive", "experimental", "spiteful" and "unencyclopedic"? Particularly given the healthy discussion on the talk page, which you don't seem to have contributed to yet? - Splash - tk 07:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
AcronymFinder, I'm not so sure about. They don't cite their sources, they link you quickly to commercial sites and they don't seem to be published by someone I've heard of. Do you know more about them? - Splash - tk 07:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry there, User:Larry V actually did correct some of the mispellings but missed the ones you caught... I just didn't realize that. Thanks! :-) Netscott 07:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry for not replying sooner. Yes this one is pretty debatable but, because there was some information in the templates and it looks like it could become a valid article, I decided to err on the side of caution. In the circumstances, I might take it upon myself to expand the article slightly. Cheers TigerShark 10:11, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
What did you mean by "customizability"? I'm the one who originally put the gas fact up... so it's old and I'll have to change it. Do you use the C.N. userbox somewhere? -- FairNBalanced 19:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Could of just messaged me, I was on. Some of the stuff wasnt't a direct link, I admit it, but stuff like " Multi-User Shared Habitat" is. Also, this is a list of slang, not acronims. I would really, though, like to take all this crap and soft redirect it to wikitonary. Any way you know of doing that?-- Rayc 19:59, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
You caught me in the middle of marking As of April 2006 and As of May 2006, but thanks for the reminder... 66.167.252.27 07:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC).
A big thanks for your beat-the-nominator support. As for your bidding, well... unless it involves deleting the Main Page, blocking Jimbo, protecting the Sandbox, etc. etc., I'm happy to help – Gurch 15:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
You changed all of my edits. I had changed that sentence which I did not write and did not add, before you simply deleted everything I did. MollyBloom 00:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC) There is NO cut and paste from my edits. I was in the process of trying to reword, in fact, when you reverted ALL of my edits. I had also changed a paragraph that was there previously (I did not add) that was a direct cut and paste from a website. MollyBloom 01:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 24 | 12 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 01:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for being extremely diligent in tagging images that are orphaned. I just wanted to let you know that those images I uploaded weren't orphaned at all, I had just uploaded them and you must have tagged them in between the time of upload and use in an article. Oh, and I was wondering if you could review my claims of fair use rationale on those three images and let me know if their sufficient or even applicable? I haven't dealt with many fair use images before. Thanks! - Rkitko 02:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
File:Motherussia.jpg | Hello Rory096, and thank you for your support at my request for adminship, which ended with an awe-inspiring 86/1/2 result. I plan to do much with my shiny new tools - but I'll start slow and learn the ropes at first. Please deluge me with assignments and requests - I enjoy helping out. For Mother Russia!! - CrazyRussian talk/ contribs/ email 04:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC) |
Rory096, thank you very much for your support in my recent Request for adminship, it passed with a final tally of (65/3/3) - which I find both amazing and humbling. I wish I had time to thank everyone personally, but I'm afraid all I can offer is this token of my gratitude. I hope to live up to your expectations/hopes. If at any stage you need to contact me, for help or a request or to point out a mistake in my conduct, please make sure to tell me on my talk page. -- Fir0002 08:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC) |
Do you know if there is a tag that marks a fair use image as needing to be replaced with one of a lower resolution? -- Hetar 01:25, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to comment that you probably shouldn't be so quick to label things as vandalism, as you did here, here, and here. The user seemed be trying to improve the page, and userpages are allowed to be edited by anybody. Thank you for your time. Ch u ck (contrib) 07:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
I found it confusing that PYT directed to the band rather than the song, which I was looking for. therefore, i thought that a disambiguation page was the answer. the page "PYT (band)" should not be deleted as it is the new page for the band. thanks. -- Paaerduag 07:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Just an opinion, but isn't the song by Michael Jackson more famous than the band. I mean, i've never heard of the band, but the song is incredibly famous (on the thriller album), and it is the inspiration for the band. I belive that the song should be the first article that appears, and there should be a link to the band. sound alright? -- Paaerduag 07:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Wait, i don't think you understand. I'll show you. just one moment...-- Paaerduag 07:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
