It's good to work with you on the EJ Wells and Samantha Brady article. However, I must point out that the reason I take out mention of fans being treated to the storyline, and other mentions that go too much into how popular the couple is...is because Wikipedia requires that Wikipedia articles have neutrality. And also, when discussing the storyline, it's more so to focus on the plot, not fan reactions.
I made a mistake in part of the editing that you reversed, but I'll fix that now. See you on the editing side. Flyer22 16:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:EJami.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:EJami.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 18:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
How do you put a comment after your edit like in your last one you put "removed fan reaction to keep neutrality". How do you do that Antigone28 17:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
When you edit, there is an "edit summary" box below the edit box where you can put your comment. :)
Radiantbutterfly
17:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to add a Cultural Impact section, in which the controversy will be integrated into. Also, the Fan reaction part can be added into this section, if you want to add it back.
What I'm going for with the EJ and Sami article is something similar to the J.R. and Babe article (in which I created), which was cited by two well-respected, experienced Wikipedian editors as the best a soap couple article can be on Wikipedia. Another similar article to J.R. and Babe's article format is the Zach Slater and Kendall Hart article. I fixed that article up. Your article is going to need more formatting, just like most other soap opera couple articles here at Wikipedia do at this moment until they are fixed up. Also, the two sections about character details that you have within the EJ and Sami article isn't needed. I'm not certain when I'll begin to overhaul the EJ Wells and Samantha Brady article, but leave primary wording you have within the article, of course, but I wanted to inform you of this first. Flyer22 18:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
And, oh, for the record, J.R. and Babe were hit with controversy, but that's explained in their Cultural impact section, as well as in their Popularity section, though I would say that E.J. and Sami are more controversial. Flyer22 19:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
hello radiantbutterfly I just wanted to tell you that I love your EJ Wells and Samantha Brady page and that if you ever need any help editing it or fixing it, I'd be more than grateful to help you. Greetings and salutations form a fellow EJami fan. Perfecttlovee 8:20 June 30 2007.
I love the way that you debate, Radiantbutterfly. To see most of the editors debate in a level-headed way within a deletion debate, without throwing out condescending remarks, or getting too riled up in anger just makes me all the more appreciative of debaters like you, especially since I recently have not seen that with another deletion debate I was in.
Anyway, it's apparent that the EJ Wells and Samantha Brady article will be judged a keep. Good debating. Flyer22 23:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:SantoDiMeraPic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
If you haven't read up on that yet, more can be read with this link. I was opposed to it at first as well, but now it seems really right to me, perhaps because I'm used to it now. But having the plot in present tense, with the year in which it happened if it's a soap opera (though years are not usually needed for present tense of film plot summaries), as to clarify that it's not happening now makes a lot of sense, considering that just as if watching a movie, a television show, or a play, it really does seem as though it's happening as you read. I know that you don't like it yet, but you might get used to it as I did. Flyer22 23:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:BradyDimeraPromo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
It's good to work with you on the EJ Wells and Samantha Brady article. However, I must point out that the reason I take out mention of fans being treated to the storyline, and other mentions that go too much into how popular the couple is...is because Wikipedia requires that Wikipedia articles have neutrality. And also, when discussing the storyline, it's more so to focus on the plot, not fan reactions.
I made a mistake in part of the editing that you reversed, but I'll fix that now. See you on the editing side. Flyer22 16:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:EJami.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 18:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading Image:EJami.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Yamla 18:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
How do you put a comment after your edit like in your last one you put "removed fan reaction to keep neutrality". How do you do that Antigone28 17:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
When you edit, there is an "edit summary" box below the edit box where you can put your comment. :)
Radiantbutterfly
17:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm going to add a Cultural Impact section, in which the controversy will be integrated into. Also, the Fan reaction part can be added into this section, if you want to add it back.
What I'm going for with the EJ and Sami article is something similar to the J.R. and Babe article (in which I created), which was cited by two well-respected, experienced Wikipedian editors as the best a soap couple article can be on Wikipedia. Another similar article to J.R. and Babe's article format is the Zach Slater and Kendall Hart article. I fixed that article up. Your article is going to need more formatting, just like most other soap opera couple articles here at Wikipedia do at this moment until they are fixed up. Also, the two sections about character details that you have within the EJ and Sami article isn't needed. I'm not certain when I'll begin to overhaul the EJ Wells and Samantha Brady article, but leave primary wording you have within the article, of course, but I wanted to inform you of this first. Flyer22 18:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
And, oh, for the record, J.R. and Babe were hit with controversy, but that's explained in their Cultural impact section, as well as in their Popularity section, though I would say that E.J. and Sami are more controversial. Flyer22 19:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
hello radiantbutterfly I just wanted to tell you that I love your EJ Wells and Samantha Brady page and that if you ever need any help editing it or fixing it, I'd be more than grateful to help you. Greetings and salutations form a fellow EJami fan. Perfecttlovee 8:20 June 30 2007.
I love the way that you debate, Radiantbutterfly. To see most of the editors debate in a level-headed way within a deletion debate, without throwing out condescending remarks, or getting too riled up in anger just makes me all the more appreciative of debaters like you, especially since I recently have not seen that with another deletion debate I was in.
Anyway, it's apparent that the EJ Wells and Samantha Brady article will be judged a keep. Good debating. Flyer22 23:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:SantoDiMeraPic.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
If you haven't read up on that yet, more can be read with this link. I was opposed to it at first as well, but now it seems really right to me, perhaps because I'm used to it now. But having the plot in present tense, with the year in which it happened if it's a soap opera (though years are not usually needed for present tense of film plot summaries), as to clarify that it's not happening now makes a lot of sense, considering that just as if watching a movie, a television show, or a play, it really does seem as though it's happening as you read. I know that you don't like it yet, but you might get used to it as I did. Flyer22 23:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:BradyDimeraPromo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:50, 18 May 2009 (UTC)