The problem is that Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view and that editors not have a conflict of interest. Information added needs to be presented neutrally and, just as importantly, it needs to be verifiable by citing reliable third-party sources. Primary sources are those directly linked with the subject of the article and should not be used.
I think it's great that you want to contribute, but material that doesn't meet the encyclopedia's guidelines that I link to in the preceding paragraph can be removed at any time. Cheers, Doonhamer ( talk) 07:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
The problem is that Wikipedia requires a neutral point of view and that editors not have a conflict of interest. Information added needs to be presented neutrally and, just as importantly, it needs to be verifiable by citing reliable third-party sources. Primary sources are those directly linked with the subject of the article and should not be used.
I think it's great that you want to contribute, but material that doesn't meet the encyclopedia's guidelines that I link to in the preceding paragraph can be removed at any time. Cheers, Doonhamer ( talk) 07:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)