{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Nick-D (
talk)
05:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)I'm WP:INVOLVED given that I've been involved in reverting your previous BLP violations and have worked on various of your other edits, and this block is made per the provisions for involved admins set out at WP:BLPREMOVE. You may, of course, appeal it using the process above if you would like another admin to review the block.
I have implemented this block as you are persistently violating WP:BLP under each of your successive accounts ( Sam56mas ( talk · contribs) (which I suspect is you; the following accounts are definitely the same person), BruceSpider ( talk · contribs), Karpes ( talk · contribs), Karpes ( talk · contribs) Rofseb ( talk · contribs) and some IP editing such as 1.152.96.65 ( talk · contribs)), despite warnings about this and reversions by other editors.
Rofseb ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not asking for an unblock. For every point raised above, there is a very strong WP:PG rebuttal. Rather, I offer some wider observations.
1 the editing to which the Complainant-Administrator refers. I am aware of strong and divergent POVs related to the subject-matter, as well as personal risks.
2 the Complainant-Administrator's own editing of Wikipedia's Islam in Australia. With [12] being his only addition, over the last five months, which is a dubious contribution both in its veracity and in that it is underpinned by a tenuous reference to Hizb ut-Tahrir in Uzbekistan. [13]
I am not asking for an unblock. Rofseb ( talk) 20:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unblock not requested.-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 20:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Nick-D (
talk)
05:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)I'm WP:INVOLVED given that I've been involved in reverting your previous BLP violations and have worked on various of your other edits, and this block is made per the provisions for involved admins set out at WP:BLPREMOVE. You may, of course, appeal it using the process above if you would like another admin to review the block.
I have implemented this block as you are persistently violating WP:BLP under each of your successive accounts ( Sam56mas ( talk · contribs) (which I suspect is you; the following accounts are definitely the same person), BruceSpider ( talk · contribs), Karpes ( talk · contribs), Karpes ( talk · contribs) Rofseb ( talk · contribs) and some IP editing such as 1.152.96.65 ( talk · contribs)), despite warnings about this and reversions by other editors.
Rofseb ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not asking for an unblock. For every point raised above, there is a very strong WP:PG rebuttal. Rather, I offer some wider observations.
1 the editing to which the Complainant-Administrator refers. I am aware of strong and divergent POVs related to the subject-matter, as well as personal risks.
2 the Complainant-Administrator's own editing of Wikipedia's Islam in Australia. With [12] being his only addition, over the last five months, which is a dubious contribution both in its veracity and in that it is underpinned by a tenuous reference to Hizb ut-Tahrir in Uzbekistan. [13]
I am not asking for an unblock. Rofseb ( talk) 20:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unblock not requested.-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 20:50, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.