Hello Raftermast!
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ10:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Your edit summary
diffrv vandalism is clearly out in left field. The edits you removed may be considered unacceptable as either original research or as drawing conclusions from the posted material, or possibly as
WP:NPOV; but it is clearly NOT
vandalism. Please be more careful with your usage of the edit summary. Thank you
Dbiel(
Talk)01:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)reply
There is no reason to post any warning related to a post made over two years ago.
You failed to sign your post
A level 3 warning for this type of edit is excessive, a level 1 warning is far more appropriate. I have removed the warnings you posted a added back a level 1 warning.
Nope. Looking back at your edits, it's pretty clear it's an attempt at misinformation/"sneaky" vandalism; the last edit you made on the page makes it pretty obvious what you were trying to do.
Re the edit made by 128.30.29.236 - you're certainly right there though; I didn't spot the date this IP address made the edit in question, so would agree the warning was waaaaaaaaay to late to be of any use! wrt not signing, that's my mistake; I thought the template did this automatically. IMHO, it's pretty odd that it doesn't...
Raftermast (
talk)
19:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)reply
I guess you miss understood my post somewhat. First, the edits were not mine. It is a bit hard to tell if it was sneaky vandalism or a good faith edit in left field; but that really does not matter. The key point here is that the series of 5 edits in this single article were the only recent edits by this IP address and no warning was posted until 2 hours after the last edit, and you had to create the talk page to post the warning; a level one warning should have been used, not a level 3 warning. Don't forget
WP:NOBITEDbiel(
Talk)21:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Granted you are also a new user, but we generally treat those who post warnings as being a bit more experienced. I regret if the tone of my original post was a bit too harsh. Looking forward to you being a valuable contributor to Wikipedia.
Dbiel(
Talk)21:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello Raftermast!
Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for
your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —
Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ10:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)reply
Your edit summary
diffrv vandalism is clearly out in left field. The edits you removed may be considered unacceptable as either original research or as drawing conclusions from the posted material, or possibly as
WP:NPOV; but it is clearly NOT
vandalism. Please be more careful with your usage of the edit summary. Thank you
Dbiel(
Talk)01:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)reply
There is no reason to post any warning related to a post made over two years ago.
You failed to sign your post
A level 3 warning for this type of edit is excessive, a level 1 warning is far more appropriate. I have removed the warnings you posted a added back a level 1 warning.
Nope. Looking back at your edits, it's pretty clear it's an attempt at misinformation/"sneaky" vandalism; the last edit you made on the page makes it pretty obvious what you were trying to do.
Re the edit made by 128.30.29.236 - you're certainly right there though; I didn't spot the date this IP address made the edit in question, so would agree the warning was waaaaaaaaay to late to be of any use! wrt not signing, that's my mistake; I thought the template did this automatically. IMHO, it's pretty odd that it doesn't...
Raftermast (
talk)
19:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)reply
I guess you miss understood my post somewhat. First, the edits were not mine. It is a bit hard to tell if it was sneaky vandalism or a good faith edit in left field; but that really does not matter. The key point here is that the series of 5 edits in this single article were the only recent edits by this IP address and no warning was posted until 2 hours after the last edit, and you had to create the talk page to post the warning; a level one warning should have been used, not a level 3 warning. Don't forget
WP:NOBITEDbiel(
Talk)21:05, 23 January 2009 (UTC)reply
Granted you are also a new user, but we generally treat those who post warnings as being a bit more experienced. I regret if the tone of my original post was a bit too harsh. Looking forward to you being a valuable contributor to Wikipedia.
Dbiel(
Talk)21:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)reply