|
I think I'm ready to start the next art critic bio now that the Brian Sherwin bio is out of the way. The Edward Winleman bio will be my next contribution. Tyler's will be a breeze. I think. If anyone reads this and has ideas let me know. Let me know if you are aware of other American art critics and writers that you think should be included on wikipedia. I'll read up on them. ( Roodhouse1 ( talk) 17:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC))
If you can find the sources, by all means write up the article. You can do this in your user space at User:Roodhouse1/Kirk Weddle (click link to start the new page). It was such a short article that I suggest starting from scratch. If you really need the existing text, I can retrieve it. Ty 00:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
If there are multiple secondary sources that treat the subject, then as far as wiki is concerned someone/thing is notable. Trivial mentions (e.g. one-liners) do not provide validation. Ty 02:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Zevitas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Zevitas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 23:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
|
I think I'm ready to start the next art critic bio now that the Brian Sherwin bio is out of the way. The Edward Winleman bio will be my next contribution. Tyler's will be a breeze. I think. If anyone reads this and has ideas let me know. Let me know if you are aware of other American art critics and writers that you think should be included on wikipedia. I'll read up on them. ( Roodhouse1 ( talk) 17:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC))
If you can find the sources, by all means write up the article. You can do this in your user space at User:Roodhouse1/Kirk Weddle (click link to start the new page). It was such a short article that I suggest starting from scratch. If you really need the existing text, I can retrieve it. Ty 00:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
If there are multiple secondary sources that treat the subject, then as far as wiki is concerned someone/thing is notable. Trivial mentions (e.g. one-liners) do not provide validation. Ty 02:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Zevitas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Zevitas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend ( talk) 23:07, 7 August 2020 (UTC)