Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia.
I noticed that you have been removing large sections of the Jack Warner article. Can you please explain why?--
Jahalive (
talk) 20:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
You have been repeatedly removing sections of the
Jack Warner (football executive) article. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. It is called
edit warring and is not allowed on Wikipedia. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
- If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Please discuss the changes you would like to make on the article's talk page. Thanks.-- Jahalive ( talk) 20:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Jack Warner (football executive), you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
QuiteUnusual
TalkQu 09:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dewritech. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Jack Warner (football executive) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Dewritech (
talk) 12:29, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Gogo Dodo (
talk) 16:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |
Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia.
I noticed that you have been removing large sections of the Jack Warner article. Can you please explain why?--
Jahalive (
talk) 20:18, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- You have been repeatedly removing sections of the
Jack Warner (football executive) article. Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. It is called
edit warring and is not allowed on Wikipedia. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
- If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Please discuss the changes you would like to make on the article's talk page. Thanks.-- Jahalive ( talk) 20:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Jack Warner (football executive), you may be
blocked from editing. Thank you.
QuiteUnusual
TalkQu 09:51, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Dewritech. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Jack Warner (football executive) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Dewritech (
talk) 12:29, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Gogo Dodo (
talk) 16:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC) |