Welcome!
Hello, Riversidepr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
Db099221
00:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
That was a nice thing to add (I have met him too) but it's POV (as we say here) and not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. I pared it down to what's relevant. (Perhaps you could consider starting an article on the Legislative Gazette? It is certainly notable enough to be included here?) Daniel Case 03:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I had to revert to the version previous to your edits on the Peter T. King page. Personally, I agree with you, but we can't put stuff like that the section dedicated to his biography. Perhaps adding what you have to contribute to the "Controversy" section or converting "Controversy" to "Controversy and Criticism", or something like that? Fifty7 20:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Annaveleva.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Is this account a role account for Riverside Public Relations? Such an account is disallowed; accounts are supposed to be restricted to individuals and company-promotional accounts are not allowed either. Leebo T/ C 18:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
John McCain appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our
core policies. Thank you.
Anastrophe
21:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Riversidepr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
Db099221
00:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
That was a nice thing to add (I have met him too) but it's POV (as we say here) and not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. I pared it down to what's relevant. (Perhaps you could consider starting an article on the Legislative Gazette? It is certainly notable enough to be included here?) Daniel Case 03:03, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
I had to revert to the version previous to your edits on the Peter T. King page. Personally, I agree with you, but we can't put stuff like that the section dedicated to his biography. Perhaps adding what you have to contribute to the "Controversy" section or converting "Controversy" to "Controversy and Criticism", or something like that? Fifty7 20:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Annaveleva.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
Is this account a role account for Riverside Public Relations? Such an account is disallowed; accounts are supposed to be restricted to individuals and company-promotional accounts are not allowed either. Leebo T/ C 18:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a
neutral point of view. A contribution you made to
John McCain appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our
core policies. Thank you.
Anastrophe
21:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)