![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | → | Archive 30 |
I'm not saying I don't believe you. I'm saying I find it hard to believe that listing future PL fixtures would somehow be disallowed under copyright law. So please point me towards that stipulation. Nuked ( talk) 10:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
I read the "articles" and the actual articles linked within the last link you posted. Although there is confusion, it seems pretty clear that there is no copyright to fixtures. Live fixtures, maybe, but not simple fixtures. So please do not remove them again. Nuked ( talk) 13:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Why don't you stop reverting my contribution? I've already shown you why it's a valid contribution, to which you've replied nothing. Nuked ( talk) 05:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Following the comments made on your thoughts about adminship a couple of months ago, I see you are still misusing Twinkle to revert editors you are having a content dispute with. Can you give me a reason not to request it's removed from your permissions? And I might add, your most recent revert is pathetic – you've clearly been proved wrong on the fixtures issue, so trying to justify continuing to remove useful material via another excuse is really quite petty behaviour; if the fixtures are moved, the text can be amended – other websites list fixtures as they are currently planned (as we do with events like elections, but move them if the dates change). You will never be an admin if you carry on like this. Number 5 7 13:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
You just undid my change of birthplace in the article about Kevin De Bruyne, you added as comment "Unsourced". Drongen is a submunicipality of the city of Ghent and there is no hospital, almost everybody goes to a hospital in the city centre of Ghent, so he most be born there. Since Drongen is a submunicipality it's correct anyway to say he's born in Ghent. Even if his mother gave birth at home in Drongen there will be "Gent" as birthplace on his identity card! Who will know best: me who's born, raised and still living in Ghent or you? Gentenaar~nlwiki ( talk) 15:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed that you reverted my edit in 2015–16 Svenska Cupen after I put "( Lund)" after Andreas Ekberg's name. I thought it was praxis to write the city after the name (or the country if it's a national team match), but i guess that have changed? I would appreciate if you wrote wrote explanations in the edit summary instead of just revering. Have a nice Sunday! :) // Mattias321 (talk) 12:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I have a quick question. Do you think we should maintain the use of the sponsor name (Etihad Stadium) at the Champions League articles or accept the change PeeJay2K3 made a few days ago to City of Manchester Stadium? He only changed in Man City's case. Thank you in advance. The Replicator ( talk) 19:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Everything I wrote about Taylor is factual, I was at the game and it happened exactly as I said. Please don``t delete my post because you don`t like it. It is factual and it is accurate and totally referenced as it was on TV and I have watched it over and over. FirthyFlaps ( talk) 20:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Qed237,
Noticed you around a lot in the history of various football pages, so thought I'd ask for your help. Apologies if this is presumptuous. The club badge on Rotherham United F.C. - [1] is incorrect. It's the pre-2005 rebranding badge, although to the occasional viewer it's not exactly obvious. I'm happy to fix this, but I have absolutely no idea how to do so. Could you point me in the right direction please? Cheers Gricehead ( talk) 09:15, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Can u please edit the wikipedia page of the 2015-16 FA cup because i tried to edit it but i did not do it properly so can u please edit it for me.Thank u. A.Mamun — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMamun84 ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Qed237
Harry did not play for Watford , he trained with them for 4 weeks before joining Tottenham and I was not born in Galway !!
Kanewiki ( talk) 12:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)kanewiki
Hello Qed237!
I noticed there are no youth caps at aforementioned players' profile, so I found some sources that I have put on his talk page, could you just look at them and check of they're reliable? And what to do next?
Thanks! HenryChinaski91 ( talk) 21:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Qed237,
I noticed that you removed the lineup based on appearances from 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. season that I had created several weeks ago. Per protocol here on WP, I assume good faith (even from an Arsenal supporter), especially from a user as experienced and skilled as yourself, but I was just curious as to why you made this edit. I've only been editing for a few months and am still learning the finest points of things here, so if you could let me know, I'd very much appreciate it.
