![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | → | Archive 35 |
Greetings, did you see this ping? Posting here to confirm. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Could you please help me list it for deletion review? I am confused as to how to do it. The subject has since won silver medal in Gina Bachauer International Piano Competition [1] Thanks so much, and also, I got your message on my talk page about writing about topics close to me. Just FYI, I am a scout for a management company for young musicians so I just discovered Nathan Lee. I will take care though to make sure my edits are not promotional. THANKS!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanWon ( talk • contribs) 06:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
-Thanks!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanWon ( talk • contribs) 06:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
I borrowed this essay of yours to provide extra context for a Military history Project Academy Course on article deletion. I hope you don't mind, but I thought it would make a good complement to the already well establish Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions essay. TomStar81 ( Talk) 23:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the message you posted on my talk page. I'll avoid his name should I see it as you suggest. Willowandglass ( talk) 17:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
I am writing to invite you to the upcoming
WikiConference North America to be held in
San Diego Friday to Monday 7-10 October. Here are further details:
I know that you have supported organizations in contributing to Wikipedia and that you have ideas about community organization. I think we have not met in person, but from what I know you seem like the sort of person who would enjoy a meetup of this sort if you were able to attend. If you have interest and availability to attend and would like assistance either in making a program submission or a scholarship application then let me know, and I might be able to help in some way. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC) |
Let me know when and where you have drafted your criterion for CSD non notable book. You have my support. Is it going to be a sub section of A&? -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Yesterday I stumbled upon Draft:Anantara Hotels, Resorts & Spas in CAT:CSD. I took a cursory glance at the page, saw it reasonably well-referenced with a slightly promotional tone that could be sort of expected, maybe even created by the company's PR, but being far from spam. I also noticed that a) its publication to mainspace has been denied on notability (!) grounds by LaMona, who has recently been criticized at ANI for being too demanding on draft publications, requiring perfection and often citing quite spurious notability concerns (Anantara Hotels are one of the most important chains in Asia [2]) and b) it has been tagged by SwisterTwister, also criticized for complete lack of research in CSD tagging and AfD nominations, and who has recently narrowly escaped a NPP topic ban for those reasons.
Out of sheer curiosity, I put the draft on my watchlist, not bothering to contest the speedy, expecting an admin to decline the deletion. It was IMO nowhere near the G11 criterion: pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION
. It wasn't exclusively promotional and it didn't need to be fundamentally rewritten, just edited for tone.
Now, I don't care about Anantara hotels, and I'm far from being an inclusionist, but I am concerned with the process. A salvageable draft on a notable company gets declined by an overzealous reviewer, tagged by an overzealous patroller, and speedily deleted by an admin contrary to G11. Had that article been created straight in the mainspace, it would survive an AfD with flying colors. If we cannot accommodate creation on notable company articles and edit out the promotional tone by our regular processes, it's no wonder we are witnessing proliferation of undisclosed paid editing.
I'm not sure if I'll pursue any further action, but I'd like to share my concerns and hear your thoughts on the matter first. No such user ( talk) 07:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
P.S. If we're going to discuss the draft's contents, I would appreciate if you could temporarily undelete it to draft space or my userspace. No such user ( talk) 07:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notabilitywhen it contains
Currently, the company operates resorts in Thailand, Cambodia, Maldives, Indonesia, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and China, sourced to Bloomberg.com, shows 50,000 employees, and lists no less than six awards by organizations that don't seem like award mills. And of course, it lacks any mention of criticism and controversy; but maybe there isn't any to speak of? As a big and rich hotel chain, they seem to invest in nature conservation and charity projects – surely that's worth a mention? No such user ( talk) 09:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tokyogirl79, I notice that you spent some time on this bio in March, and it appears very much like new COI IP accounts have started to edit there again. I've requested page protection. Any further assistance and perspective you may provide will be helpful. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:27, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Nursing editathon &
Women Labor Activists editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
![]() |
Hey, Thanks I need help |
how do i format my draft properly? Skyegh1234 ( talk) 16:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC) |
Dear Tokyogirl79, I thank you for your valuable feedback, guidance and time. Such guidance and feedback from Wikipedians like you motivates people like me in a very positive manner to follow guidelines and policies of Wikipedia strictly. Thanks once again. -- Piyushratnu ( talk) 07:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Check out the following new article improvement drives/contests. North America 1000 11:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
I would appreciate getting your input on the Anime Matsuri article. Long story short, AnimeDisneylover95 and I have been in a long term back and forth about sources. AnimeCons.com now provides all of the content we would normally use for the article, including attendance figures and guests lists, and I usually remove any primary sources used at that point. AnimeDisneylover95 feels that Facebook sources should remain despite them now being redundant. This latest back and forth started of the simple fact of them not using sources at all for the latest guests, of which I revered and posted to their talk page. So far on most of these issues, AnimeDisneylover95 will not talk except in rare circumstances on their talk page, or only communicates via the edit summary, while reverting any warning posts on their talk page.
