Hello, RafaelJC12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Romani people did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Govindaharihari ( talk) 02:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —
SamX [
talk ·
contribs 21:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Sophie Labelle. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beccaynr ( talk) 21:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. –
bradv 21:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
RafaelJC12 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The admins of Sophie Labelle's page are just censoring any mention of Labelle's fetish art. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/02/21/trans-cartoonist-diaper-fetish-art-kink-invited-speak-children/ https://www.heraldscotland.com/life_style/arts_ents/23342004.row-trans-nappy-cartoonist-asked-speak-library/#comments-anchor RafaelJC12 ( talk) 22:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked for violating the Biographies of Living Persons policy, but you seem to think that your comments(that even I as an admin cannot see) were proper, so there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 23:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RafaelJC12 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I've been blocked after making this edit on Sophie Labelle page, which was censored by the admins without proper justification. In fact, the admins of Sophie Labelle's page have repeatedly censored any mentioned of Labelle's fetish material, such as this one. RafaelJC12 ( talk) 22:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not a reason to unblock you. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, RafaelJC12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Romani people did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Govindaharihari ( talk) 02:53, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
Please stop adding unreferenced or
poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as
defamatory and is in violation of
Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. —
SamX [
talk ·
contribs 21:28, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Sophie Labelle. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beccaynr ( talk) 21:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. –
bradv 21:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
RafaelJC12 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The admins of Sophie Labelle's page are just censoring any mention of Labelle's fetish art. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/02/21/trans-cartoonist-diaper-fetish-art-kink-invited-speak-children/ https://www.heraldscotland.com/life_style/arts_ents/23342004.row-trans-nappy-cartoonist-asked-speak-library/#comments-anchor RafaelJC12 ( talk) 22:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked for violating the Biographies of Living Persons policy, but you seem to think that your comments(that even I as an admin cannot see) were proper, so there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 23:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RafaelJC12 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I've been blocked after making this edit on Sophie Labelle page, which was censored by the admins without proper justification. In fact, the admins of Sophie Labelle's page have repeatedly censored any mentioned of Labelle's fetish material, such as this one. RafaelJC12 ( talk) 22:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is not a reason to unblock you. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.