Are you simply arguing about my article to "prolong the discussion" and generate more Cruftcruft? If so, that is inappropriate. Your reasoning on all responses so far has been hasty, and your research into the policies and guidelines cited has been shallow. If your user page is just a joke, and you intend to approach community responsibility seriously, then please research the rules more carefully. The way you are proceeding makes it seem that your user page is serious, and you simply want to create arguments and disrupt the creative process here on Wikipedia. -- John ( talk) 00:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
I didn't see anything wrong w/ the user page. It's a wide-wide world out there. someone is bound to get offended by something, that it no real reason to remove it. But hey, it's your user page. I just don't think you should feel bad about it. Protonk ( talk) 19:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Rejectwater. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Scott Campbell (disambiguation), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: its a redirect page not a dab page. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 07:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments, the issues you pointed out have now been corrected. Hopefully I will hear from an assessor soon, there seems to be little assessment activity on both Project Sweden and Project Football at the moment. Good luck with your own article!
Reckless182 ( talk) 11:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I would appreciate it if you could give a peek into the newly-created article 6th Asian Film Awards. Any suggestions for improvement can be discussed at my talk page. Regards, ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 10:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Detroit Red Wings records, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bryan Murray and Jack Adams ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Good catch, DPL bot. Keep it up. Rejectwater ( talk) 00:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey Cirt, I appreciated your comments on the Peer review for List of Detroit Red Wings draft picks. I have just made a peer review request for List of Detroit Red Wings seasons, if you could review that page as well and offer your input it would also be greatly apprecitated. Thanks again. Cheers, Rejectwater ( talk) 20:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you could add those comments (above) about Fuck (film) to Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck (film)/archive1? — Cirt ( talk) 18:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Montreal Canadiens seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland Rosebuds ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I've left some comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Detroit Red Wings seasons/archive1. Cheers, — Cirt ( talk) 21:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I've responded to your issues about the article. Toa Nidhiki05 03:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of Detroit Red Wings award winners may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:18, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I gave my support to you're article (
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Detroit Red Wings draft picks/archive1). I was wondering if you would be interested on reviewing
Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series, it is currently a
FLC. This would mean the world to me, if you will be willing!
SoapFan12
Talk page here
20:44, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Rejectwater, I believe it's time to resolved you're comments. Don't you think you should go by what delegate told me about the overlinking? If I prefer it being overlink, it will be overlink. Plus, my co-nominator is abousetly right: ″the visual look of the table appear inconsistent and potentially confusing to readers. A reader looking for just this year's nominees would wonder why some names were linked and others weren't″.
SoapFan12
Talk
18:30, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your assistance with adding stubs for the players, as well as your comments. Would you be willing to support the article for promotion now? Please advise if anything else needs to be done. Anthony (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings:
I made no additions to Silver Bridge concerning memorialization (nor Mothman).
- Leonard G. ( talk) 00:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of Detroit Red Wings award winners may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of Detroit Red Wings award winners may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Rejectwater, you were so good with the ALT images help for Fuck (film), I was wondering if you could help out with Beck v. Eiland-Hall?
I've put the page up for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Beck v. Eiland-Hall/archive1, and someone has raised a valid point about filling out ALT text.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 17:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Notifying you because you participated in the Peer Review.
Fuck (film) is a candidate for Featured Article quality — comments would be appreciated at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck (film)/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 18:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Cheers,
— Cirt ( talk) 04:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The FLC you asked about on my talk page was recently closed as a non-promotion and removed from the main FLC page. A bot handles the rest of an FLC closure, but it doesn't seem to have gotten to this one for some reason. I'll ask about it at FLC talk. Giants2008 ( Talk) 01:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
Thank you for your help copy editing
Fuck (film) on its way to
WP:FA.
Much appreciated! — Cirt ( talk) 22:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you kindly, I was glad to help. Regards, Rejectwater ( talk) 22:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey. I was wondering if you'd be willing to provide some feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/Arthur Gould (rugby union)/archive1? Understand if you're busy or unable to help, but would really appreciate any input. Thanks! - Shudde talk 10:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi can you comment on this nomination. — Vensatry (Ping me) 03:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello Rejectwriter, I'm here to let you know that your unresolved comment "You have unbundled them, which is good, but it is still unclear which citation supports what information in the table. Each row..." in this FLC has been resolved so I guess you should put them in your resolved comments if you're satisfied, thanks.— FrankBoy (Buzz) 13:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
As an active member of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, you should be aware that there has been a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment concerning how NHOCKEY will be interpreted. Dolovis ( talk) 14:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Rejectwater. There are unaddressed comments at your FLC nomination. Could you please address them? — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 01:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James E. Norris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Norris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
How exactly is indicating when a team made the playoffs with a certain color redundant and unnecessary? It's like that for all the other sports so why is it any different for ice hockey? ThatSportsGuy ( talk) 16:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Rejectwater. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Detroit Red Wings head coaches – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 6. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Are you simply arguing about my article to "prolong the discussion" and generate more Cruftcruft? If so, that is inappropriate. Your reasoning on all responses so far has been hasty, and your research into the policies and guidelines cited has been shallow. If your user page is just a joke, and you intend to approach community responsibility seriously, then please research the rules more carefully. The way you are proceeding makes it seem that your user page is serious, and you simply want to create arguments and disrupt the creative process here on Wikipedia. -- John ( talk) 00:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
I didn't see anything wrong w/ the user page. It's a wide-wide world out there. someone is bound to get offended by something, that it no real reason to remove it. But hey, it's your user page. I just don't think you should feel bad about it. Protonk ( talk) 19:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Rejectwater. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Scott Campbell (disambiguation), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: its a redirect page not a dab page. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 07:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments, the issues you pointed out have now been corrected. Hopefully I will hear from an assessor soon, there seems to be little assessment activity on both Project Sweden and Project Football at the moment. Good luck with your own article!
