Hi,
Thanks for some great work on this topic. I have taken the POV tag off, and restored just a little of the stuff you removed, but I think the article is so much better now. Regards Springnuts 19:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Becasue you deserve it for picking up a hot potato Springnuts 19:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
You restored material from a self-published web site, in violation of WP policy, with no policy justification on the talk page. Please follow WP policy. I reverted the material. Leadwind ( talk) 15:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not keep taking it upon yourself to move around Purgatory. There is a AFD discussion ongoing as to whether the current structure should be kept or whether it should be deleted. If you scramble the content, the people who are trying to evaluate the situation will be unable to examine what was done.
Maybe Abtract's change was a good one, maybe it was a bad one, almost certainly it was a bold one. But doing the same change, backwards, with an AFD discussion ongoing, accomplishes nothing but disruption. Remember there is no deadline, let the discussion play out, and if AFD decides to delete-merge the RC article back into main, it will require the assistants of an admin to get the histories right.
Even if you feel Abtract's change was an error, you don't have the power to correct this error, you can only exacerbate it. Please don't. -- Alecmconroy ( talk) 22:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I have moved Userpage2 to User:Ritterschaft/Userpage2. -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 08:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Ritterschaft, I'm distressed about what's going on with purgatory. You don't seem happy yourself. What's going on? I've lost track. Leadwind ( talk) 01:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
You may not look at this page frequently. I think it useful therefore to let you know, ahead of any action by Lw, of his declared intention to "get back into purgatory" (see User_talk:Alecmconroy&diff=prev&oldid=194663290 here). You may prefer to remove this, after reading it. There is no need to do anything about Lw's planned RfC (jargon for something like "Referral for Comment" - I haven't gone to the trouble of finding out what exactly it is) on me: it will provide the usual amusement that he keeps giving. Lima ( talk) 15:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
Thanks for some great work on this topic. I have taken the POV tag off, and restored just a little of the stuff you removed, but I think the article is so much better now. Regards Springnuts 19:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Becasue you deserve it for picking up a hot potato Springnuts 19:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC) |
You restored material from a self-published web site, in violation of WP policy, with no policy justification on the talk page. Please follow WP policy. I reverted the material. Leadwind ( talk) 15:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Please do not keep taking it upon yourself to move around Purgatory. There is a AFD discussion ongoing as to whether the current structure should be kept or whether it should be deleted. If you scramble the content, the people who are trying to evaluate the situation will be unable to examine what was done.
Maybe Abtract's change was a good one, maybe it was a bad one, almost certainly it was a bold one. But doing the same change, backwards, with an AFD discussion ongoing, accomplishes nothing but disruption. Remember there is no deadline, let the discussion play out, and if AFD decides to delete-merge the RC article back into main, it will require the assistants of an admin to get the histories right.
Even if you feel Abtract's change was an error, you don't have the power to correct this error, you can only exacerbate it. Please don't. -- Alecmconroy ( talk) 22:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
I have moved Userpage2 to User:Ritterschaft/Userpage2. -- RHaworth ( Talk | contribs) 08:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Ritterschaft, I'm distressed about what's going on with purgatory. You don't seem happy yourself. What's going on? I've lost track. Leadwind ( talk) 01:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
You may not look at this page frequently. I think it useful therefore to let you know, ahead of any action by Lw, of his declared intention to "get back into purgatory" (see User_talk:Alecmconroy&diff=prev&oldid=194663290 here). You may prefer to remove this, after reading it. There is no need to do anything about Lw's planned RfC (jargon for something like "Referral for Comment" - I haven't gone to the trouble of finding out what exactly it is) on me: it will provide the usual amusement that he keeps giving. Lima ( talk) 15:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)