This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | Archive 79 | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | → | Archive 85 |
Dont want any problems on restoring notorious Conejo's page. Well known rapper from Southern California with articles/citations in two languages from several news outlets. Nyc media research ( talk) 07:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC) NYC media Research
What's the problem in this articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.130.2.220 ( talk) 20:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Carpenters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan ( talk) 21:00, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Ritchie333, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
flowers, music, balloon |
... Thank you for today's DYK lead image (under debate, sigh). - It's my parents' wedding anniversary, and the bridal flowers were gladiolas from her parents' garden. I share them in loving memory, with a touch of art. The link is shameless canvassing - to the same image ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:50, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
...on Geraint's Tour win. I assume you cheer for the Welsh? :) Drmies ( talk) 17:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Enterprisey ( talk!) 05:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I see you have blocked 73.32.84.138 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) due to mass unsourced changes to music articles. Believe I've dealt with this character before as well. It appears they're now using 96.64.51.114 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log); note the same edits to to Kiss songs, and both geolocate to Comcast in Houston. Home Lander ( talk) 18:35, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Having followed the
AfD for File:Trump_Baby_Balloon_at_Parliament_Square.jpeg, then comes the natural technical question
: How can images, hosted on non-WMF platforms, be embedded in WP-articles?
I've read
Help:Visual_file_markup which suggest that it can not be done, but is that really true?
Also, I don't understand why your photo got so much flak, when seeing articles like e.g.
Ron Mueck
- Am I missing something (other than naively to suspect trumpanzees at play) ?
BTW/FYI: Google's Picasa is long gone. Google's "replacement" is Google Photos. (Note: I've never used the Picasa app/client, I only ever used Picasa Web Albums.).
--
DexterPointy (
talk)
13:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
This kindof thing bugs the living crap out of me when I visit a metropolitan area and I'm trying to spot things that would be educationally useful images, but wouldn't violate some esoteric copyright law. It's stupid to the level that only Parliament or Congress could manage to come up with it in the first place. Heaven help us if they ever get together. GMG talk 01:58, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
But it does no one any good to go 200% Fox News on the issue, about how Obamacare will euthanize our elderly, because you understand neither euthanasia nor the Affordable Care Act.Not the most ridiculous analogy I've ever read but definitely a contender. I don't think anybody here is actually as foolish as you seem to be implying. Please, just take what we're saying on the chin like an adult and don't react like you've had your ego bruised. You were the one who pointed out the stupidity of the law which you purport to be applying, so it's probably not a good idea to retaliate by calling other people stupid.
The Original Barnstar | ||
Dude, you're just rad and such a necessary asset to the WP project. Thank you for swooping in and saving me on some major article milestones. It's very much appreciated! — Miss Sarita 09:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC) |
The article The Carpenters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Carpenters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan ( talk) 01:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Anyway, on a more serious note, DYK hooks anyone? I'm struggling to find anything that's not a) boring or b) rather sad. The best I can think of so far is being fired from a residency gig for being "too radical", but that pre-dates the Carpenters by a few years. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
I have a query for this entry. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 22:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Regarding humorous style, you wrote:
I think you've got the wrong end of the stick. While "tightening phrasing" on a general article is a good idea (because it allows the reader to understand the topic faster), that doesn't really apply to humorous essays, where being more verbose can be funnier.... I seem to recall reading once that one easy way to be funny is to be specific and verbose when you don't need to.
I think the key tool of humor, both written and spoken, is timing. The audience has to "get" the surprise of the punchline at exactly the right moment, neither too soon nor too late, and an extra word can be as dulling as a missing word.
This obviously depends on the audience, and someone who has read the text over and over will have a hard time judging the reaction of a new reader. I didn't think the punchlines in the intro were worth the labored windups, and I tried to make them more in the style of throwaway lines.
I think we can agree Wikipedians are about as funny as computer code. (That some of us find computer code funny just proves my point.) The real question is, can we be funnier collectively? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magyar25 ( talk • contribs)
_ Cheers, Mr rnddude ( talk) 06:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Appearing at Cardiff tomorrow..... Welsh folk super-group Pendevid!! ... who remind me a bit of one early version of The Albion Band, or maybe Malicorne, and perhaps even a few prog-rock outfits before and since then. Just for you, here's a fully copyright-compliant "Lliw Gwyn". At least Calan have a Wikipedia article, even though Gwilym Bowen Rhys, Iestyn Tyne, Jordan Price Williams, Aneurin Jones, Jamie Smith, Iolo Wheelan, Greg Sterland, Jake Durham, Ted Smith and Aeddan Llywelyn do not, yet, alas. Well, enjoy the video anyway.... me ol' Welsh china. Martinevans123 ( talk) 21:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
When you suggested they run for adminship, I'm guessing you also didn't know MBL was coming off an indefinite block for sockpuppetry, right? [2]. Vanamonde ( talk) 05:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
if frivolous talk page editing continues.
