Welcome!
Hello, Rawjapan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
FeydHuxtable (
talk)
17:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Rawjapan, thanks very much for the good improvements you made to the Currency war article. Just as a minor point, as there are plans to promote Currency war to Good article status, if you add references to a TV appearance, could you ideally add the date and name of the program so the reference can be verified? Best wishes FeydHuxtable ( talk) 17:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I reverted your changes to Aerial bombing of cities and Strategic bombing during World War II because you put a non-neutral spin on the events, mixed with what appears to me to be original research. Without cites, you rewrote it so that Germany looked good and Britain looked bad. Per WP:NOR, I removed your contributions. Binksternet ( talk) 22:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Rawjapan ( talk) 19:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
You are of course right, it was Chamberlain who declared war on Germany and allied Britain to the Soviet Union. But it is known that this was the policy Churchill had been proposing, and pursued from day one of taking office in May 1940 by starting bombing of civilians in Germany.
Why don't you respond to the points I raised? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rawjapan ( talk • contribs)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Richard Werner, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 03:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi if you find any of your edits on Richard Werner are deleted, if you let me know, and i agree your edit is fine, i will help you get it reinstated. I am having particularly difficulties with certain editors who seem to think that modern banking practices are fringe.
By the way i managed to get the utube video of Richard into the fractional reserve banking page.
Cheers
Andrew Andrewedwardjudd ( talk) 07:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)andrewedwardjudd
Dear Andrew, Many thanks. Could you please get the previous version rawjapan instated? That would be very helpful indeed.
Many thanks and warm regards, rawajapn
Hello Rawjapan. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
It appears that you are either Richard Werner or closely associated with him, as this account is a single purpose account used to soapbox his supposed importance. Please do not continue pushing Richard Werner as doing so is a breach of our policies on conflict of interest LK ( talk) 07:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Your username and your editing patterns very strongly suggest that you are Richard A. Werner or his representative. As such, our policies and guidelines prohibit you from editing articles in such a way as to either promote him or his work. Additionally, you should not edit the Wikipedia article on Richard Werner. Relevant policies include: WP:PROMOTION, WP:COISELF, WP:AUTOBIO and WP:SELFCITE. LK ( talk) 04:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Credit theory of money may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rawjapan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Rawjapan. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rawjapan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
MrOllie (
talk)
04:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie ( talk) 00:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Rawjapan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
FeydHuxtable (
talk)
17:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Rawjapan, thanks very much for the good improvements you made to the Currency war article. Just as a minor point, as there are plans to promote Currency war to Good article status, if you add references to a TV appearance, could you ideally add the date and name of the program so the reference can be verified? Best wishes FeydHuxtable ( talk) 17:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I reverted your changes to Aerial bombing of cities and Strategic bombing during World War II because you put a non-neutral spin on the events, mixed with what appears to me to be original research. Without cites, you rewrote it so that Germany looked good and Britain looked bad. Per WP:NOR, I removed your contributions. Binksternet ( talk) 22:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
Rawjapan ( talk) 19:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
You are of course right, it was Chamberlain who declared war on Germany and allied Britain to the Soviet Union. But it is known that this was the policy Churchill had been proposing, and pursued from day one of taking office in May 1940 by starting bombing of civilians in Germany.
Why don't you respond to the points I raised? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rawjapan ( talk • contribs)
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about in the article
Richard Werner, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 03:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi if you find any of your edits on Richard Werner are deleted, if you let me know, and i agree your edit is fine, i will help you get it reinstated. I am having particularly difficulties with certain editors who seem to think that modern banking practices are fringe.
By the way i managed to get the utube video of Richard into the fractional reserve banking page.
Cheers
Andrew Andrewedwardjudd ( talk) 07:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)andrewedwardjudd
Dear Andrew, Many thanks. Could you please get the previous version rawjapan instated? That would be very helpful indeed.
Many thanks and warm regards, rawajapn
Hello Rawjapan. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
It appears that you are either Richard Werner or closely associated with him, as this account is a single purpose account used to soapbox his supposed importance. Please do not continue pushing Richard Werner as doing so is a breach of our policies on conflict of interest LK ( talk) 07:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Your username and your editing patterns very strongly suggest that you are Richard A. Werner or his representative. As such, our policies and guidelines prohibit you from editing articles in such a way as to either promote him or his work. Additionally, you should not edit the Wikipedia article on Richard Werner. Relevant policies include: WP:PROMOTION, WP:COISELF, WP:AUTOBIO and WP:SELFCITE. LK ( talk) 04:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Credit theory of money may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 15:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello Rawjapan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:Rawjapan. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rawjapan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
MrOllie (
talk)
04:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie ( talk) 00:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)