This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
you recently reviewed the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Delhi Public School Noida. you said that the school is not notable enough. I would like to inform that there already are articles for the same chain of schools like Delhi Public School, R. K. Puram and Delhi Public School, Mathura Road. This information may not be notable to the world, but where I live, it is the most prestigious institution for elementary education. The page may seem incomplete, but I can assure you, that if a page this small is created, it will provide a base for more information on the topic. And after a year or so, you will definitely have a reasonably big article. And by the way, I live in an extremely well developed Urban Area right next to the capital of India.
Hi Ramaksoud2000, I just wanted to let you know that I have granted the reviewer userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, please contact me and I will remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 03:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
I agree with a delete (for now) but, as explained at the AFD, the topic is credible and has plenty of available sources. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you so much for helping with my Melissa Tantaquidgeon Zobel page!!! DPWinslow ( talk) 01:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Ramaksoud2000, Since you were such great help to DPWinslow with the Melissa Tantaquidgeon Zobel page, I was hoping you might be able to help me with my article. I submitted my article on Trace DeMeyer, which was denied today by a user that appears to be pretty new to Wikipedia. Do you have any advice or suggestions on how to better my article so that it can be created? Thanks! Ame283 ( talk) 15:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, my recent page that I created for Leslie Gabriel has been flagged for deletion because I hadn't added my sources yet. I have since added my reliable sources but it's still telling me that the page is subject for deletion. Is there something that I am missing? How can I improve the page so that it doesn't get deleted? Washvb ( talk) 18:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Thanks
Ramaksoud2000 - regarding my article titled Peter Taliangis, I apologise as I had just copy and pasted from the Real Estate website for a description that I was to go back and edit later. I was writing an article that was not supposed to be (or read) like self promotion and as I am still learning the Wikipedia platform I had not yet worked out how to reference. I would like to post an article just stating who I am as a person not for promotional reason but for informative as I am a LinkedIn coach and am trying to establish and show people how to use a number of social media tools in terms of marketing and networking within an online community. It is a good tool to have along with Facebook and Twitter.
Regards
-- Taliangis.peter ( talk) 07:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
My name is Richard Lynn, general manager of WLNT radio. I recently removed articles from the wiki page for WLNT. This was erroneously marked as vandalism. The estates of two deceased persons mentioned in the articles, along with our board of directors have asked me to remove all information regarding WLNT. Also, we do not wish to have WLNT listed as a low power station, while we do carry the legacy -LP designator we operate with a TPO of127 watts; by definition, any station operating with more than 100 watts is a full power class d station and not a low power fm station. We have decided to no longer make unneeded information about the station public, as much of it is out of date. 96.38.96.128 ( talk) 06:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Greetings Ramaksoud2000, The following comment is in response to the information you extracted regarding WBFZ:
The information that you left on wikipedia is false and negative about a radio station which serves an expansive community. How you arbitrarily made the decision to delete updated information about the current status of WBFZ and allow something which is neither educational nor constructive to be left on wikipedia pages makes me question your motive. Can you please explain your decision to take off updated and accurate information which exposes the inaccuracy of a statement posed on wikipedia that is lebelous to WBFZ as a business entity which serves are large community? In fact, my question to you is why you did not delete an item that has no expressed purpose except to be destructive to WBFZ. It is unconscionable to allow information to stay on Wikipedia falsely about WBFZ when it is still operating and it is still owned by Imani Communications. So in your estimation you seem to think that it is positive to falsify the existing status of a station on Wikipedia by not updating records to reflect current status? Your action makes it appear like you are a collaborative part of sharing mis-information regarding WBFZ or you are unwittingly creating a cause of action of libel for the entity of WBFZ as exposed via wikipedia. In either case, your decision to remove the update was not founded upon sound reasoning. The problem is not with the addition to correct the falsification, the problem is with the inaccurate posting and motivation for same by the original poster in the first place. Given your response, it appears that you may not be aware that you are perpetuating a negative problem which has fiscal impact on a 50,000 watt radio station that broadcasts worldwide though Ipads, ipods, cell phones, computers etc. I encourage you to rethink your position on what constitutes negative. Furthermore, what qualification justifies your unilateral and arbitrary decision to delete this action. I await your response and reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WBFZ 105.3 ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ramaksoud2000,
I understand your concern at the existence of a previous article on the Anthology, in considering my article on Miscellanies. I was already aware of the Anthology article, and do refer to anthologies in my Miscellany article, in order to better explain the difference between them; but it is probably the case that I should state this difference in the article lead. Indeed, you are right that the basic definition of anthologies and miscellanies is very similar and might be confused. To avoid this I have briefly explained the historical and aesthetic differences between anthologies and miscellanies in the article lead, and of course backed this up with secondary sources. I have included an internal section link ( Succession of anthologies) to later in the article where I further discuss recent criticism arguing for the distinction between anthologies and miscellanies. I also direct attention to the section "Significance and recognition", where I quote Michael Suarez:
Not only are miscellanies considered different from anthologies, but there is a growing body of literary criticism attending to their importance. The study of eighteenth-century miscellanies is at a real turning-point, particularly with the anticipated launch of a free online database (The Digital Miscellanies Index) later this year. I think a separate miscellanies article is justified in terms of notability and distinctiveness of the subject, and it will be very useful to anyone wanting to know more about the unappreciated but phenomenal output of miscellanies in the eighteenth century (over 1000 were published in that century alone). I have tried to include a range of quite specific information about the growth and decline of miscellanies, and have repeatedly referred to how they were succeeded by anthologies. I have made changes to the article lead, therefore, to make it more clear why miscellanies are different from anthologies. I realise that this is crucial to the article now, and hope I have rectified the confusion. Can you let me know what you think and, also, since this is my first wikipedia article, how else I might improve my contributions?
