![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for creating Ellen James (author), Revolution1221!
Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I added a stub template and several categories.
To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.
Hallo, because I'm not a native english speaker: could you please explain "R2"? This REDIRECT was accidently created by me and so I thought it could be deleted. Could you be please so kindly and tell my what kind of "db" is correct? Many thanks in advance and sorry for my bad English (by the way, I would be happy, if you can show me my language mistakes, sure!). Kindly reg, -- Kettentaucher ( talk) 16:03, 25 March 2013 (UTC) EDIT: The same thing should be done with Andō Sakura. -- Kettentaucher ( talk) 16:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks a lot! Kettentaucher ( talk) 16:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC) |
What is your reasoning behind the edit reverts on the CFIA disambiguation page? You don't feel a need to respond to this? You revert everything I've done, and then simply use the reasoning "no explanation used". Huh? This is not true. I've explained my edits very clearly on the talk page. Please explain yourself. Petemustard ( talk) 22:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Ducknish ( talk) 22:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I orginally produced the page, I will be translating it into arabic with sources. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alipiero ( talk • contribs) 18:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
INeverCry 00:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You're supporting the inclusion of unsourced stuff into articles with this edit, which is against the verifiability policy. Just wanted to let you know that I've reverted it, along with the companion one, and also warned the IP user who added it (two times, so far). Moreover, it was agreed not to include Skytrax-related information into airline articles.-- Jetstreamer Talk 12:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
I see you've cleaned up one of my 1st articles - thanks for showing me the way Ajkinwales ( talk) 17:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
....I done now?! [1] ;-) Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 17:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
While certainly helpful in getting press coverage , it is not required under WP:NF that actors, writers, producers or directors be themselves independently notable or have their own articles. That's for the future. And while also helpful in gaining press coverage, WP:NF does not require that a film be a high-grossing studio blockbuster. What is a requirement under WP:NF is that a film receive coverage and analysis in independent sources. Evidence (film) has such coverage, as has been reflected in the article's expansion and improvement since you took it to AFD six minutes after it was created. More can be done, certainly, but we do well to not rush a brand new article into the ash heap. Is it one of the most notable films ever? No, not by a long shot. Does it have enough accepted genre coverage suitable for a low-budget independent film to merit inclusion within Wikipedia? I think yes. You are cordially invited back to the discussion. Best regards, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
I was just trying to see what had been done before the redirect and i didnt know how to go along doing it. im really sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topazmarauder ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
The article Sanco S.A. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Boleyn (
talk)
16:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for creating Ellen James (author), Revolution1221!
Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I added a stub template and several categories.
To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.
Hallo, because I'm not a native english speaker: could you please explain "R2"? This REDIRECT was accidently created by me and so I thought it could be deleted. Could you be please so kindly and tell my what kind of "db" is correct? Many thanks in advance and sorry for my bad English (by the way, I would be happy, if you can show me my language mistakes, sure!). Kindly reg, -- Kettentaucher ( talk) 16:03, 25 March 2013 (UTC) EDIT: The same thing should be done with Andō Sakura. -- Kettentaucher ( talk) 16:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thanks a lot! Kettentaucher ( talk) 16:26, 25 March 2013 (UTC) |
What is your reasoning behind the edit reverts on the CFIA disambiguation page? You don't feel a need to respond to this? You revert everything I've done, and then simply use the reasoning "no explanation used". Huh? This is not true. I've explained my edits very clearly on the talk page. Please explain yourself. Petemustard ( talk) 22:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Ducknish ( talk) 22:10, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I orginally produced the page, I will be translating it into arabic with sources. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alipiero ( talk • contribs) 18:59, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
INeverCry 00:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You're supporting the inclusion of unsourced stuff into articles with this edit, which is against the verifiability policy. Just wanted to let you know that I've reverted it, along with the companion one, and also warned the IP user who added it (two times, so far). Moreover, it was agreed not to include Skytrax-related information into airline articles.-- Jetstreamer Talk 12:49, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
I see you've cleaned up one of my 1st articles - thanks for showing me the way Ajkinwales ( talk) 17:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
....I done now?! [1] ;-) Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
ww2censor ( talk) 17:16, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
While certainly helpful in getting press coverage , it is not required under WP:NF that actors, writers, producers or directors be themselves independently notable or have their own articles. That's for the future. And while also helpful in gaining press coverage, WP:NF does not require that a film be a high-grossing studio blockbuster. What is a requirement under WP:NF is that a film receive coverage and analysis in independent sources. Evidence (film) has such coverage, as has been reflected in the article's expansion and improvement since you took it to AFD six minutes after it was created. More can be done, certainly, but we do well to not rush a brand new article into the ash heap. Is it one of the most notable films ever? No, not by a long shot. Does it have enough accepted genre coverage suitable for a low-budget independent film to merit inclusion within Wikipedia? I think yes. You are cordially invited back to the discussion. Best regards, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
I was just trying to see what had been done before the redirect and i didnt know how to go along doing it. im really sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Topazmarauder ( talk • contribs) 00:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
The article Sanco S.A. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Boleyn (
talk)
16:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)