being an *#$@%^ for the sake of it) and I've found many folks (I'm not taking any names......) to be quite civil, contrary to the reputation they carry-about in the wiki-sphere. But, yeah being less blunt and snarky would certainly help:-)
As for civility, several times recently I have compared the excellent atmosphere at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red to other parts of the site, and wondered why every conversation I have seen with editors like Rosiestep and SusunW has been civil, polite and productive (both with my own discussions, and those from other parties) and a model level of conduct that I would like to see everywhere, and yet I seem to be incapable of having a conversation with some editors without tearing my hair out, thinking "why the **** can't you understand what I'm getting at?" I would love the whole of Wikipedia to have the same level of civility as WiR where everyone treats everyone else respectfully, but it just doesn't happen. It does match what I see in the real world, where some people (and it generally tends to be women, but not exclusively) are just able to communicate better without the other party getting annoyed, fed up or cross, whereas if I said exactly the same words it wouldn't happen. I'd love to figure out why this is, because it makes my head hurt trying to understand why. :-/ Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, back in 2013 I had requested that my account deleted/name scrambled however it's still searchable and I would like to have that amended please along with any other other instances, thanks. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2013_October_15
The username with Uttaranchal University. For web crawler avoidance reasons I am not writing the username here.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.230.198.72 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, allow me to clarify, I am not asking for the account to be removed, that's already scrambled so that's good enough, I'm asking for the text of the name from the title to be removed User:S___\Uttaranchal University on that page or at least changed to be the same as the scrambled name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.230.198.72 ( talk • contribs)
Hi Ritchie333. I found you listed as a GA mentor at WP:GAHELP, and am wondering if you'd mind taking a look at Talk:Despacito/GA2 when you have a spare moment or two. I'm not really familiar with the GA review process and did not review the article myself, but I only came accross it as explained in User talk:Fhsig13#Despacito. Tbhotch's comment about needing a WP:GAR at the end of that discussion thread in particular makes me wonder whether a review of this GA review might be needed. Since you seem to have lots of experience doing GA reviews of music related articles, I though you'd be a good person to ask for additional feedback. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
The Women in Red barnstar | |
This barnstar is awarded to Ritchie333 for repeatedly supporting the Women in Red wikiproject, in particular by helping to resolve issues with our members. Your assistance is warmly appreciated.-- Ipigott ( talk) 14:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks, Ian. I have to be honest and say I wish the camaraderie and good collaborative spirit in WiR would spill into topics that I am more of an expert at writing (eg: classic 60s/ 70s rock, railway stations, musical instruments, British upper class oddballs), but hopefully if the WiR ethos of working spreads, it may happen yet. Actually, I shouldn't be so cynical, there are some editors like FunkMonk and Rodw who do great work without going near WiR-related topics, but since they never have cause to appear on the WP:Dramaboard, you won't have heard of them unless you've done a GA / FA review with them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ritchie333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " WEEE Forum".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 22:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
{{
subst:submit}}
, and then became the submitter, but should have added {{
subst:submit|MagdaChary}}. We really need a little script for this if we do not already have it. I find myself manually typing {{
subst:submit|whoever started the draft}} on a daily basis.
Sam
Sailor
22:34, 11 August 2018 (UTC)It's great how you've craftily found this pre-'77 image, unmarked by A&M, promotion from a November 1973 Billboard magazine. I'm sure you're aware of the distortion/marks throughout the image - in that same book/magazine, the same image [cropped slightly], can be found on page 20 without quality issues and in higher resolution [ cropped and brightened myself if you're interested]. I wonder if you can replace the file [and link to immediate source [ link]] with this otherwise identical image from page 20? This is only to make this near-perfect thread closer to perfection! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 'Seán754 ( talk • contribs)
My point was that using the same Billboard magazine, and file name/template, on page 20 there is a high quality, improved version of this image already. [I cropped it out of the page as you would do, which I linked above]. The file could simply be replaced with a png of the image on page 20 of that very same Billboard magazine in place of the [current] lower-quality image from page 24, and only the page reference/link to the 'immediate source' would need changing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 'Seán754 ( talk • contribs)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Houses of the Holy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk ( talk) 23:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your help Ritchie333, I appear to be able to edit now. Have a great day. A.kenney ( talk) 13:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
At the moment, I want to add to the pages of Sean Fine and Andrea Nix Fine with info from interviews they have given. I think I can figure it out, but any advice would be much appreciated. A.kenney ( talk) 13:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 75 | ← | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | Archive 79 | Archive 80 | Archive 81 | → | Archive 85 |
Dont want any problems on restoring notorious Conejo's page. Well known rapper from Southern California with articles/citations in two languages from several news outlets. Nyc media research ( talk) 07:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC) NYC media Research
What's the problem in this articles? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.130.2.220 ( talk) 20:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Carpenters you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan ( talk) 21:00, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello Ritchie333, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ( or here) 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
flowers, music, balloon |
... Thank you for today's DYK lead image (under debate, sigh). - It's my parents' wedding anniversary, and the bridal flowers were gladiolas from her parents' garden. I share them in loving memory, with a touch of art. The link is shameless canvassing - to the same image ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 12:50, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
...on Geraint's Tour win. I assume you cheer for the Welsh? :) Drmies ( talk) 17:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Enterprisey ( talk!) 05:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
I see you have blocked 73.32.84.138 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) due to mass unsourced changes to music articles. Believe I've dealt with this character before as well. It appears they're now using 96.64.51.114 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log); note the same edits to to Kiss songs, and both geolocate to Comcast in Houston. Home Lander ( talk) 18:35, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Having followed the
AfD for File:Trump_Baby_Balloon_at_Parliament_Square.jpeg, then comes the natural technical question
: How can images, hosted on non-WMF platforms, be embedded in WP-articles?