Many thanks,
BridgenAJ ( talk) 10:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, most appreciated. BridgenAJ ( talk) 08:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For your nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Farrell (artist). Bearian ( talk) 17:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for reviewing the work-in-progress article, you suggested more sources, which parts need additional sourcing? We have magazine and newspaper sources as well as the grand opening of the Jack Kerouac museum for which Jesse did the permanent artwork. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deedrey ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that an editor, with the user name ENRYCH, has been blocked from editing because he added the information to Graeme Garden's page that Graeme is a patron of ENRYCH. I checked out the ENRYCH website and discovered that Graeme Garden is, in actual fact, a patron of ENRYCH and has been patron since 2010.
Because of what I discovered, I have reverted back to user ENRYCH's comment about this, on Graeme Garden's page, and have added a reference regarding it. Figaro ( talk) 12:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Listening should have my article not deleted cuz it's about some one i like plzz let it gi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.56.224.162 ( talk) 20:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
That does not matter, it will be deleted if its bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themacman4me ( talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Greetings: I am just seeking clarification on what I need to change in order for this article to be acceptable. Any guidance would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midnightraverblog ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
With my articles I made and/or be my wikipedia mentor :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JC12345 ( talk • contribs) 20:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
~~~~
and that produces your signature, which would be something like this:
Ramaksoud2000 (
Talk to me) 23:24, 1 May 2013 (UTC) . Also, your article looks like a good stub
stub. I'll be improving your articles with suggestions. Also, looking at your
edits. I see for this user,
User:ShaazHusainkhan, you mistook their
user page as their
user talk page. To communicate with other edits, leave a note on their talk page, not their user page. If you are interested in insects, see
Portal:Insects and
WP:WikiProject Insects. Also, be sure to look through the links I left you on your talk page. Anymore questions, just ask.
Ramaksoud2000 (
Talk to me)
23:24, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your warm welcome! <3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syrian only ( talk • contribs) 23:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Response TO Ramaksoud200 regarding Conscious Leadership • I authored this, and have NO knowledge of previous submissions for this term. I am a professor at Pepperdine University, and I assure you that the source "Conscious Capitalism" is not self published...it's from Harvard Business Press, is a Wallstreet Journal Bestseller, in currently in the top 3 of three Amazon business book lists and in the top 1100 of ALL Amazon book sales. My effort was to clear up the misunderstandings of the difference of CSR, Conscious Capitalism, Conscious Businesses, and Conscious Leadership. I thought if it's good enough for Stanford, Harvard, Wharton, and yes, Pepperdine, and a term being used by media such as NY Times, Forbes, and NPR, others might be interested, too. OBillyHill ( talk) 00:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Heya there, this is about the file request I made that you fulfilled a bit ago ( File:USAF Pararescueman PJ Colon-Lopez in Afghanistan in 2004.jpg) "Pararescueman" and "PJ" are synonymous, PJ is the acronym for Pararescuemen, would you be opposed to removing one or the other from the filename? :3 Thanks for the move, — - dain omite 05:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Can you believe it? I did a slight modification on the article text regarding Bear's consideration of joining the Indian Army. I was about to post an answer on the talk page re the edit request, when I got an edit conflict!. My first thought was "WTF?!" Not that I'm gripping, I just had to mention to you, the instigator of the EC, that it had happened! Happy editing. – S. Rich ( talk) 05:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Want to talk with you. Send friend request on Facebook by following this link: http://www.facebook.com/Dushason
Hope so, you send friend request. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dushason ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
You can't change old revisions of articles that still link to the old images; for example, had I deleted File:MPMK audio CD cover.jpg, this revision of Moondru Per Moondru Kadal would have its file link broken. Meanwhile, it's never appropriate to use G6 for purposes specifically excluded from other criteria, and the deletion of redirects created by pagemoves is specifically excluded by R3, recently created redirects. Nyttend ( talk) 02:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
I saw your removal of the A7 CSD I placed, I have added the {{under construction}} template to the page to avoid someone else tagging for CSD again. Feel free to remove the template when you are done -- Cameron11598 (Converse) 05:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
This change should not have been accepted, per MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon ( talk) 22:55, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey Ramaksoud2000; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 15:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with IOS version history. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 06:05, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
please help me improve my article ... i am really at a loss ... please help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brydenbusran ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
-> this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ioannis_Anastassakis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brydenbusran ( talk • contribs) 12:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
