From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Josh Warrington

This edit is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia and has been reverted per MOS:PUFFERY. Stick to facts, not opinions. Do not WP:Edit war it back in please. – 2. O. Boxing 16:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Also, please read WP:OWNERSHIP. You may be the "original author" of this content, but you by no means own it. You can't remove something because you're unhappy that others have altered it to make it more appropriate for an encyclopaedia. – 2. O. Boxing 10:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC) reply

3RR

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Josh Warrington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – 2. O. Boxing 19:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2. O. Boxing 19:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Edit warring at Josh Warrington

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Josh Warrington

This edit is not appropriate for an encyclopaedia and has been reverted per MOS:PUFFERY. Stick to facts, not opinions. Do not WP:Edit war it back in please. – 2. O. Boxing 16:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Also, please read WP:OWNERSHIP. You may be the "original author" of this content, but you by no means own it. You can't remove something because you're unhappy that others have altered it to make it more appropriate for an encyclopaedia. – 2. O. Boxing 10:48, 15 February 2021 (UTC) reply

3RR

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Josh Warrington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – 2. O. Boxing 19:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 2. O. Boxing 19:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Edit warring at Josh Warrington

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston ( talk) 04:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook