|
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
22:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
76.66.202.219 ( talk) 11:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
The only "complaints" I know of are questions on the article's talk page from people who were clearly confused and whose understanding was deficient. Why don't you go to the talk page an state in details what you find objectionable in the informal description and what you don't understand in it? Michael Hardy ( talk) 18:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
I am a mathematician and I know what a vector space is. John Baez is a mathematical physicist who is highly respected by mathematicians as an expository writer on abstruse concepts and quite prolific in his writing on such things. In this blog posting you see him saying
I don't think that your understanding of the matter is superior to mine or to his. Michael Hardy ( talk) 20:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Can you tell me whether I am right or wrong in my surmise that your position on this question of affine spaces comes down to this?:
As you may or may not have noticed, I publicly guessed that that is what you have in mind in this section. Michael Hardy ( talk) 23:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
The article Gravitationally aligned orbits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Summary of a theory presented in a research paper. Google scholar shows about 20 citations, 1/3rd are self citations, rest of them mention other ideas presented in the paper but not the subject of this article. So, fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
UbedJunejo (
talk•
cont)
19:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spiral galaxy dynamics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiral galaxy dynamics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.-- UbedJunejo ( talk• cont) 19:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi RQG!
FYI, the resource Spiral galaxy dynamics can be imported to Wikiversity before it's deleted here and would be welcome. -- Marshallsumter ( talk) 17:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
|
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
22:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
76.66.202.219 ( talk) 11:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
The only "complaints" I know of are questions on the article's talk page from people who were clearly confused and whose understanding was deficient. Why don't you go to the talk page an state in details what you find objectionable in the informal description and what you don't understand in it? Michael Hardy ( talk) 18:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
I am a mathematician and I know what a vector space is. John Baez is a mathematical physicist who is highly respected by mathematicians as an expository writer on abstruse concepts and quite prolific in his writing on such things. In this blog posting you see him saying
I don't think that your understanding of the matter is superior to mine or to his. Michael Hardy ( talk) 20:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Can you tell me whether I am right or wrong in my surmise that your position on this question of affine spaces comes down to this?:
As you may or may not have noticed, I publicly guessed that that is what you have in mind in this section. Michael Hardy ( talk) 23:45, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
The article Gravitationally aligned orbits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Summary of a theory presented in a research paper. Google scholar shows about 20 citations, 1/3rd are self citations, rest of them mention other ideas presented in the paper but not the subject of this article. So, fails WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
UbedJunejo (
talk•
cont)
19:25, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spiral galaxy dynamics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiral galaxy dynamics until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.-- UbedJunejo ( talk• cont) 19:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi RQG!
FYI, the resource Spiral galaxy dynamics can be imported to Wikiversity before it's deleted here and would be welcome. -- Marshallsumter ( talk) 17:06, 16 March 2018 (UTC)