Thanks! Amccann421 ( talk) 04:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Qed, here again to ask you a question.... Would it be notable if I made a list of goals article of the remaining players at List of top international association football goal scorers by country that do not have an article about their goals yet, some of my lists have been deleted so it would be so kind of you if you can make me a short list of the players that whose international goal list article would be notable? I await your answer at my talk page. Thank you : ) TheSoccerBoy ( talk) 01:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Stop editing Template:2015–16 Liga I Relegation Round table. You want it to be your way, and your way is wrong. You are nobody, I am a nobody too. We are here only to follow some rules, and the OFFICIAL rules about Liga I are decided by FRF and LPF. I dont know who is scoresway.com, but they are not official. On frfotbal.ro, the standings are from 1 to 8. http://frfotbal.ro/index.php?competition_id=89 On lpf.ro, the same. http://www.lpf.ro/clasament-liga-1 I guess that they know what they do. At the end of the season you can add an entire table with all the places from 1 to 14. But until then, this table has to begin with number 1. Eddie Nixon ( talk) 23:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I just logged in to see if anything has happened with my unblock request and saw a message with final warning from User:Laberkiste that I had created, before it was removed by User:Floquenbeam. @ Laberkiste: what page were you talking about? As far as I am concerned I have never created such article. @ Floquenbeam: Do you think this have or will affect my chances of getting unblocked, seeing it has been there for 3 hours during my unblock request? Also while I am already asking and you being an admin, how long do you think it would take before my request is answered? Qed237 (talk) 21:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Being blocked for over 24 hours (out of 48) so thought I could check if leagues in my sandbox needed updating but I see that I have not been unblocked. Seeing that blocking admin @ Number 57: is happy with unblock and @ Floquenbeam: is inclined to unblock but not around, is there any other admin out there interested in unblocking me? @ GiantSnowman and Mattythewhite: perhaps? Qed237 (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Number 5 7 13:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Qed237 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
First of all I would like to appologies for my behaviour at Template:2015–16 Liga I Relegation Round table which led to this block. I dont not show myself from my best side. But I have a few reasons for an unblock or at least reduced block length. #A block is to prevent further disruption (and not punishment) and I promise from now on I will not modify positions in that template until a consensus has formed. However, if I may, I would still like to update matchresults if needed to keep it up-to-date, but I can stay of it completely if required. #I have edited for 3 years in June and made over 50K edits,, so I am clearly not here with an intention to disrupt wikipedia so a 48 hours seems strong #Besides checking my wathlist vandalism occasionally, I currently am working in my sandbox User:Qed237/sandbox and User:Qed237/sandbox4 where I keep track of all leagues and what will happen the upcoming days. This helps avoiding disruption on 2016–17 UEFA Champions League and 2016–17 UEFA Europa League (as well as the league tables) as editors has a habbit of adding teams of their choice that has not qualified. For that reason I want to be unblocked so that I can continue to make this work in my sandbox, and if permitted make update accordingly (or others that I know follow my sandbox can do it). Neither should be disruptive #Also I would like the ability to defend myself regarding this intent at WT:FOOTY to have my twinkle rights removed, also requested at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle#Preventing use of Twinkle. I hate to say it, but Number57 is in my opinion overreacting, and I have gotten support diff. Although a block is warrented here, I admit to that, and as I said I am sorry, my twinkle rights should not have to be removed and Number57 has been targetting me before and is not neutral, showed by claiming that the other editor was only breaking 3RR while I was "going well beyond 3RR". #I can also take a voluteer day of next week instead, when not being this busy with matches as it is on a weekend. To also make this clear, I think the other editor, User:Eddie Nixon also deserves the same chance to get unblocked if they appologies as well. And if someone breaks that trust (I promise I wont) then a block could be reinstated or made longer. Qed237 (talk) 14:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Accept reason:
per section below. Please take Number 57's comments about edit warring and Twinkle to heart; there is almost never something that has to be done your way right this second. Floquenbeam ( talk) 20:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I've left them a message, thanks. Giant Snowman 17:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Dear User:Qed237. Your User:Qed237/sandbox4 is on overflow and appears at Category:Pages_where_template_include_size_is_exceeded. Perhaps could you help us to empty this maintenance category by splitting this sandbox page ? This would also allow a complete display of the contents of your sandboxes. Thanks in advance. Pldx1 ( talk) 15:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
I was only putting things right for the monthly awards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.208.65 ( talk) 19:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Qed237. You recently warned me for supposedly not providing reliable sources for an edit at 2019 AFC Asian Cup qualification. I don't know what you are referring to as the source I used was directly from the AFC. If that isn't considered a reliable source than I honestly don't know what is. The edit was to clarify the situation ahead of the draw which is also based on the source given. Perhaps you didn't understand the situation regarding the play-off round and therefore have taken my edits as dubious. As FIFA has since clarified the situation with Kuwait, it then proves that the report from the AFC which I used was in fact accurate and therefore reliable. Although in general, reports from the Asian Football Confederation are reliable. So hopefully next time you would try and understand the situation, in this case, the situation ahead of the draw for the play-off round before warning users such as myself that we aren't making constructive edits due to supposed unreliable sources which is false in this case. If I'm going to be honest, your warning made me feel a bit offended. You probably don't care about that but that's how I think about your warning. Anyways apart from that I'm/we're all good now hopefully. Hope you understand. Thanks! InternacionalFutbolista ( talk) 07:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
You removed my editing because you say you avoid sponsor names. Well, the problem is is that their field is called Vitality Stadium sponsor or not. To say it is called Dean Court, is inaccurate. You don't change the name of American Football stadiums because of sponsors. The Cowboys field is listed as AT&T Stadium, The Saints stadium is the Mercedes-Benz Stadium and so on and so on with the American squads. Either things need to be accurate or consistent. If you want to be inaccurate listing European Soccer stadiums without sponsors, then the same should be done with American Football stadiums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.11.193.202 ( talk) 15:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
I guess it is just minorly off-putting. You watch the games and hear the announcers and it says welcome to The Hawthorns, Emirates Stadium, The Etihad, Vicarage Road, Old Trafford, Stamford Bridge. They all match until you get to welcome to the Vitality Stadium oh wait Dean Court. As far as the different sponsors, they are in the first of a 3 year deal, so it will be at least a couple of years. Even then, I'm not sure how the fact that it may change soon would make it ok for it to be inaccurate now as far as that being the excuse. You wouldn't have Barack Obama as the former president of the U.S. just because his role will change soon.