Just wanted to know why you want to delete the page: Jacob Allan? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeallan76 ( talk • contribs) 06:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, Just wondered why you took down my 'article being reviewed banner', which is a pretty standard thing that editors do when they want to review a page but need a bit of time to work through the material and check it. In your explanation you said that you set it to being reviewed over eight hours previously. I certainly didn't see the green banner there when I took this page on and certainly wouldn't have reverted your banner and placed my own there! I was rather looking forward to working on the page as I've previously reviewed a page by the architect who designed the building. I'd happily hand it over to you to review, nonetheless, but you don't appear to have a banner on it now, so do let me know if you plan to review it because, if not, I'd very much like to continue with the review as planned and place the under review banner back up there. Many thanks Libby norman ( talk) 07:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/April Fools'. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 16:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm new to trying to edit Wikipedia, so I apologize for any mistakes I may have previously made. I previously have been listed for several years as one of the students under the listing for Vilayat Inayat Khan. In my initial edit today, I tried to add two self-published books, but I now understand self-published books are not to be listed. I deleted these, as well as deleting a link to a website describing work stemming from Pir Vilayat's teachings. I corrected the previously listed title of my published book to include the full title, as well as adding the publisher and date of publication. I hope that these are acceptable edits to the original listing. I meant to add a signature to my edit, but I wasn't sure how to do this (e.g., where to insert Drdonw 23:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC)). Please let me know if I've gotten the edit correct this time. The book I include after my name has an extensive foreword by Pir Vilayat. Thank you. Drdonw 23:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdonw ( talk • contribs)
~~~~
. I suggest you stay away from the article about yourself to avoid any problems and discuss issues you find on the article on the talk page or with other editors. The edits you have described to me seem fine(removing your books and adding little details), however I'm unfamiliar with your article and you. It may be best to take it up with the editor you had a dispute with
here.
Ramaksoud2000 (
Talk to me)
17:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I decided it was more convenient to just reply here than at my talk. Anywho, thanks for letting me know. I'm glad you assumed good faith there. Thanks and while it is not a big deal, it is not a mistake I'll do again. Next time, I'll just ask the blocking admin to put the block tag on talkpage (sock or not, but no sock block). Thanks. World Traveller 101 21:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
World
Traveller
101 haz givn u
Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot
WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!
For assuming good faith towards me. We all mess up, but I mess up a ton. Well anyway, cheers! World Traveller 101 22:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{ subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.
What can I do to further improve the Vela Whisper - The Trial page? I am new to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Velawhisper ( talk • contribs) 19:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
? Do you get paid by Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaTreezz ( talk • contribs) 03:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Go away :) and I will leave you alone as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaTreezz ( talk • contribs) 04:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
I didn't create this account just for promotion, thought I could actually start editing wikipedia articles since I find so many that are complete useless when I do google searches. But thanks for being a complete idiot. The only warning I should be getting is for personal attacks against your stupidity. You pissed me off and now its gonna suck for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaTreezz ( talk • contribs) 04:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
i am agree with you, that assamese poem/articale sumit by me at my english wiki page is not rulls. pls. delete that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kandarpajit Kallol ( talk • contribs) 07:37, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! | |
Hi Ramaksoud2000/Archive 1, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{ subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! World Traveller 101 10:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC) |
Enjoy. World Traveller 101 10:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Rules for Fools. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — 2A02:EC80:101:0:0:0:2:8 ( talk) 00:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/No big deal?. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 01:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Ramaksoud2000, thanks for your intervention in the redirect of Ingrid Rossellini to Ingrid Bergman. It completely defeats the purpose of an encyclopedia but I am sure that this is not the first time anyone has insinuated that your intrusive style is more destructive than constructive. If we did this for other entries in the encyclopedia no one would create articles and we would have a series of interwoven links leading nowhere... But as in the case of an open encyclopedia anyone can contribute whether they are capable or not of adding anything to the conversation. Thanks again... Stevenmitchell ( talk) 02:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello - sorry, but I don't know how to respond directly on the sandbox page to your comments on my post about Carrie Spinney Grover, so I am writing them here. Would you be willing to suggest ideas as to how I could page this post conform to Wikipedia standards? I understand the issue is related to not being able to justify the importance of the person. My family has noted that: She wrote a book "Heritage of Songs" which has drawn interest from a large number of folk musicians over the past 60 years, and many of these songs have subsequently been recorded by them. A folk musician is currently writing a book about Mrs Grover's book (I wouldn't add this to the post until the book is published). She has recordings in the Library of Congress.
I thought that this would be a source of information for people who discover the book and/or her name credited in other recordings by more current musicians. My father and I are contacted occasionally by people who are interested in either recording some of the songs she passed on or by radio disk jockeys who ask permission to play the songs on the radio (most recent was a DJ who lived in Slovenia working for Radio Europe!).