Reckless182 ( talk) 11:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I would appreciate it if you could give a peek into the newly-created article 6th Asian Film Awards. Any suggestions for improvement can be discussed at my talk page. Regards, ~*~ Ankit Bhatt~*~ 10:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Detroit Red Wings records, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bryan Murray and Jack Adams ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Good catch, DPL bot. Keep it up. Rejectwater ( talk) 00:16, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey Cirt, I appreciated your comments on the Peer review for List of Detroit Red Wings draft picks. I have just made a peer review request for List of Detroit Red Wings seasons, if you could review that page as well and offer your input it would also be greatly apprecitated. Thanks again. Cheers, Rejectwater ( talk) 20:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Perhaps you could add those comments (above) about Fuck (film) to Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck (film)/archive1? — Cirt ( talk) 18:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Montreal Canadiens seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland Rosebuds ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I've left some comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Detroit Red Wings seasons/archive1. Cheers, — Cirt ( talk) 21:59, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I've responded to your issues about the article. Toa Nidhiki05 03:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of Detroit Red Wings award winners may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 13:18, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I gave my support to you're article (
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Detroit Red Wings draft picks/archive1). I was wondering if you would be interested on reviewing
Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series, it is currently a
FLC. This would mean the world to me, if you will be willing!
SoapFan12
Talk page here
20:44, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Hey Rejectwater, I believe it's time to resolved you're comments. Don't you think you should go by what delegate told me about the overlinking? If I prefer it being overlink, it will be overlink. Plus, my co-nominator is abousetly right: ″the visual look of the table appear inconsistent and potentially confusing to readers. A reader looking for just this year's nominees would wonder why some names were linked and others weren't″.
SoapFan12
Talk
18:30, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your assistance with adding stubs for the players, as well as your comments. Would you be willing to support the article for promotion now? Please advise if anything else needs to be done. Anthony (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings:
I made no additions to Silver Bridge concerning memorialization (nor Mothman).
- Leonard G. ( talk) 00:54, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of Detroit Red Wings award winners may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 20:19, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
List of Detroit Red Wings award winners may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Rejectwater, you were so good with the ALT images help for Fuck (film), I was wondering if you could help out with Beck v. Eiland-Hall?
I've put the page up for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Beck v. Eiland-Hall/archive1, and someone has raised a valid point about filling out ALT text.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 17:07, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Notifying you because you participated in the Peer Review.
Fuck (film) is a candidate for Featured Article quality — comments would be appreciated at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck (film)/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 18:12, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
Cheers,
— Cirt ( talk) 04:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
The FLC you asked about on my talk page was recently closed as a non-promotion and removed from the main FLC page. A bot handles the rest of an FLC closure, but it doesn't seem to have gotten to this one for some reason. I'll ask about it at FLC talk. Giants2008 ( Talk) 01:41, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
Thank you for your help copy editing
Fuck (film) on its way to
WP:FA.
Much appreciated! — Cirt ( talk) 22:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thank you kindly, I was glad to help. Regards, Rejectwater ( talk) 22:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey. I was wondering if you'd be willing to provide some feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/Arthur Gould (rugby union)/archive1? Understand if you're busy or unable to help, but would really appreciate any input. Thanks! - Shudde talk 10:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi can you comment on this nomination. — Vensatry (Ping me) 03:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello Rejectwriter, I'm here to let you know that your unresolved comment "You have unbundled them, which is good, but it is still unclear which citation supports what information in the table. Each row..." in this FLC has been resolved so I guess you should put them in your resolved comments if you're satisfied, thanks.— FrankBoy (Buzz) 13:04, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
As an active member of the WikiProject Ice Hockey, you should be aware that there has been a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/League assessment concerning how NHOCKEY will be interpreted. Dolovis ( talk) 14:33, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Rejectwater. There are unaddressed comments at your FLC nomination. Could you please address them? — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
I've listed the article Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties for peer review.
Help with furthering along the quality improvement process would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Fuck: Word Taboo and Protecting Our First Amendment Liberties/archive1.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt ( talk) 01:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James E. Norris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Norris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:58, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
How exactly is indicating when a team made the playoffs with a certain color redundant and unnecessary? It's like that for all the other sports so why is it any different for ice hockey? ThatSportsGuy ( talk) 16:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Rejectwater. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Detroit Red Wings head coaches – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for June 6. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 ( Talk) 21:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)