This is Rim sim's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Welcome to Wikipedia!
|
|
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Rim sim,
Thank you for creating Einstein–Oppenheimer relationship.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
While I see there have been a couple of fact-checking articles in the wake of the Oppenheimer movie, overall it's hard for me to feel that "these two people never worked together" is a relationship that merits an article. Perhaps there's more to it?
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
— Moriwen ( talk) 16:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein–Oppenheimer relationship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Ldm1954 ( talk) 07:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Einstein–Oppenheimer relationship. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a stub which should be improved first before being submitted. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 ( talk) 22:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pornography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello Rim sim! Your additions to
Pornography have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added
copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent
copyright and
plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
This is Rim sim's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Welcome to Wikipedia!
|
|
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
( t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Rim sim,
Thank you for creating Einstein–Oppenheimer relationship.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
While I see there have been a couple of fact-checking articles in the wake of the Oppenheimer movie, overall it's hard for me to feel that "these two people never worked together" is a relationship that merits an article. Perhaps there's more to it?
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Moriwen}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
— Moriwen ( talk) 16:42, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Einstein–Oppenheimer relationship until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Ldm1954 ( talk) 07:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Einstein–Oppenheimer relationship. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is a stub which should be improved first before being submitted. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ldm1954 ( talk) 22:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pornography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello Rim sim! Your additions to
Pornography have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added
copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the
public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a
suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent
copyright and
plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 20:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)