Anyway, if that doesn't qualify I can accept it, I was just wondering if there was just a different approach I should be taking here.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forcarrie ( talk • contribs) 03:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
excuse me i like to ask .. i open a page for yourself . are this legaly ore not ?? you write me !!
Hello, I'm the editor of article Sota Fujimori. I'm sorry for creating short stub page that have no meanings. I guess AfD of Sota Fujimori is because of same kind of reason. However, I putted all the information and finished my project. It is already over 20000 bytes, and it have the most information among all BEMANI artists. Since it is my project for school Computer Technology class, can you call off the AfD of this page? Please watch this page again, and decide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15joonp ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, there is no David McMurray in the whole article. - There was a blue link for a David McMurray (who happens to play saxophone) in an article I worked on ( Faruq Z. Bey), and this leads to that... And I didn't see you coming ;) MenkinAlRire 01:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MenkinAlRire ( talk • contribs)
1.Thank you very much for renaming it!
2.I will have to bother you one more time; please rename it again due to the typo I had missed, i.e the missing h (see below); my bad , mea culpa, I apologise.
It should read Samothrace, Greece, wind turbines.jpg.
Thanx!
P.S. Don't bother renaming the link at my userpage; once you've renamed the image, I'll do it myself.
Thanatos|
talk
23:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for helping out the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jonathan Yip. This is the last step to a long, hard process. Your edits are greatly appreciated. Thanks. WorldTraveller101( Trouble?/ My Work) 00:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC) |
I replied on my talk page, but I am not sure if you will see it there. Sorry for the duplication. Regarding my external link on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparent_Data_Encryption
I believe that it constitutes valid information for SQL Server TDE users. However, if this is unaacceptable, please explain why the following third-party external links are acceptable:
Thanks. Neil Weicher ( talk) 19:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
One more third party link (which is also a dead link):
Neil Weicher ( talk) 13:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
"Explain to me how it is a conflict of interest if a free service is provided on a site?" -- User:Abdicate
Latest revision as of 05:45, 26 May 2013 (edit) (undo) Ramaksoud2000 (talk | contribs) (Redirects are there for a reason.)
I have deleted the article. However, I don't think it's appropriate to mark the article as a copyright violation; the Wikipedia license explicitly allows copying of the content, and any attribution issues could have been easily resolved by mentioning the source on the article talk page. (The criterion A10 fits this case better.) - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 06:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ramaksoud2000! Article has been restarted under that title. I understood what it was about, but then again I really should add a "This user understand [sic] a professional level of very bad English" infobox to my userpage. Pete aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 09:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
JackFrost2121(
Frostbitten?/
My Work) is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Hi. I am responding to you comment regarding the GigE Vision article. What I do not understand is why I am being called disruptive when it was not me but another user (Vswitchs) who recently inserted the paragraph in question into the article. After I removed some of his changes, he did not attempt to readd them, so there was no dispute there. Also if everybody has an equal right to edit articles, why my additions are getting deleted? For example, I added a remark that the AIA owns the standard (not just maintains it), but it was immediatelly removed by NorthBySouth. Finally, before contacting the Designated Agent, should I not try to resolve the dispute on the talk page? I do have some suggestion on how to handle this without removing the references to the products in question, but NorthBySouth does not seem to be interested in any discussion. Can I run some talking points with you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeslerB ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Are you satisfied with BentlyCoon’s reasoning? I thought we would try to come to a consensus, but I do not think he is interested in any discussion. It appears that he wants to keep the references to those products solely based on their controversial legal status which is the only thing that distinguishes them (or rather one of them, as 2 out of 3 are not real) from other GigE Vision products. I think I gave a compelling argument why neither these nor any other products should be advertised in such an article. And here is more. Take a look at the following articles dedicated to other video standards: Camera Link, CoaXPress, ONVIF, Serial digital interface. None of them include references to specific software products. Should not this alone be enough reason for removing that insertion?
TeslerB ( talk) 23:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
You can follow the steps at WP:DRN to "appeal". Point them to Talk:GigE vision, where I have left a note. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 05:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
WP:LINKVIO deals only with copyright and not any other legal aspects. For example, Wikipedia links to Silk Road (marketplace), even though the business is illegal, and Wikipedia links to The Pirate Bay, even though the Pirate Bay knowingly violates copyright (but Wikipedia doesn't link to any specific copyrighted works). Also, for an example about trademark. Marvel Comics registered the trademark "Superhero" back in the 60s, but Wikipedia has many articles and links that likely violate this trademark. Also, you may be interested to know that I uploaded the logo of GigE vision and used it in the article. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 21:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
you recently reviewed the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Delhi Public School Noida. you said that the school is not notable enough. I would like to inform that there already are articles for the same chain of schools like Delhi Public School, R. K. Puram and Delhi Public School, Mathura Road. This information may not be notable to the world, but where I live, it is the most prestigious institution for elementary education. The page may seem incomplete, but I can assure you, that if a page this small is created, it will provide a base for more information on the topic. And after a year or so, you will definitely have a reasonably big article. And by the way, I live in an extremely well developed Urban Area right next to the capital of India.
