Hi. I suggest you try to justify on Talk:Sheet music why you continue to add this link to the article in spite of several other established editors reverting you. Edit warring is discouraged here; if you restore your link more than 3 times in a 24 hour period, your account will be blocked. Please use the article talk page to resolve a dispute. Also, your edit history suggests that you have a conflict of interest regarding this link. If you are associated with this link, you should not be adding it, but rather suggest it on the talk page and let the community decide. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 20:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi !
Thank you for your participation. I’m really disappointed with behaviour of one of the editors. I don’t know who exactly remove my links from 2 pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheet_music
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piano
but it’s really disappointing.
I can’t find nothing about it on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sheet_music
Free Sheet Piano Music is a free, unique(!), noncommercial resource. I don’t want to have a battle with editors that representing sites on Wikipedia, I’m just thinking that a free resources with unique and popular content have rights to be added in right places. I didn’t made errors with editing, adding or appropriate placing. And I didn’t make rules violation. If someone has a problem with content added by me – he can contact me. If someone delete the link – I’m expecting a comment. One more time “Free Sheet Piano Music” is a free non commercial resource with unique content. Hope you can help me to claim this settlement. Thank you very much.
Ou! If you still not make attention, I was talking about UNIQUE ressource. And maybe you can give me anothe one site listed here that consacred to "easy-version"(!) for the adults-beginners??? And I'm sorry but there is no violation of guidelines, and it fits the article very well.
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in
sheet music. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. The
three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ~
Amatulić (
talk)
17:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Piano. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Oda Mari (
talk)
17:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: it spells "A nigger" backwards. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?
I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.
You have several options freely available to you:
Thank you. - kotra ( talk) 19:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Piss off!!! Check this:
Hi. I suggest you try to justify on Talk:Sheet music why you continue to add this link to the article in spite of several other established editors reverting you. Edit warring is discouraged here; if you restore your link more than 3 times in a 24 hour period, your account will be blocked. Please use the article talk page to resolve a dispute. Also, your edit history suggests that you have a conflict of interest regarding this link. If you are associated with this link, you should not be adding it, but rather suggest it on the talk page and let the community decide. ~ Amatulić ( talk) 20:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi !
Thank you for your participation. I’m really disappointed with behaviour of one of the editors. I don’t know who exactly remove my links from 2 pages:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheet_music
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piano
but it’s really disappointing.
I can’t find nothing about it on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sheet_music
Free Sheet Piano Music is a free, unique(!), noncommercial resource. I don’t want to have a battle with editors that representing sites on Wikipedia, I’m just thinking that a free resources with unique and popular content have rights to be added in right places. I didn’t made errors with editing, adding or appropriate placing. And I didn’t make rules violation. If someone has a problem with content added by me – he can contact me. If someone delete the link – I’m expecting a comment. One more time “Free Sheet Piano Music” is a free non commercial resource with unique content. Hope you can help me to claim this settlement. Thank you very much.
Ou! If you still not make attention, I was talking about UNIQUE ressource. And maybe you can give me anothe one site listed here that consacred to "easy-version"(!) for the adults-beginners??? And I'm sorry but there is no violation of guidelines, and it fits the article very well.
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in
sheet music. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. The
three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ~
Amatulić (
talk)
17:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to
Piano. It is considered
spamming and
Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Oda Mari (
talk)
17:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: it spells "A nigger" backwards. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?
I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.
You have several options freely available to you:
Thank you. - kotra ( talk) 19:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Piss off!!! Check this: