![]() |
Hi Rajuditchopra!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
![]() |
Hello! Rajuditchopra,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Onel5969
TT me
18:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajitabh Bose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajitabh Bose until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia.
SwisterTwister
talk
06:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jimfbleak -
talk to me?
06:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pocket Love Story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pocket Love Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the bottom of this page, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "
JamesBWatson" (
talk)
10:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajuditchopra, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
![]() |
Hi Rajuditchopra!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
![]() |
Hello! Rajuditchopra,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Onel5969
TT me
18:57, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
|
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajitabh Bose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajitabh Bose until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia.
SwisterTwister
talk
06:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jimfbleak -
talk to me?
06:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pocket Love Story is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pocket Love Story until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone ( talk) 13:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the bottom of this page, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "
JamesBWatson" (
talk)
10:07, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajuditchopra, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.