Sorry, you are wrong. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 18:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Are you saying that this: (NOTE: Natural Selection is a theory not a fact) was making that distinction between Scientific theory and fact? It reads like the disclamier from creationists, not as something well sourced or objective. --
Kim van der Linde
at venus
20:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Why is there that urgent need to make that distinction? And please, sign your posts at talk pages with four ~ as in ~~~~, it facilitates discussion -- Kim van der Linde at venus 20:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, you are wrong. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 18:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Are you saying that this: (NOTE: Natural Selection is a theory not a fact) was making that distinction between Scientific theory and fact? It reads like the disclamier from creationists, not as something well sourced or objective. --
Kim van der Linde
at venus
20:23, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Why is there that urgent need to make that distinction? And please, sign your posts at talk pages with four ~ as in ~~~~, it facilitates discussion -- Kim van der Linde at venus 20:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)