Hello, I'm Galobtter. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Capital punishment in the United Arab Emirates, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Galobtter ( talk) 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Capital punishment in the United Arab Emirates, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius ( talk) 17:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Rayanmou07 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I wasn’t providing false information. I was just updating the article to match the current Penal Code. This was a false block. Rayanmou07 ( talk) 17:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your comments here and below conclusively demonstrate you need to remain blocked at this time. Yamla ( talk) 20:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your edits were incompetent, inserting content with a source as if that source applied to the whole list, but worse, you were editing without being logged in to gain an advantage--and then you tried to get others blocked. That's a no no. Next time, start by citing reliable sources, citing them properly (not bare URLs), and playing by the rules. Drmies ( talk) 17:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Rayanmou07 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I’m sorry for everything I have done. I have abused multiple accounts and I have tried to get others blocked. I would like to change my behavior and start citing reliable sources and playing by the rules. I’m sorry that I blamed others. I’m sorry for being rude and immature. Please forgive me. Rayanmou07 ( talk) 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rayanmou07 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am also sorry for edit warring and editing abusively when logged out. I’m sorry for everything PLUS the edit warring. I would love to edit Wikipedia again. Rayanmou07 ( talk) 14:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In the past month, you have used half a dozen socks, and you were evading while logged out just over a week ago; much of this came after you had assured us in the request above that you understood socking was wrong.
The persistent socking means that a) WP:3X applies, meaning that the community would have to sign off on an unblock request, and b) it seems exceedingly unlikely that anyone will unblock you without you taking some extended time off first (cf. WP:SO) – I certainly am. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 01:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rayanmou07 ( talk) 14:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Galobtter. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Capital punishment in the United Arab Emirates, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Galobtter ( talk) 03:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Capital punishment in the United Arab Emirates, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. AntiDionysius ( talk) 17:30, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Rayanmou07 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I wasn’t providing false information. I was just updating the article to match the current Penal Code. This was a false block. Rayanmou07 ( talk) 17:50, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your comments here and below conclusively demonstrate you need to remain blocked at this time. Yamla ( talk) 20:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your edits were incompetent, inserting content with a source as if that source applied to the whole list, but worse, you were editing without being logged in to gain an advantage--and then you tried to get others blocked. That's a no no. Next time, start by citing reliable sources, citing them properly (not bare URLs), and playing by the rules. Drmies ( talk) 17:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Rayanmou07 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I’m sorry for everything I have done. I have abused multiple accounts and I have tried to get others blocked. I would like to change my behavior and start citing reliable sources and playing by the rules. I’m sorry that I blamed others. I’m sorry for being rude and immature. Please forgive me. Rayanmou07 ( talk) 09:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rayanmou07 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am also sorry for edit warring and editing abusively when logged out. I’m sorry for everything PLUS the edit warring. I would love to edit Wikipedia again. Rayanmou07 ( talk) 14:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
In the past month, you have used half a dozen socks, and you were evading while logged out just over a week ago; much of this came after you had assured us in the request above that you understood socking was wrong.
The persistent socking means that a) WP:3X applies, meaning that the community would have to sign off on an unblock request, and b) it seems exceedingly unlikely that anyone will unblock you without you taking some extended time off first (cf. WP:SO) – I certainly am. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 01:47, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rayanmou07 ( talk) 14:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)