Nearly Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Needs Improvement Note: Your sentences are too long and choppy. You need to break them up. Altough there is good fluency with your transitional phrases at times.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard Note: Lots of information, if you condensed it for your edit then its your sources contain a lot of good information.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Spelling/Grammar Exceeds standard
Language Meets standard, I would say it was clear and easy to understand
Organization Nearly meets standard, I think you should add the header on the top of the paragraph
Coding Meets standards
Validity Exceeds standards,
Completion Nearly meets standards,because you mention some composers and musicians, I think that you should add some music works at that time.
Relevance Exceeds standards
Sources Exceeds standards
Citations Exceeds standards
References Meets standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiayue zhang ( talk • contribs) 05:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Spelling/Grammar Meets Expectations
Language Meets Expectations Good encyclopedic tone and diction
Organization Does not meet standard. There are a long paragraph and no headers.
Coding Meet standard. few coding errors.
Validity nearly meet standard.
Completion Does not meet standard. this paragraph seems like a summary paragraph, and miss some specific and detail information for the Economy of Dulin.
Relevance nearly meets standard. Some irrelevant content. For example, there are much more information about the population growth and aged tendency of the population.
Sources Nearly meets standard.
Citations Meets Expectations
References Does not meet standard. The references formatting is not correct, and some reference you only leave the URL.
Nearly Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Needs Improvement Note: Your sentences are too long and choppy. You need to break them up. Altough there is good fluency with your transitional phrases at times.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard Note: Lots of information, if you condensed it for your edit then its your sources contain a lot of good information.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Spelling/Grammar Exceeds standard
Language Meets standard, I would say it was clear and easy to understand
Organization Nearly meets standard, I think you should add the header on the top of the paragraph
Coding Meets standards
Validity Exceeds standards,
Completion Nearly meets standards,because you mention some composers and musicians, I think that you should add some music works at that time.
Relevance Exceeds standards
Sources Exceeds standards
Citations Exceeds standards
References Meets standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jiayue zhang ( talk • contribs) 05:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Spelling/Grammar Meets Expectations
Language Meets Expectations Good encyclopedic tone and diction
Organization Does not meet standard. There are a long paragraph and no headers.
Coding Meet standard. few coding errors.
Validity nearly meet standard.
Completion Does not meet standard. this paragraph seems like a summary paragraph, and miss some specific and detail information for the Economy of Dulin.
Relevance nearly meets standard. Some irrelevant content. For example, there are much more information about the population growth and aged tendency of the population.
Sources Nearly meets standard.
Citations Meets Expectations
References Does not meet standard. The references formatting is not correct, and some reference you only leave the URL.