There, i'm finished, and as long as PYT (band) is deleted, it'll be alright. the correct way to write the title is "P.Y.T. (band)" anyway, because each letter stands for a different word, as with the song. thanks. -- Paaerduag 07:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
My compliments on the grace with which you handled the recent (most likely clueless) vandalism of Vegetable oils. Well done! Waitak 11:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there. I see you just put the page WikiProject Arthropods up for speedy deletion. It used to redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Arthropods. I don't understand why this page should be deleted; if someone does a search for "WikiProject Arthropods" (it doesn't come to every user's mind that a WikiProject is in Wikipedia space, not main space), they will be redirected to the WikiProject. Apparently this was also the idea of the editor who restored the content of the page after it was previously deleted (a process which I did not notice). Could you enlighten me on the reasons of this deletion? Thanks, Iron C hris | (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
You added a comment to a closed RFD ( Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion#Ckatz.2FWorkspace.2FTemplates .E2.86.92 User:Ckatz.2FWorkspace.2FTemplates) awhile back. Did you mean for that comment to actually be for the preceeding debate (about Shelving filter)? It seems to make more sense there. Thought I'd point it out just in case... -- JLaTondre 23:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I took the liberty to change the target of the cross-namespace redirect Wikipedian from Wikipedia:Wikipedian to Wikipedia. I just realized it has 3000+ incoming links, but none is from the article namespace. Could you please orphan it by changing Wikipedian wikilinks to Wikipedia:Wikipedian? -- Zoz (t) 11:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
You wrote:
"no delete arguments were refuted"???
Sigh. So, this is the end – too bad.
I just want you to know; just as the powers that be haven't changed their minds, neither have I. I still insist that this is a wrong decision. I branched the synopsis article from the main film article in an act of good faith. This was the work of many and not any single individual. This user thinks 2001: A Space Odyssey is the best science fiction film ever made; and a 196-word synopsis just does not do the film justice. -- Jason Palpatine 13:09, 15 June 2006 (UTC) speak your mind
Re [3], why both Categories, All orphaned fairuse images and Orphaned fairuse images? It would appear fully redundant. -- Gmaxwell 04:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Try out these links: User:General Eisenhower/Newpages and User:General Eisenhower/Recent Changes. General Eisenhower • ( at war or at peace) 15:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rory, I added the WPCD template to the hydrochloric acid talk page, thinking that by doing that I'd recommend it for the CD-publications. But you reverted the addition with the comment that the article isn't on the CD. Then, how would I recommend a certain article for the CD-publication? Please help? Wim van Dorst ( Talk) 19:04, 17 June 2006 (UTC).
Hey - I just saw an IP strike out your PUI nom so I reverted it, but when I went to leave a note about not striking out entries, I realized it appears to be you. If it was you, feel free to revert my edit. (But please sign in first :-)) - SCEhard T 21:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for voting! Hello Rory096/Archive12, and thank you so much for voting in my recent RfA. I am pleased to inform you that it passed with a final tally of (119/1/3), into the WP:100, so I have now been cleared for adminship and will soon be soaring above the clouds. I was overjoyed, shocked, and humbled by the tally, and, most importantly, all the support. Thank you. If there is ever anything you need, you know where you can find me. Take care. |
-- Pilot| guy 22:24, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 25 | 19 June 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Message delivered by Ralbot 23:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
Hello Rory096, and thanks for voting in my recent RfA, which passed with a tally of (68/19/3). I appreciated your comments, which I hope to take on board in order to gain your respect in my work as an administrator. Best of luck in your continued editing of the encyclopedia! Sam Vimes 17:37, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Rory, check the doctor who, tenth doctor page. I got blocked for no reason by that admin. No warning, no nothing.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.252.251.204 ( talk • contribs) .
Pay attention, sometimes people are talking about the redirects. Kotepho 07:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Excuse me if I'm wrong, but you're AFD nomination of Raasta makes it look like you consider 2 singles as a end-all requirement. Remember, there's more guidelines in WP:MUSIC, besides the 2-single suggestion. It helps if you touch upon a few of those other guidelines in your nominations too. - Mgm| (talk) 10:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi -- I haven't looked closely at the current reverting at the list of countries, but it seems to be more than simple vandalism, and as such you're going to run afoul of 3RR if you keep reverting it. (I've warned the IP anon as well about this.) Perhaps you could leave a note on the article's talk page about why you don't think the text added should be included? Many thanks. -- Fastfission 19:16, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Your block will expire in 15 minutes. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. AmiDaniel ( talk) 07:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC) |