This is your page for comments (as well as questions, notices, etc.). The other page tells people a little bit about yourself, your topics of interest, etc. and generally should only be edited by yourself. - Jéské ( v^_^v Mrrph-mph!) 02:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I just wanted to give you a heads up that you're on the verge of violating the three revert rule at No Child Left Behind. The rule prevents more than three reversions on any given page in any given 24 hour period; you're sitting at three, which means that one more reversion will break the rule. Just a friendly warning, since I imagine that you weren't previously aware of the rule. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 02:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Friendly warning? Pretty cute. Sarcastic? Sarcasticidealist?
When we have a list of press releases and pro-NCLB editorial documents and two of you censor the cartoon, it is pretty serious stuff. It makes a mockery of the balance policies. When you then claim that everything in that heading needs to be based on information, it makes no sense at all. The heading uses the term "editorial." What's going on here? Are you actually protecting balance, fairnesss and truth or are you censoring and deleting material that conflicts with your personal political preferences? The violations you site don't fit here, except that you have ganged up to delete something you don't like. There is plenty in this article I don't like, but Wikipedia is not about "group think," censorship or deleting what offends you.
If you have any sense of fair play, balance and freedom of speech, you will restore the cartoon to sit alongside the President's editorializing. If you do not restore the cartoon, you have violated a neutral point of view (NPOV). By deleting it, you protect a list of biased pro-NCLB press releases and statements from the White House and Ed Department. This is commonly called a "sin of omission."
I write this sincerely and not sarcastically.
( Questiontveracity ( talk) 02:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC))
Big improvement. Thanks. Why pick "sarcastic" as a handle? It reduces your credibility.
I looked at WP:EL and think if the section was headed "editorials" that WP:EL does not apply, but I am pleased by your change of this whole section and elimination of most of the pro-NCLB White House stuff. Truth is well served by your changes.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiptoety talk 03:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
This is your page for comments (as well as questions, notices, etc.). The other page tells people a little bit about yourself, your topics of interest, etc. and generally should only be edited by yourself. - Jéské ( v^_^v Mrrph-mph!) 02:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I just wanted to give you a heads up that you're on the verge of violating the three revert rule at No Child Left Behind. The rule prevents more than three reversions on any given page in any given 24 hour period; you're sitting at three, which means that one more reversion will break the rule. Just a friendly warning, since I imagine that you weren't previously aware of the rule. Sarcasticidealist ( talk) 02:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Friendly warning? Pretty cute. Sarcastic? Sarcasticidealist?
When we have a list of press releases and pro-NCLB editorial documents and two of you censor the cartoon, it is pretty serious stuff. It makes a mockery of the balance policies. When you then claim that everything in that heading needs to be based on information, it makes no sense at all. The heading uses the term "editorial." What's going on here? Are you actually protecting balance, fairnesss and truth or are you censoring and deleting material that conflicts with your personal political preferences? The violations you site don't fit here, except that you have ganged up to delete something you don't like. There is plenty in this article I don't like, but Wikipedia is not about "group think," censorship or deleting what offends you.
If you have any sense of fair play, balance and freedom of speech, you will restore the cartoon to sit alongside the President's editorializing. If you do not restore the cartoon, you have violated a neutral point of view (NPOV). By deleting it, you protect a list of biased pro-NCLB press releases and statements from the White House and Ed Department. This is commonly called a "sin of omission."
I write this sincerely and not sarcastically.
( Questiontveracity ( talk) 02:56, 29 July 2008 (UTC))
Big improvement. Thanks. Why pick "sarcastic" as a handle? It reduces your credibility.
I looked at WP:EL and think if the section was headed "editorials" that WP:EL does not apply, but I am pleased by your change of this whole section and elimination of most of the pro-NCLB White House stuff. Truth is well served by your changes.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiptoety talk 03:05, 29 July 2008 (UTC)