I've gone back in, did all the usual cleanup including removing those redundant sources, cited the guests, but made additional updates as some content had changed. Again, reverted, but this time they've missed most of the new edits. At this point, if I have to walk away on the Facebook issue, so be it, but AnimeDisneylover95 needs to at least have basic communication to improve the article. They seem very intent on using Facebook Primary Sources, something not exactly usual. Esw01407 ( talk) 01:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pinging me when you restored Creately from a deleted PROD. I have neither the mop nor the secret handshake so am unsure about what the book of rules says in these cases, but I do wonder if it might be better restoring such articles as Drafts rather than into main space. That would at least encourage (although not enforce) a review of the content before it came back as a fully fledged article. It might just save some time in managing AfDs. Regards Velella Velella Talk 19:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
I noticed that you were the last person to delete the page for Kyle Kulinski. I request that the page be able to be recreated to be redirected to the Secular Talk page. Kyle is more than big enough to have his page created for redirection. His channel is the 5th largest political channel in terms of views on YouTube at 19.5 Million+ views a month, making his content some of the most viewed political commentary online. In addition, he regularly appears on The Young Turks and other TV news shows. TempTTC ( talk) 22:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Murph9000 referred me to you. Please tell me why you deleted 2Leaf Press. Thanks. Gdavid01 ( talk) 19:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for that nomination - it doesn't look notable to me, and it's blatantly self authored.
But one thing - Mr. Jeffries is a New Zealander so uses dd/mm/yy notation. He is saying it will be released on the 3rd December. Blythwood ( talk) 02:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Tokyogirl79. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review
the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'
mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture &
Women in Archaeology editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Tokyogirl79. A while back you helped me sift through some possible sources for Sarah Tiana at Talk:Sarah Tiana#Possible sources. I have been looking for better sources off and on since then, but have not found anything at all. I also noted that User talk:Tokyogirl79/Archive 26#Sarah Tiana s statement was made which says Tiana's filmography should make her notable. Unfortunately, I cannot find anything in their which seems to satisfy WP:NACTOR.The only possibility I can see is "Has a large fan base or a significant 'cult' following", but I am not sure how this is assessed. The article has been edited a bit recently by the same SPA who created the article, but no additional sourcing has been provided at all. Anyway, I am wondering if you would mind taking another peak at the article when you get a spare minute or two and see if AfD may be warranted here. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I see that you nominated MindStir Media for speedy deletion giving G5 (creation by a block-evading editor) as a reason, although the article was created on 13 July, while the sockmaster was not blocked until 5 September. It doesn't make a lot of difference in this case, as I have deleted the article under CDS G11 (promotion) anyway, but it may be worth watching out for similar mistakes, as it could make a difference another time. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 10:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear TokyoGirl, I noticed you deleted the page "National Capital Poison Center". I kindly request to recreate the page. I'm writing about an NGO - not sure what you were referring to in terms of "unambiguous advertising". Happy to take a look at the copy you noted was taken from another WP page and cite it accordingly. Sincerely SherlockPoems ( talk) 21:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the tips. Interestingly in the AAPC article you're quoting the telephone number is ok to be used. Can you please provide me at least with the copy of my original article so that I can modify it according to your comments and work with the teahouse - I don't have any copies of it. Thanks in advance. SherlockPoems ( talk) 16:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear Tokyogirl79,
I saw your profile on Wikipedia and realised you make very objective comments. You seem like a nice person who makes sense.
