Welcome!
Hey, Revrant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like the site and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful (some of them may sound stupid, but I recommend you check them out):
While editing, please remember:
You should introduce yourself here at the new user log. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name, the date, and the time.
For your first edits, I suggest searching for articles that you think might interest you. You could also be audacious and try a random page.
If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and happy editing!
Cbrown1023 22:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, reply on Indestructible's talk page. The point I just tried to make failed utterly, so I want to do it again, but I don't wanna double post, or edit my post. So just reply so I can try again. I'll even admit my last comment made me look stupid as hell. dude527 ( talk) 12:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
You were discussion me more than the actual content dispute, which is indeed a violation of WP:NPA, therefore the template was justified. I would recommend not removing it, because it does you no harm unless you continue anyways, and they expire after a little bit. But you've got to leave it on for any future editors who might want to tag you for anything (not assuming that you will do something wrong, but just in case), then those editors could see that you had one previous offense, and act accordingly. That's the whole point of those templates. I don't care if nothing was "intended," you still violated the guideline, and you gotta face "the template." -- The Guy complain edits 01:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
After reviewing your history on FfD, I just have to ask, have you ever voted to keep anything?
Also, have you ever come up with any other reasons than the ones you list which seem to deem everything regardless of it's importance to the subject matter as having no significance to the subject matter, even things covered by major media and thought of as cultural touchstones?
I just have a hard time seeing any logic in your blanket-statements, they really don't seem to do anything positive or constructive for the process of deletion, I wouldn't mind understanding the reasoning behind it, because as of now I'm at a complete loss. Revrant ( talk) 06:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Response, also in order.
Hey, I remember earlier this year during the FA nom for Indestructible by Disturbed, you said you had contacted publications to see if you could obtain any back issues. Any luck whatsoever? The Guy ( edits) 21:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to give you a warning. You're 1 edit away from violating the 3RR rule on Ten Thousand Fists.
The Guy ( edits) 23:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did to
World of Warcraft, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
- Sinneed (
talk) 07:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
... in an incident at wp:WQA - Sinneed ( talk) 00:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Revrant ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My phone's IP appears to be involved in a case of mistaken identity and I would like it unblocked, it is 2607:fb90:a0ab:1241:103:f640:37b8:469f
Decline reason:
That block is "anon only" [4]; -- registered users such as yourself should have no problems editing. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 21:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Revrant ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My phone's IP was blocked, I received a denial based on specious access to my account which I did not have on my phone, the case is mistaken identity or a block ban and should simply be repealed immediately, there is no tangible reason to deny the request.
Decline reason:
Your mobile IP range is blocked due to a large amount of abuse by someone else, but you should still be able to edit as noted above. Please note that the block is in no way a reflection on you or your account. — DoRD ( talk) 17:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
<How to elevate issue?> My phone's IP was involved in a case of mistaken identity, being the edits are from an entirely different geographical region, and unblock requests thus far have been flatly denied with no policy reason supplied. I need to elevate the issue to get it resolved and I'm not seeing where I move up to. I also need to know where to submit complaints regarding the unsubstantiated denials, thank you.
-- Revrant ( talk) 18:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Revrant ( talk) 18:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Talk:Wonder Woman (2017 film), but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you! SummerPhD
v2.0 13:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
(redacted)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. You have repeatedly re-added a controversial claim about a living person. The source you have provided says “I am sending my love and prayers to my fellow Israeli citizens,” she wrote. “Especially to all the boys and girls who are risking their lives protecting my country against the horrific acts conducted by Hamas, who are hiding like cowards behind women and children...We shall overcome!!! Shabbat Shalom! #weareright #freegazafromhamas #stopterror #coexistance #loveidf”
It does not say she supported the actions you have discussed. You have refused to take the discussion to the BLP noticeboard as repeatedly requested.
WP:BLP is a very rigid policy. If you restore the material again anywhere on Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD v2.0 00:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Stop the edit warring and any other form of disruptive editing. Sort out your differences with SummerPhDv2.0 civilly or at ANI. But if there is any more edit warring I will block both of you. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 02:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion can be found at
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Revrant_and_BLP_issue. SummerPhD
v2.0 02:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Revrant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Revrant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Shades 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 15:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hey, Revrant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like the site and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful (some of them may sound stupid, but I recommend you check them out):
While editing, please remember:
You should introduce yourself here at the new user log. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name, the date, and the time.
