You should read some of the things hoary has said about what I have composed on WP He has some more audicity and should not be an administrator on here He is brusk and lacks manners when it comes to understanding the idea of nuance which is what is needed when one deals with anything about artists or their work. I find him reprehensible. After his initial atack and my comments back to him, would you believe he actually went into my backlogs and started gleaning everything that he possibly could to demean any articles that I have worked on. He is a certain type of administrator that should be de-listed. In my opinion he has no cares as to how he edits, at least he things deletions are edits, Anyone can delete and not deal with the consequences of hanging articles. When another person sees the hanging articles they want to delete because his edits have caused them to ask this question. Hoary is like a bull in the china shoppe. Artsojourner 18:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello from your nemesis! I've just created an article on Karel Cudlín. It's not much good, but it does seem to be better than what's at cs:WP. Do please improve it if you can. -- Hoary 12:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Though I agree that AIT deserves the controversial label due to the media hoopla that surrounded it and Gore's methodology, it has been concluded that TGGWS deserves the label because of distorted data in its graphs. ~ S0CO( talk| contribs) 16:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 09:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
You should read some of the things hoary has said about what I have composed on WP He has some more audicity and should not be an administrator on here He is brusk and lacks manners when it comes to understanding the idea of nuance which is what is needed when one deals with anything about artists or their work. I find him reprehensible. After his initial atack and my comments back to him, would you believe he actually went into my backlogs and started gleaning everything that he possibly could to demean any articles that I have worked on. He is a certain type of administrator that should be de-listed. In my opinion he has no cares as to how he edits, at least he things deletions are edits, Anyone can delete and not deal with the consequences of hanging articles. When another person sees the hanging articles they want to delete because his edits have caused them to ask this question. Hoary is like a bull in the china shoppe. Artsojourner 18:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello from your nemesis! I've just created an article on Karel Cudlín. It's not much good, but it does seem to be better than what's at cs:WP. Do please improve it if you can. -- Hoary 12:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Though I agree that AIT deserves the controversial label due to the media hoopla that surrounded it and Gore's methodology, it has been concluded that TGGWS deserves the label because of distorted data in its graphs. ~ S0CO( talk| contribs) 16:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 09:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)