I've read
Help:Visual_file_markup which suggest that it can not be done, but is that really true?
Also, I don't understand why your photo got so much flak, when seeing articles like e.g.
Ron Mueck
- Am I missing something (other than naively to suspect trumpanzees at play) ?
BTW/FYI: Google's Picasa is long gone. Google's "replacement" is Google Photos. (Note: I've never used the Picasa app/client, I only ever used Picasa Web Albums.).
--
DexterPointy (
talk)
13:17, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
This kindof thing bugs the living crap out of me when I visit a metropolitan area and I'm trying to spot things that would be educationally useful images, but wouldn't violate some esoteric copyright law. It's stupid to the level that only Parliament or Congress could manage to come up with it in the first place. Heaven help us if they ever get together. GMG talk 01:58, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
But it does no one any good to go 200% Fox News on the issue, about how Obamacare will euthanize our elderly, because you understand neither euthanasia nor the Affordable Care Act.Not the most ridiculous analogy I've ever read but definitely a contender. I don't think anybody here is actually as foolish as you seem to be implying. Please, just take what we're saying on the chin like an adult and don't react like you've had your ego bruised. You were the one who pointed out the stupidity of the law which you purport to be applying, so it's probably not a good idea to retaliate by calling other people stupid.
The Original Barnstar | ||
Dude, you're just rad and such a necessary asset to the WP project. Thank you for swooping in and saving me on some major article milestones. It's very much appreciated! — Miss Sarita 09:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC) |
The article The Carpenters you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Carpenters for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan ( talk) 01:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Anyway, on a more serious note, DYK hooks anyone? I'm struggling to find anything that's not a) boring or b) rather sad. The best I can think of so far is being fired from a residency gig for being "too radical", but that pre-dates the Carpenters by a few years. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
I have a query for this entry. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 22:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Regarding humorous style, you wrote:
I think you've got the wrong end of the stick. While "tightening phrasing" on a general article is a good idea (because it allows the reader to understand the topic faster), that doesn't really apply to humorous essays, where being more verbose can be funnier.... I seem to recall reading once that one easy way to be funny is to be specific and verbose when you don't need to.
I think the key tool of humor, both written and spoken, is timing. The audience has to "get" the surprise of the punchline at exactly the right moment, neither too soon nor too late, and an extra word can be as dulling as a missing word.
This obviously depends on the audience, and someone who has read the text over and over will have a hard time judging the reaction of a new reader. I didn't think the punchlines in the intro were worth the labored windups, and I tried to make them more in the style of throwaway lines.
I think we can agree Wikipedians are about as funny as computer code. (That some of us find computer code funny just proves my point.) The real question is, can we be funnier collectively? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magyar25 ( talk • contribs)
_ Cheers, Mr rnddude ( talk) 06:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Appearing at Cardiff tomorrow..... Welsh folk super-group Pendevid!! ... who remind me a bit of one early version of The Albion Band, or maybe Malicorne, and perhaps even a few prog-rock outfits before and since then. Just for you, here's a fully copyright-compliant "Lliw Gwyn". At least Calan have a Wikipedia article, even though Gwilym Bowen Rhys, Iestyn Tyne, Jordan Price Williams, Aneurin Jones, Jamie Smith, Iolo Wheelan, Greg Sterland, Jake Durham, Ted Smith and Aeddan Llywelyn do not, yet, alas. Well, enjoy the video anyway.... me ol' Welsh china. Martinevans123 ( talk) 21:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
When you suggested they run for adminship, I'm guessing you also didn't know MBL was coming off an indefinite block for sockpuppetry, right? [2]. Vanamonde ( talk) 05:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
if frivolous talk page editing continues.