Hi Ramaksoud2000, I just wanted to let you know that I have granted the reviewer userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges. A full list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on will be at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, please contact me and I will remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 03:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
I agree with a delete (for now) but, as explained at the AFD, the topic is credible and has plenty of available sources. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thank you so much for helping with my Melissa Tantaquidgeon Zobel page!!! DPWinslow ( talk) 01:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Ramaksoud2000, Since you were such great help to DPWinslow with the Melissa Tantaquidgeon Zobel page, I was hoping you might be able to help me with my article. I submitted my article on Trace DeMeyer, which was denied today by a user that appears to be pretty new to Wikipedia. Do you have any advice or suggestions on how to better my article so that it can be created? Thanks! Ame283 ( talk) 15:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, my recent page that I created for Leslie Gabriel has been flagged for deletion because I hadn't added my sources yet. I have since added my reliable sources but it's still telling me that the page is subject for deletion. Is there something that I am missing? How can I improve the page so that it doesn't get deleted? Washvb ( talk) 18:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Thanks
Ramaksoud2000 - regarding my article titled Peter Taliangis, I apologise as I had just copy and pasted from the Real Estate website for a description that I was to go back and edit later. I was writing an article that was not supposed to be (or read) like self promotion and as I am still learning the Wikipedia platform I had not yet worked out how to reference. I would like to post an article just stating who I am as a person not for promotional reason but for informative as I am a LinkedIn coach and am trying to establish and show people how to use a number of social media tools in terms of marketing and networking within an online community. It is a good tool to have along with Facebook and Twitter.
Regards
-- Taliangis.peter ( talk) 07:13, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
My name is Richard Lynn, general manager of WLNT radio. I recently removed articles from the wiki page for WLNT. This was erroneously marked as vandalism. The estates of two deceased persons mentioned in the articles, along with our board of directors have asked me to remove all information regarding WLNT. Also, we do not wish to have WLNT listed as a low power station, while we do carry the legacy -LP designator we operate with a TPO of127 watts; by definition, any station operating with more than 100 watts is a full power class d station and not a low power fm station. We have decided to no longer make unneeded information about the station public, as much of it is out of date. 96.38.96.128 ( talk) 06:09, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Greetings Ramaksoud2000, The following comment is in response to the information you extracted regarding WBFZ:
The information that you left on wikipedia is false and negative about a radio station which serves an expansive community. How you arbitrarily made the decision to delete updated information about the current status of WBFZ and allow something which is neither educational nor constructive to be left on wikipedia pages makes me question your motive. Can you please explain your decision to take off updated and accurate information which exposes the inaccuracy of a statement posed on wikipedia that is lebelous to WBFZ as a business entity which serves are large community? In fact, my question to you is why you did not delete an item that has no expressed purpose except to be destructive to WBFZ. It is unconscionable to allow information to stay on Wikipedia falsely about WBFZ when it is still operating and it is still owned by Imani Communications. So in your estimation you seem to think that it is positive to falsify the existing status of a station on Wikipedia by not updating records to reflect current status? Your action makes it appear like you are a collaborative part of sharing mis-information regarding WBFZ or you are unwittingly creating a cause of action of libel for the entity of WBFZ as exposed via wikipedia. In either case, your decision to remove the update was not founded upon sound reasoning. The problem is not with the addition to correct the falsification, the problem is with the inaccurate posting and motivation for same by the original poster in the first place. Given your response, it appears that you may not be aware that you are perpetuating a negative problem which has fiscal impact on a 50,000 watt radio station that broadcasts worldwide though Ipads, ipods, cell phones, computers etc. I encourage you to rethink your position on what constitutes negative. Furthermore, what qualification justifies your unilateral and arbitrary decision to delete this action. I await your response and reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WBFZ 105.3 ( talk • contribs) 18:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ramaksoud2000,
I understand your concern at the existence of a previous article on the Anthology, in considering my article on Miscellanies. I was already aware of the Anthology article, and do refer to anthologies in my Miscellany article, in order to better explain the difference between them; but it is probably the case that I should state this difference in the article lead. Indeed, you are right that the basic definition of anthologies and miscellanies is very similar and might be confused. To avoid this I have briefly explained the historical and aesthetic differences between anthologies and miscellanies in the article lead, and of course backed this up with secondary sources. I have included an internal section link ( Succession of anthologies) to later in the article where I further discuss recent criticism arguing for the distinction between anthologies and miscellanies. I also direct attention to the section "Significance and recognition", where I quote Michael Suarez:
Not only are miscellanies considered different from anthologies, but there is a growing body of literary criticism attending to their importance. The study of eighteenth-century miscellanies is at a real turning-point, particularly with the anticipated launch of a free online database (The Digital Miscellanies Index) later this year. I think a separate miscellanies article is justified in terms of notability and distinctiveness of the subject, and it will be very useful to anyone wanting to know more about the unappreciated but phenomenal output of miscellanies in the eighteenth century (over 1000 were published in that century alone). I have tried to include a range of quite specific information about the growth and decline of miscellanies, and have repeatedly referred to how they were succeeded by anthologies. I have made changes to the article lead, therefore, to make it more clear why miscellanies are different from anthologies. I realise that this is crucial to the article now, and hope I have rectified the confusion. Can you let me know what you think and, also, since this is my first wikipedia article, how else I might improve my contributions?
