 | Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Jvolkblum ( talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. |
Redforeman2010 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Orlady does not provide a sufficient justification for her request for a user check OR explanation for the course of action taken against me; she has failed to follow proper wikipedia procedure, blocking my account as a sockpuppet and removing my history without any notification, without having filed any investigation and thus without any supporting evidence. She then filed a sockpuppet investigation request after having already labeled me a Sockpuppet on my talk page and as a suspected sockpuppet on my main page. Orlady also fails to provide any evidence to justify filing a sockpuppet investigation or a checkuser request. (her evidence: "Newly registered user. Quacks like a duck: several edits are the same as those done by earlier Jvolkblum sockpuppet User:MisterPitt. Requesting checkuser to see if there are other ducks swimming nearby.") There is nothing here to support even raising an eyebrow at me. Furthermore, Orlady has previously filed hundred(s) of sockpuppet reports linking to Jvolkblum in similar fashion. She is clearly letting personal issues affect her judgement
Decline reason:
First of all, blaming someone else will not get your block lifted. Secondly, with similar edits, the connection seems pretty clear. Your request does not convince me that you should be unblocked. TN X Man 17:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
| Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Jvolkblum ( talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. |
Redforeman2010 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Orlady does not provide a sufficient justification for her request for a user check OR explanation for the course of action taken against me; she has failed to follow proper wikipedia procedure, blocking my account as a sockpuppet and removing my history without any notification, without having filed any investigation and thus without any supporting evidence. She then filed a sockpuppet investigation request after having already labeled me a Sockpuppet on my talk page and as a suspected sockpuppet on my main page. Orlady also fails to provide any evidence to justify filing a sockpuppet investigation or a checkuser request. (her evidence: "Newly registered user. Quacks like a duck: several edits are the same as those done by earlier Jvolkblum sockpuppet User:MisterPitt. Requesting checkuser to see if there are other ducks swimming nearby.") There is nothing here to support even raising an eyebrow at me. Furthermore, Orlady has previously filed hundred(s) of sockpuppet reports linking to Jvolkblum in similar fashion. She is clearly letting personal issues affect her judgement
Decline reason:
First of all, blaming someone else will not get your block lifted. Secondly, with similar edits, the connection seems pretty clear. Your request does not convince me that you should be unblocked. TN X Man 17:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.