being an *#$@%^ for the sake of it) and I've found many folks (I'm not taking any names......) to be quite civil, contrary to the reputation they carry-about in the wiki-sphere. But, yeah being less blunt and snarky would certainly help:-)
As for civility, several times recently I have compared the excellent atmosphere at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red to other parts of the site, and wondered why every conversation I have seen with editors like Rosiestep and SusunW has been civil, polite and productive (both with my own discussions, and those from other parties) and a model level of conduct that I would like to see everywhere, and yet I seem to be incapable of having a conversation with some editors without tearing my hair out, thinking "why the **** can't you understand what I'm getting at?" I would love the whole of Wikipedia to have the same level of civility as WiR where everyone treats everyone else respectfully, but it just doesn't happen. It does match what I see in the real world, where some people (and it generally tends to be women, but not exclusively) are just able to communicate better without the other party getting annoyed, fed up or cross, whereas if I said exactly the same words it wouldn't happen. I'd love to figure out why this is, because it makes my head hurt trying to understand why. :-/ Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, back in 2013 I had requested that my account deleted/name scrambled however it's still searchable and I would like to have that amended please along with any other other instances, thanks. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2013_October_15
The username with Uttaranchal University. For web crawler avoidance reasons I am not writing the username here.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.230.198.72 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, allow me to clarify, I am not asking for the account to be removed, that's already scrambled so that's good enough, I'm asking for the text of the name from the title to be removed User:S___\Uttaranchal University on that page or at least changed to be the same as the scrambled name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.230.198.72 ( talk • contribs)
Hi Ritchie333. I found you listed as a GA mentor at WP:GAHELP, and am wondering if you'd mind taking a look at Talk:Despacito/GA2 when you have a spare moment or two. I'm not really familiar with the GA review process and did not review the article myself, but I only came accross it as explained in User talk:Fhsig13#Despacito. Tbhotch's comment about needing a WP:GAR at the end of that discussion thread in particular makes me wonder whether a review of this GA review might be needed. Since you seem to have lots of experience doing GA reviews of music related articles, I though you'd be a good person to ask for additional feedback. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:30, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
The Women in Red barnstar | |
This barnstar is awarded to Ritchie333 for repeatedly supporting the Women in Red wikiproject, in particular by helping to resolve issues with our members. Your assistance is warmly appreciated.-- Ipigott ( talk) 14:57, 13 August 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks, Ian. I have to be honest and say I wish the camaraderie and good collaborative spirit in WiR would spill into topics that I am more of an expert at writing (eg: classic 60s/ 70s rock, railway stations, musical instruments, British upper class oddballs), but hopefully if the WiR ethos of working spreads, it may happen yet. Actually, I shouldn't be so cynical, there are some editors like FunkMonk and Rodw who do great work without going near WiR-related topics, but since they never have cause to appear on the WP:Dramaboard, you won't have heard of them unless you've done a GA / FA review with them. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ritchie333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " WEEE Forum".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 22:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
{{
subst:submit}}
, and then became the submitter, but should have added {{
subst:submit|MagdaChary}}. We really need a little script for this if we do not already have it. I find myself manually typing {{
subst:submit|whoever started the draft}} on a daily basis.
Sam
Sailor
22:34, 11 August 2018 (UTC)It's great how you've craftily found this pre-'77 image, unmarked by A&M, promotion from a November 1973 Billboard magazine. I'm sure you're aware of the distortion/marks throughout the image - in that same book/magazine, the same image [cropped slightly], can be found on page 20 without quality issues and in higher resolution [ cropped and brightened myself if you're interested]. I wonder if you can replace the file [and link to immediate source [ link]] with this otherwise identical image from page 20? This is only to make this near-perfect thread closer to perfection! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 'Seán754 ( talk • contribs)
My point was that using the same Billboard magazine, and file name/template, on page 20 there is a high quality, improved version of this image already. [I cropped it out of the page as you would do, which I linked above]. The file could simply be replaced with a png of the image on page 20 of that very same Billboard magazine in place of the [current] lower-quality image from page 24, and only the page reference/link to the 'immediate source' would need changing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 'Seán754 ( talk • contribs)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Houses of the Holy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk ( talk) 23:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your help Ritchie333, I appear to be able to edit now. Have a great day. A.kenney ( talk) 13:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
At the moment, I want to add to the pages of Sean Fine and Andrea Nix Fine with info from interviews they have given. I think I can figure it out, but any advice would be much appreciated. A.kenney ( talk) 13:22, 15 August 2018 (UTC)