Many thanks,
BridgenAJ ( talk) 10:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you, most appreciated. BridgenAJ ( talk) 08:33, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For your nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Farrell (artist). Bearian ( talk) 17:18, 23 April 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for reviewing the work-in-progress article, you suggested more sources, which parts need additional sourcing? We have magazine and newspaper sources as well as the grand opening of the Jack Kerouac museum for which Jesse did the permanent artwork. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deedrey ( talk • contribs) 17:42, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I noticed that an editor, with the user name ENRYCH, has been blocked from editing because he added the information to Graeme Garden's page that Graeme is a patron of ENRYCH. I checked out the ENRYCH website and discovered that Graeme Garden is, in actual fact, a patron of ENRYCH and has been patron since 2010.
Because of what I discovered, I have reverted back to user ENRYCH's comment about this, on Graeme Garden's page, and have added a reference regarding it. Figaro ( talk) 12:21, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Listening should have my article not deleted cuz it's about some one i like plzz let it gi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.56.224.162 ( talk) 20:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
That does not matter, it will be deleted if its bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themacman4me ( talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Greetings: I am just seeking clarification on what I need to change in order for this article to be acceptable. Any guidance would be appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midnightraverblog ( talk • contribs) 01:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
With my articles I made and/or be my wikipedia mentor :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by JC12345 ( talk • contribs) 20:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
~~~~
and that produces your signature, which would be something like this:
Ramaksoud2000 (
Talk to me) 23:24, 1 May 2013 (UTC) . Also, your article looks like a good stub
stub. I'll be improving your articles with suggestions. Also, looking at your
edits. I see for this user,
User:ShaazHusainkhan, you mistook their
user page as their
user talk page. To communicate with other edits, leave a note on their talk page, not their user page. If you are interested in insects, see
Portal:Insects and
WP:WikiProject Insects. Also, be sure to look through the links I left you on your talk page. Anymore questions, just ask.
Ramaksoud2000 (
Talk to me)
23:24, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your warm welcome! <3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syrian only ( talk • contribs) 23:33, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Response TO Ramaksoud200 regarding Conscious Leadership • I authored this, and have NO knowledge of previous submissions for this term. I am a professor at Pepperdine University, and I assure you that the source "Conscious Capitalism" is not self published...it's from Harvard Business Press, is a Wallstreet Journal Bestseller, in currently in the top 3 of three Amazon business book lists and in the top 1100 of ALL Amazon book sales. My effort was to clear up the misunderstandings of the difference of CSR, Conscious Capitalism, Conscious Businesses, and Conscious Leadership. I thought if it's good enough for Stanford, Harvard, Wharton, and yes, Pepperdine, and a term being used by media such as NY Times, Forbes, and NPR, others might be interested, too. OBillyHill ( talk) 00:04, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Heya there, this is about the file request I made that you fulfilled a bit ago ( File:USAF Pararescueman PJ Colon-Lopez in Afghanistan in 2004.jpg) "Pararescueman" and "PJ" are synonymous, PJ is the acronym for Pararescuemen, would you be opposed to removing one or the other from the filename? :3 Thanks for the move, — - dain omite 05:07, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Can you believe it? I did a slight modification on the article text regarding Bear's consideration of joining the Indian Army. I was about to post an answer on the talk page re the edit request, when I got an edit conflict!. My first thought was "WTF?!" Not that I'm gripping, I just had to mention to you, the instigator of the EC, that it had happened! Happy editing. – S. Rich ( talk) 05:44, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! Want to talk with you. Send friend request on Facebook by following this link: http://www.facebook.com/Dushason
Hope so, you send friend request. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dushason ( talk • contribs) 16:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
You can't change old revisions of articles that still link to the old images; for example, had I deleted File:MPMK audio CD cover.jpg, this revision of Moondru Per Moondru Kadal would have its file link broken. Meanwhile, it's never appropriate to use G6 for purposes specifically excluded from other criteria, and the deletion of redirects created by pagemoves is specifically excluded by R3, recently created redirects. Nyttend ( talk) 02:42, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
I saw your removal of the A7 CSD I placed, I have added the {{under construction}} template to the page to avoid someone else tagging for CSD again. Feel free to remove the template when you are done -- Cameron11598 (Converse) 05:54, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
This change should not have been accepted, per MOS:CAPS. Dicklyon ( talk) 22:55, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Hey Ramaksoud2000; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 15:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with IOS version history. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot t • c » 06:05, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
please help me improve my article ... i am really at a loss ... please help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brydenbusran ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
-> this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ioannis_Anastassakis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brydenbusran ( talk • contribs) 12:36, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