For a start, two of my entries were accepted Kok Heng Leun and Lim Teck Yin, but I thought I could further improve in my writing quality, especially when it comes to bio writing and helping local talents.
I am new to Wikipedia, so can I trouble you to help me improve or comment on this draft entry? : )
/info/en/?search=Draft:Kwong_Weng_Yap
PS: Yes, I was scouting, and Yap was on the news lately. So I thought he merited a wiki page after zooming through his online stuff. Realized it's not a one-time off event that he received some national fame. I think he does have something credible going on.
Thats why I decided to write it, and string it together first.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Warmest, Superwifi ( talk) 08:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Dear Tokyogirl79, Thank you for your reply. Hope school is treating you well! The start of the semester is always rather tedious. Anyway, I just put up the article but still await for your valuable inputs so I can improve on the article. : ) I have created three articles now, each with its own merit. But am trying to do better for each one. Please kindly take a look:
/info/en/?search=Kwong_Weng_Yap
Warmest Superwifi ( talk) 18:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Dear Tokyogal79,
Let me start off by saying a huge thank you. Your inputs were useful, relevant and precise. To be honest, I was trying different methods of expressing myself in this one, i.e. quotes, primary sources, opinions. I am now much clearer, and agree with the points you made. There is no COI here. My English is definitely not good enough to get paid to do up a professional wiki article. Nevertheless, I wish I could be paid more on my job in very expensive Singapore. :) Oh and yes, I was confused between book review and book blurbs. I thought the comments made on the book can be used in the article but it is clear now. Pardon my ignorance... Anyway, let me now work on finding sources to substantiate the points, and continue to improve the article.
One quick question: there are currently no references on both books listed in the article. Would editors be keen to know where the books came from? I found one review from a magazine that reviewed Yap's book but couldn't find any review for the Special Forces book. Should I just include the primary source references or just leave it as it is, since editors would check online anyway if they wanted to verify? Once again, thank you very much for pointing out to me the mistakes I would have made otherwise.
Wishing you a wonderful day ahead. Warmest, Superwifi ( talk) 16:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tokyogirl79 I appreciate your feedback it definitely helps to edit my submission, however I have to question the fact that you claim that for an actor to be on a broadway play as a performer it's not reason enough to make him notable... I disagree... there are thousand of actors that never even make it to a NY stage so I think being one of the best, being cast on a show in one of the most competitive cities in the world is something to show for. You can search for actors on wikipidia that have done movies and never won awards and they still have approved pages...
also I based our page on another voice teacher's wikipedia page, and this one is live
/info/en/?search=Seth_Riggs how was his page approved when he never won awards and in my view as more self promotion then our submission...?
happy to continue to do edits on my end, just think that our page can go live with some minor adjustments and not be declined based on your current feedback and judgement of our sources (as they are, for our industry, the leading channels at this point).
Let me know what you think,
Thanks so much!!
Andre Farnsworth (
talk) 16:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Andre Farnsworth
Just because I like your username. :)
AIZEN
MEMORY•
THOUGHT 01:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Needs immediate blocking, suppression etc. Cheers, Muffled Pocketed 10:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
I would just like to say thank you for the quick action on that. The sock will probably be back. Good thing I don't scare easily.
--
Majora (
talk) 22:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KurdoKardir for the newest sock. I'm also asking if you would be willing to ECP that page due to the persistent sock puppetry that semi is not seeming to fix. -- Majora ( talk) 23:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank You for trying to keep my page in Wikipedia alive.....You are right....my name is also in a dictionnary...please let me know as to how I can improve the page. I have included 2 links...one about my book from Amazon.ca and my interview about my book in Youtube....You can also see my Curriculum Vitae in Academia.
Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by JERRY1414 ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I don't have the sockmaster history to file on him, nor the sorcery to see how close this article matches previous ones, so letting you and your stalkers know. :) Crow Caw 18:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Tokyogirl79:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
–
North America
1000 00:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | → | Archive 35 |
Greetings, did you see this ping? Posting here to confirm. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 08:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Could you please help me list it for deletion review? I am confused as to how to do it. The subject has since won silver medal in Gina Bachauer International Piano Competition [1] Thanks so much, and also, I got your message on my talk page about writing about topics close to me. Just FYI, I am a scout for a management company for young musicians so I just discovered Nathan Lee. I will take care though to make sure my edits are not promotional. THANKS!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanWon ( talk • contribs) 06:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
-Thanks!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanWon ( talk • contribs) 06:26, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
I borrowed this essay of yours to provide extra context for a Military history Project Academy Course on article deletion. I hope you don't mind, but I thought it would make a good complement to the already well establish Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions essay. TomStar81 ( Talk) 23:39, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the message you posted on my talk page. I'll avoid his name should I see it as you suggest. Willowandglass ( talk) 17:05, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
I am writing to invite you to the upcoming
WikiConference North America to be held in
San Diego Friday to Monday 7-10 October. Here are further details:
I know that you have supported organizations in contributing to Wikipedia and that you have ideas about community organization. I think we have not met in person, but from what I know you seem like the sort of person who would enjoy a meetup of this sort if you were able to attend. If you have interest and availability to attend and would like assistance either in making a program submission or a scholarship application then let me know, and I might be able to help in some way. Thanks. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC) |
Let me know when and where you have drafted your criterion for CSD non notable book. You have my support. Is it going to be a sub section of A&? -- Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:41, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Yesterday I stumbled upon Draft:Anantara Hotels, Resorts & Spas in CAT:CSD. I took a cursory glance at the page, saw it reasonably well-referenced with a slightly promotional tone that could be sort of expected, maybe even created by the company's PR, but being far from spam. I also noticed that a) its publication to mainspace has been denied on notability (!) grounds by LaMona, who has recently been criticized at ANI for being too demanding on draft publications, requiring perfection and often citing quite spurious notability concerns (Anantara Hotels are one of the most important chains in Asia [2]) and b) it has been tagged by SwisterTwister, also criticized for complete lack of research in CSD tagging and AfD nominations, and who has recently narrowly escaped a NPP topic ban for those reasons.
Out of sheer curiosity, I put the draft on my watchlist, not bothering to contest the speedy, expecting an admin to decline the deletion. It was IMO nowhere near the G11 criterion: pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION
. It wasn't exclusively promotional and it didn't need to be fundamentally rewritten, just edited for tone.
Now, I don't care about Anantara hotels, and I'm far from being an inclusionist, but I am concerned with the process. A salvageable draft on a notable company gets declined by an overzealous reviewer, tagged by an overzealous patroller, and speedily deleted by an admin contrary to G11. Had that article been created straight in the mainspace, it would survive an AfD with flying colors. If we cannot accommodate creation on notable company articles and edit out the promotional tone by our regular processes, it's no wonder we are witnessing proliferation of undisclosed paid editing.
I'm not sure if I'll pursue any further action, but I'd like to share my concerns and hear your thoughts on the matter first. No such user ( talk) 07:36, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
P.S. If we're going to discuss the draft's contents, I would appreciate if you could temporarily undelete it to draft space or my userspace. No such user ( talk) 07:39, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notabilitywhen it contains
Currently, the company operates resorts in Thailand, Cambodia, Maldives, Indonesia, the United Arab Emirates, Oman, and China, sourced to Bloomberg.com, shows 50,000 employees, and lists no less than six awards by organizations that don't seem like award mills. And of course, it lacks any mention of criticism and controversy; but maybe there isn't any to speak of? As a big and rich hotel chain, they seem to invest in nature conservation and charity projects – surely that's worth a mention? No such user ( talk) 09:26, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tokyogirl79, I notice that you spent some time on this bio in March, and it appears very much like new COI IP accounts have started to edit there again. I've requested page protection. Any further assistance and perspective you may provide will be helpful. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 ( talk) 15:27, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Nursing editathon &
Women Labor Activists editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
![]() |
Hey, Thanks I need help |
how do i format my draft properly? Skyegh1234 ( talk) 16:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC) |
Dear Tokyogirl79, I thank you for your valuable feedback, guidance and time. Such guidance and feedback from Wikipedians like you motivates people like me in a very positive manner to follow guidelines and policies of Wikipedia strictly. Thanks once again. -- Piyushratnu ( talk) 07:33, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
Check out the following new article improvement drives/contests. North America 1000 11:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
I would appreciate getting your input on the Anime Matsuri article. Long story short, AnimeDisneylover95 and I have been in a long term back and forth about sources. AnimeCons.com now provides all of the content we would normally use for the article, including attendance figures and guests lists, and I usually remove any primary sources used at that point. AnimeDisneylover95 feels that Facebook sources should remain despite them now being redundant. This latest back and forth started of the simple fact of them not using sources at all for the latest guests, of which I revered and posted to their talk page. So far on most of these issues, AnimeDisneylover95 will not talk except in rare circumstances on their talk page, or only communicates via the edit summary, while reverting any warning posts on their talk page.