For your first edits, I suggest searching for articles that you think might interest you. You could also be audacious and try a random page.
If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and happy editing!
Cbrown1023 22:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey, reply on Indestructible's talk page. The point I just tried to make failed utterly, so I want to do it again, but I don't wanna double post, or edit my post. So just reply so I can try again. I'll even admit my last comment made me look stupid as hell. dude527 ( talk) 12:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
You were discussion me more than the actual content dispute, which is indeed a violation of WP:NPA, therefore the template was justified. I would recommend not removing it, because it does you no harm unless you continue anyways, and they expire after a little bit. But you've got to leave it on for any future editors who might want to tag you for anything (not assuming that you will do something wrong, but just in case), then those editors could see that you had one previous offense, and act accordingly. That's the whole point of those templates. I don't care if nothing was "intended," you still violated the guideline, and you gotta face "the template." -- The Guy complain edits 01:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
After reviewing your history on FfD, I just have to ask, have you ever voted to keep anything?
Also, have you ever come up with any other reasons than the ones you list which seem to deem everything regardless of it's importance to the subject matter as having no significance to the subject matter, even things covered by major media and thought of as cultural touchstones?
I just have a hard time seeing any logic in your blanket-statements, they really don't seem to do anything positive or constructive for the process of deletion, I wouldn't mind understanding the reasoning behind it, because as of now I'm at a complete loss. Revrant ( talk) 06:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Response, also in order.
Hey, I remember earlier this year during the FA nom for Indestructible by Disturbed, you said you had contacted publications to see if you could obtain any back issues. Any luck whatsoever? The Guy ( edits) 21:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, just wanted to give you a warning. You're 1 edit away from violating the 3RR rule on Ten Thousand Fists.
The Guy ( edits) 23:56, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did to
World of Warcraft, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
- Sinneed (
talk) 07:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
... in an incident at wp:WQA - Sinneed ( talk) 00:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Revrant ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My phone's IP appears to be involved in a case of mistaken identity and I would like it unblocked, it is 2607:fb90:a0ab:1241:103:f640:37b8:469f
Decline reason:
That block is "anon only" [4]; -- registered users such as yourself should have no problems editing. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 21:43, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Revrant ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
My phone's IP was blocked, I received a denial based on specious access to my account which I did not have on my phone, the case is mistaken identity or a block ban and should simply be repealed immediately, there is no tangible reason to deny the request.
Decline reason:
Your mobile IP range is blocked due to a large amount of abuse by someone else, but you should still be able to edit as noted above. Please note that the block is in no way a reflection on you or your account. — DoRD ( talk) 17:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
<How to elevate issue?> My phone's IP was involved in a case of mistaken identity, being the edits are from an entirely different geographical region, and unblock requests thus far have been flatly denied with no policy reason supplied. I need to elevate the issue to get it resolved and I'm not seeing where I move up to. I also need to know where to submit complaints regarding the unsubstantiated denials, thank you.
-- Revrant ( talk) 18:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Revrant ( talk) 18:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on
Talk:Wonder Woman (2017 film), but you didn't support your changes with a
citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning
how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you! SummerPhD
v2.0 13:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
(redacted)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
biographies of living persons policy by inserting
unsourced or
poorly sourced
defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. You have repeatedly re-added a controversial claim about a living person. The source you have provided says “I am sending my love and prayers to my fellow Israeli citizens,” she wrote. “Especially to all the boys and girls who are risking their lives protecting my country against the horrific acts conducted by Hamas, who are hiding like cowards behind women and children...We shall overcome!!! Shabbat Shalom! #weareright #freegazafromhamas #stopterror #coexistance #loveidf”
It does not say she supported the actions you have discussed. You have refused to take the discussion to the BLP noticeboard as repeatedly requested.
WP:BLP is a very rigid policy. If you restore the material again anywhere on Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD v2.0 00:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Stop the edit warring and any other form of disruptive editing. Sort out your differences with SummerPhDv2.0 civilly or at ANI. But if there is any more edit warring I will block both of you. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 02:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion can be found at
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Revrant_and_BLP_issue. SummerPhD
v2.0 02:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Revrant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Revrant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Shades 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused personal photo. Out of scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. --
Minorax«¦
talk¦» 15:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)