Just wanted to know why you want to delete the page: Jacob Allan? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakeallan76 ( talk • contribs) 06:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, Just wondered why you took down my 'article being reviewed banner', which is a pretty standard thing that editors do when they want to review a page but need a bit of time to work through the material and check it. In your explanation you said that you set it to being reviewed over eight hours previously. I certainly didn't see the green banner there when I took this page on and certainly wouldn't have reverted your banner and placed my own there! I was rather looking forward to working on the page as I've previously reviewed a page by the architect who designed the building. I'd happily hand it over to you to review, nonetheless, but you don't appear to have a banner on it now, so do let me know if you plan to review it because, if not, I'd very much like to continue with the review as planned and place the under review banner back up there. Many thanks Libby norman ( talk) 07:56, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/April Fools'. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 16:20, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
I'm new to trying to edit Wikipedia, so I apologize for any mistakes I may have previously made. I previously have been listed for several years as one of the students under the listing for Vilayat Inayat Khan. In my initial edit today, I tried to add two self-published books, but I now understand self-published books are not to be listed. I deleted these, as well as deleting a link to a website describing work stemming from Pir Vilayat's teachings. I corrected the previously listed title of my published book to include the full title, as well as adding the publisher and date of publication. I hope that these are acceptable edits to the original listing. I meant to add a signature to my edit, but I wasn't sure how to do this (e.g., where to insert Drdonw 23:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC)). Please let me know if I've gotten the edit correct this time. The book I include after my name has an extensive foreword by Pir Vilayat. Thank you. Drdonw 23:33, 9 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdonw ( talk • contribs)
~~~~
. I suggest you stay away from the article about yourself to avoid any problems and discuss issues you find on the article on the talk page or with other editors. The edits you have described to me seem fine(removing your books and adding little details), however I'm unfamiliar with your article and you. It may be best to take it up with the editor you had a dispute with
here.
Ramaksoud2000 (
Talk to me)
17:11, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
I decided it was more convenient to just reply here than at my talk. Anywho, thanks for letting me know. I'm glad you assumed good faith there. Thanks and while it is not a big deal, it is not a mistake I'll do again. Next time, I'll just ask the blocking admin to put the block tag on talkpage (sock or not, but no sock block). Thanks. World Traveller 101 21:58, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
World
Traveller
101 haz givn u
Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot
WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!
For assuming good faith towards me. We all mess up, but I mess up a ton. Well anyway, cheers! World Traveller 101 22:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{ subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk paj with friendly messuj to all.
What can I do to further improve the Vela Whisper - The Trial page? I am new to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Velawhisper ( talk • contribs) 19:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
? Do you get paid by Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaTreezz ( talk • contribs) 03:57, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Go away :) and I will leave you alone as well — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaTreezz ( talk • contribs) 04:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
I didn't create this account just for promotion, thought I could actually start editing wikipedia articles since I find so many that are complete useless when I do google searches. But thanks for being a complete idiot. The only warning I should be getting is for personal attacks against your stupidity. You pissed me off and now its gonna suck for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoshuaTreezz ( talk • contribs) 04:40, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
i am agree with you, that assamese poem/articale sumit by me at my english wiki page is not rulls. pls. delete that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kandarpajit Kallol ( talk • contribs) 07:37, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Here's a plate full of cookies to share! | |
Hi Ramaksoud2000/Archive 1, here are some delicious cookies to help brighten your day! However, there are too many cookies here for one person to eat all at once, so please share these cookies with at least two other editors by copying {{ subst:Sharethecookies}} to their talk pages. Enjoy! World Traveller 101 10:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC) |
Enjoy. World Traveller 101 10:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Rules for Fools. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — 2A02:EC80:101:0:0:0:2:8 ( talk) 00:54, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/No big deal?. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot ( talk) 01:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Ramaksoud2000, thanks for your intervention in the redirect of Ingrid Rossellini to Ingrid Bergman. It completely defeats the purpose of an encyclopedia but I am sure that this is not the first time anyone has insinuated that your intrusive style is more destructive than constructive. If we did this for other entries in the encyclopedia no one would create articles and we would have a series of interwoven links leading nowhere... But as in the case of an open encyclopedia anyone can contribute whether they are capable or not of adding anything to the conversation. Thanks again... Stevenmitchell ( talk) 02:30, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello - sorry, but I don't know how to respond directly on the sandbox page to your comments on my post about Carrie Spinney Grover, so I am writing them here. Would you be willing to suggest ideas as to how I could page this post conform to Wikipedia standards? I understand the issue is related to not being able to justify the importance of the person. My family has noted that: She wrote a book "Heritage of Songs" which has drawn interest from a large number of folk musicians over the past 60 years, and many of these songs have subsequently been recorded by them. A folk musician is currently writing a book about Mrs Grover's book (I wouldn't add this to the post until the book is published). She has recordings in the Library of Congress.
I thought that this would be a source of information for people who discover the book and/or her name credited in other recordings by more current musicians. My father and I are contacted occasionally by people who are interested in either recording some of the songs she passed on or by radio disk jockeys who ask permission to play the songs on the radio (most recent was a DJ who lived in Slovenia working for Radio Europe!).
