![]() |
Hi Rhythdybiau! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC) |
That was a bit rude to delete my article and hide the notification in a talk page archive so that I did not get notified about it until it had already happened! I would have objected, mainly on the grounds that these pharmacological tool compounds have continuing use in research, this compound continues to be sold and is likely to appear in future publications even if it hasn't recently, it would have been possible to find additional references and flesh the article out more, etc. Bit late now, and in this particular case the compound is not especially notable, but as a general rule these obscure compounds tend to reappear and grow in notability over time. I can see you have only been editing here for a few months and perhaps haven't seen how the significance of topics can change and grow with time. Meodipt ( talk) 09:38, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Megaman en m. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Satanic panic, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Megaman en m (
talk)
22:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Rochdale child sex abuse ring, you may be
blocked from editing.
Megaman en m (
talk)
10:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Rhythdybiau! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC) |
That was a bit rude to delete my article and hide the notification in a talk page archive so that I did not get notified about it until it had already happened! I would have objected, mainly on the grounds that these pharmacological tool compounds have continuing use in research, this compound continues to be sold and is likely to appear in future publications even if it hasn't recently, it would have been possible to find additional references and flesh the article out more, etc. Bit late now, and in this particular case the compound is not especially notable, but as a general rule these obscure compounds tend to reappear and grow in notability over time. I can see you have only been editing here for a few months and perhaps haven't seen how the significance of topics can change and grow with time. Meodipt ( talk) 09:38, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Megaman en m. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Satanic panic, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Megaman en m (
talk)
22:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Rochdale child sex abuse ring, you may be
blocked from editing.
Megaman en m (
talk)
10:06, 6 September 2021 (UTC)