With respect to sources we follow WP:MEDRS. The source you are using is not sufficient. Please use review articles. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:37, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Per this 2013 review seems to be still investigational in nature. It however does look promising. May be appropriate in a research section if proper sources are used. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24062768 Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:43, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Great this is a review [1] the second article however is not and is rather old.
With respect to referencing this gives some advice WP:MEDHOW. Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
With respect to sources we follow WP:MEDRS. The source you are using is not sufficient. Please use review articles. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:37, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Per this 2013 review seems to be still investigational in nature. It however does look promising. May be appropriate in a research section if proper sources are used. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24062768 Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:43, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Great this is a review [1] the second article however is not and is rather old.
With respect to referencing this gives some advice WP:MEDHOW. Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 17:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)