Anyway, if that doesn't qualify I can accept it, I was just wondering if there was just a different approach I should be taking here.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forcarrie ( talk • contribs) 03:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
excuse me i like to ask .. i open a page for yourself . are this legaly ore not ?? you write me !!
Hello, I'm the editor of article Sota Fujimori. I'm sorry for creating short stub page that have no meanings. I guess AfD of Sota Fujimori is because of same kind of reason. However, I putted all the information and finished my project. It is already over 20000 bytes, and it have the most information among all BEMANI artists. Since it is my project for school Computer Technology class, can you call off the AfD of this page? Please watch this page again, and decide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15joonp ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi, there is no David McMurray in the whole article. - There was a blue link for a David McMurray (who happens to play saxophone) in an article I worked on ( Faruq Z. Bey), and this leads to that... And I didn't see you coming ;) MenkinAlRire 01:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MenkinAlRire ( talk • contribs)
1.Thank you very much for renaming it!
2.I will have to bother you one more time; please rename it again due to the typo I had missed, i.e the missing h (see below); my bad , mea culpa, I apologise.
It should read Samothrace, Greece, wind turbines.jpg.
Thanx!
P.S. Don't bother renaming the link at my userpage; once you've renamed the image, I'll do it myself.
Thanatos|
talk
23:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for helping out the Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jonathan Yip. This is the last step to a long, hard process. Your edits are greatly appreciated. Thanks. WorldTraveller101( Trouble?/ My Work) 00:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC) |
I replied on my talk page, but I am not sure if you will see it there. Sorry for the duplication. Regarding my external link on: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparent_Data_Encryption
I believe that it constitutes valid information for SQL Server TDE users. However, if this is unaacceptable, please explain why the following third-party external links are acceptable:
Thanks. Neil Weicher ( talk) 19:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
One more third party link (which is also a dead link):
Neil Weicher ( talk) 13:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
"Explain to me how it is a conflict of interest if a free service is provided on a site?" -- User:Abdicate
Latest revision as of 05:45, 26 May 2013 (edit) (undo) Ramaksoud2000 (talk | contribs) (Redirects are there for a reason.)
I have deleted the article. However, I don't think it's appropriate to mark the article as a copyright violation; the Wikipedia license explicitly allows copying of the content, and any attribution issues could have been easily resolved by mentioning the source on the article talk page. (The criterion A10 fits this case better.) - Mike Rosoft ( talk) 06:44, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi Ramaksoud2000! Article has been restarted under that title. I understood what it was about, but then again I really should add a "This user understand [sic] a professional level of very bad English" infobox to my userpage. Pete aka -- Shirt58 ( talk) 09:10, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
JackFrost2121(
Frostbitten?/
My Work) is wishing you a Happy
Memorial Day! On this day, we recognize our fellow countrymen who have fought our nation's battles for the past several hundred years, protecting our freedom and safety. We remember those who paid the ultimate price and we support those who continue to willingly sacrifice their safety for the sake of their country. Happy Memorial Day!
Share this message by adding {{ subst:Memorial Day}} to a fellow American's talk page.
Hi. I am responding to you comment regarding the GigE Vision article. What I do not understand is why I am being called disruptive when it was not me but another user (Vswitchs) who recently inserted the paragraph in question into the article. After I removed some of his changes, he did not attempt to readd them, so there was no dispute there. Also if everybody has an equal right to edit articles, why my additions are getting deleted? For example, I added a remark that the AIA owns the standard (not just maintains it), but it was immediatelly removed by NorthBySouth. Finally, before contacting the Designated Agent, should I not try to resolve the dispute on the talk page? I do have some suggestion on how to handle this without removing the references to the products in question, but NorthBySouth does not seem to be interested in any discussion. Can I run some talking points with you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeslerB ( talk • contribs) 03:45, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Are you satisfied with BentlyCoon’s reasoning? I thought we would try to come to a consensus, but I do not think he is interested in any discussion. It appears that he wants to keep the references to those products solely based on their controversial legal status which is the only thing that distinguishes them (or rather one of them, as 2 out of 3 are not real) from other GigE Vision products. I think I gave a compelling argument why neither these nor any other products should be advertised in such an article. And here is more. Take a look at the following articles dedicated to other video standards: Camera Link, CoaXPress, ONVIF, Serial digital interface. None of them include references to specific software products. Should not this alone be enough reason for removing that insertion?
TeslerB ( talk) 23:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
You can follow the steps at WP:DRN to "appeal". Point them to Talk:GigE vision, where I have left a note. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 05:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
WP:LINKVIO deals only with copyright and not any other legal aspects. For example, Wikipedia links to Silk Road (marketplace), even though the business is illegal, and Wikipedia links to The Pirate Bay, even though the Pirate Bay knowingly violates copyright (but Wikipedia doesn't link to any specific copyrighted works). Also, for an example about trademark. Marvel Comics registered the trademark "Superhero" back in the 60s, but Wikipedia has many articles and links that likely violate this trademark. Also, you may be interested to know that I uploaded the logo of GigE vision and used it in the article. Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 21:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)