I've gone back in, did all the usual cleanup including removing those redundant sources, cited the guests, but made additional updates as some content had changed. Again, reverted, but this time they've missed most of the new edits. At this point, if I have to walk away on the Facebook issue, so be it, but AnimeDisneylover95 needs to at least have basic communication to improve the article. They seem very intent on using Facebook Primary Sources, something not exactly usual. Esw01407 ( talk) 01:06, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for pinging me when you restored Creately from a deleted PROD. I have neither the mop nor the secret handshake so am unsure about what the book of rules says in these cases, but I do wonder if it might be better restoring such articles as Drafts rather than into main space. That would at least encourage (although not enforce) a review of the content before it came back as a fully fledged article. It might just save some time in managing AfDs. Regards Velella Velella Talk 19:54, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
I noticed that you were the last person to delete the page for Kyle Kulinski. I request that the page be able to be recreated to be redirected to the Secular Talk page. Kyle is more than big enough to have his page created for redirection. His channel is the 5th largest political channel in terms of views on YouTube at 19.5 Million+ views a month, making his content some of the most viewed political commentary online. In addition, he regularly appears on The Young Turks and other TV news shows. TempTTC ( talk) 22:02, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Murph9000 referred me to you. Please tell me why you deleted 2Leaf Press. Thanks. Gdavid01 ( talk) 19:50, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for that nomination - it doesn't look notable to me, and it's blatantly self authored.
But one thing - Mr. Jeffries is a New Zealander so uses dd/mm/yy notation. He is saying it will be released on the 3rd December. Blythwood ( talk) 02:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Tokyogirl79. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
Please review
the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators'
mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture &
Women in Archaeology editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Tokyogirl79. A while back you helped me sift through some possible sources for Sarah Tiana at Talk:Sarah Tiana#Possible sources. I have been looking for better sources off and on since then, but have not found anything at all. I also noted that User talk:Tokyogirl79/Archive 26#Sarah Tiana s statement was made which says Tiana's filmography should make her notable. Unfortunately, I cannot find anything in their which seems to satisfy WP:NACTOR.The only possibility I can see is "Has a large fan base or a significant 'cult' following", but I am not sure how this is assessed. The article has been edited a bit recently by the same SPA who created the article, but no additional sourcing has been provided at all. Anyway, I am wondering if you would mind taking another peak at the article when you get a spare minute or two and see if AfD may be warranted here. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 01:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
I see that you nominated MindStir Media for speedy deletion giving G5 (creation by a block-evading editor) as a reason, although the article was created on 13 July, while the sockmaster was not blocked until 5 September. It doesn't make a lot of difference in this case, as I have deleted the article under CDS G11 (promotion) anyway, but it may be worth watching out for similar mistakes, as it could make a difference another time. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 10:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear TokyoGirl, I noticed you deleted the page "National Capital Poison Center". I kindly request to recreate the page. I'm writing about an NGO - not sure what you were referring to in terms of "unambiguous advertising". Happy to take a look at the copy you noted was taken from another WP page and cite it accordingly. Sincerely SherlockPoems ( talk) 21:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the tips. Interestingly in the AAPC article you're quoting the telephone number is ok to be used. Can you please provide me at least with the copy of my original article so that I can modify it according to your comments and work with the teahouse - I don't have any copies of it. Thanks in advance. SherlockPoems ( talk) 16:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Dear Tokyogirl79,
I saw your profile on Wikipedia and realised you make very objective comments. You seem like a nice person who makes sense.
For a start, two of my entries were accepted Kok Heng Leun and Lim Teck Yin, but I thought I could further improve in my writing quality, especially when it comes to bio writing and helping local talents.
I am new to Wikipedia, so can I trouble you to help me improve or comment on this draft entry? : )
/info/en/?search=Draft:Kwong_Weng_Yap
PS: Yes, I was scouting, and Yap was on the news lately. So I thought he merited a wiki page after zooming through his online stuff. Realized it's not a one-time off event that he received some national fame. I think he does have something credible going on.
Thats why I decided to write it, and string it together first.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Warmest, Superwifi ( talk) 08:30, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Dear Tokyogirl79, Thank you for your reply. Hope school is treating you well! The start of the semester is always rather tedious. Anyway, I just put up the article but still await for your valuable inputs so I can improve on the article. : ) I have created three articles now, each with its own merit. But am trying to do better for each one. Please kindly take a look:
/info/en/?search=Kwong_Weng_Yap
Warmest Superwifi ( talk) 18:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
Dear Tokyogal79,
Let me start off by saying a huge thank you. Your inputs were useful, relevant and precise. To be honest, I was trying different methods of expressing myself in this one, i.e. quotes, primary sources, opinions. I am now much clearer, and agree with the points you made. There is no COI here. My English is definitely not good enough to get paid to do up a professional wiki article. Nevertheless, I wish I could be paid more on my job in very expensive Singapore. :) Oh and yes, I was confused between book review and book blurbs. I thought the comments made on the book can be used in the article but it is clear now. Pardon my ignorance... Anyway, let me now work on finding sources to substantiate the points, and continue to improve the article.
One quick question: there are currently no references on both books listed in the article. Would editors be keen to know where the books came from? I found one review from a magazine that reviewed Yap's book but couldn't find any review for the Special Forces book. Should I just include the primary source references or just leave it as it is, since editors would check online anyway if they wanted to verify? Once again, thank you very much for pointing out to me the mistakes I would have made otherwise.
Wishing you a wonderful day ahead. Warmest, Superwifi ( talk) 16:39, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tokyogirl79 I appreciate your feedback it definitely helps to edit my submission, however I have to question the fact that you claim that for an actor to be on a broadway play as a performer it's not reason enough to make him notable... I disagree... there are thousand of actors that never even make it to a NY stage so I think being one of the best, being cast on a show in one of the most competitive cities in the world is something to show for. You can search for actors on wikipidia that have done movies and never won awards and they still have approved pages...
also I based our page on another voice teacher's wikipedia page, and this one is live
/info/en/?search=Seth_Riggs how was his page approved when he never won awards and in my view as more self promotion then our submission...?
happy to continue to do edits on my end, just think that our page can go live with some minor adjustments and not be declined based on your current feedback and judgement of our sources (as they are, for our industry, the leading channels at this point).
Let me know what you think,
Thanks so much!!
Andre Farnsworth (
talk) 16:35, 4 October 2016 (UTC)Andre Farnsworth
Just because I like your username. :)
AIZEN
MEMORY•
THOUGHT 01:54, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Needs immediate blocking, suppression etc. Cheers, Muffled Pocketed 10:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
I would just like to say thank you for the quick action on that. The sock will probably be back. Good thing I don't scare easily.
--
Majora (
talk) 22:39, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KurdoKardir for the newest sock. I'm also asking if you would be willing to ECP that page due to the persistent sock puppetry that semi is not seeming to fix. -- Majora ( talk) 23:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
Thank You for trying to keep my page in Wikipedia alive.....You are right....my name is also in a dictionnary...please let me know as to how I can improve the page. I have included 2 links...one about my book from Amazon.ca and my interview about my book in Youtube....You can also see my Curriculum Vitae in Academia.
Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by JERRY1414 ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I don't have the sockmaster history to file on him, nor the sorcery to see how close this article matches previous ones, so letting you and your stalkers know. :) Crow Caw 18:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello Tokyogirl79:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable
Halloween!
–
North America
1000 00:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)