I understand the reasons and its fine. I guess I just prefer the real name over the common name. Oh well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.11.193.202 ( talk) 16:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Qed237.
On page 2016–17 UEFA Champions League Liepāja has coeff.=2.325 (as coeff. Liepājas Metalurgs).
But on Kassies' page Liepāja has coeff.=1.075 (as new team with only country ranking).
Liepāja is Liepājas Metalurgs or new team? Who is right? GAV80 ( talk) 19:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
The Superleague Greece official site: http://www.superleaguegreece.net/el/scoreboard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:5404:8400:9DCC:15AF:5BFC:932E ( talk) 13:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Can you please tell me what's the problem and you undid my edit ? All the matches have finished and the statistics are from the official page. Chris.astrtas565 ( talk) 21:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
@ Chris.astrtas565: Awesome. Thank you very much. Qed237 (talk) 16:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks - I've blocked them per WP:CIR and WP:NOTHERE. Giant Snowman 10:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent revert for the template is inconsistent and makes no sense. The outcome of the cup competition is irrelevant as the third-best team (in case if the third would be Dnipro) that is eligible for continental competition would still qualify for the group stage. And inconsistent is due to the fact that both Dynamo and Shakhtar also qualified for the third qualification round of the Champions League, yet they are marked as uncertain. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 00:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
I think you can argue 1000 times also does not change the fact that hockey doesn't have knockout stage, every team will still play for final classification. I can't accept your argument that semi-finals are knockout stage, while losing semi-finals team still fighting for bronze medal. Sorry this is not football. System from one sport are not necessary apply to another sport without understand to it. -- Aleen f1 12:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
It is a knockout stage. Simple. Kante4 ( talk) 13:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thanks, I only translated results from the Official Website: http://www.gibraltarfa.com/domestic-football/first-division, and not watched the match. Thanks again-- Noel baran ( talk) 21:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the "thanks" QED, but AGAIN I know I performed a wrong move (updating a game before it was over). My turn now to say "thank you for being so patient". Hey, it could be worse, have a look at this update in Urko Vera, is this guy great or what (a brace WITHOUT playing?! https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Urko_Vera&diff=714200088&oldid=703915210).
Happy editing, all the best as always -- Be Quiet AL ( talk) 00:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Done
Giant
Snowman
19:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Arsenal F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunderland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the reminder but was there an occasion I did not do this? I usually am sure to make sure I update the timestamp in both the infobox and career stats box. Cheers. -- ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 18:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Schedule -- M&m89 ( talk) 14:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Noticed you reverting the above user. I've been watching his contributions since I ran into him on Ecuador national football team.
User seems to be a long term problem that is getting short term fixes. He has two problematic editing methods:
This basically sums up 95% of his contributions. I raised at WP:AIV yesterday, but only managed to get the Ecuador page semi-protected, whereas I think this user needs an IP ban (again) as he isn't getting the message judging by his talk page. Thoughts? Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 15:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey, i would take the "new" one. Seeding can be seen if you scroll up... Kante4 ( talk) 16:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello again. Qed237. About Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics.
On pages Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament and Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament written "Group". But template for groups named "Pool" ( Template:2016 Summer Olympics men's volleyball pool A standings and other). Also "Pool" written in volleyball's navbox ( Template:2016 Summer Olympics volleyball convenience template navbox).
Also in Template:2016 Summer Olympics volleyball convenience template navbox written "Matches", but on all other navboxes written "Games". GAV80 ( talk) 06:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello my friend. Please note that UEFA gives two spots in Greek teams for the 2016–17 UEFA Europa League third qualifying round and only one spot for the 2016–17 UEFA Europa League second qualifying round. Thanks, Dimitrissss ( talk) 22:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I received a message saying you reverted one of my edits because it is a "test", but according to the revision history, no such revert seems to be made. I am assuming that you reverted this edit, which in the record showed "The Replicator" reverted.
I think "but will be reduced to under 80,000"(A) is a better wording than "but is reduced to just under 80,000"(B). I wonder what is the justification of prefering B over A. (I use American English conventions, and that might be different from Br Eng conventions)
Thanks.
Ueutyi ( talk) 01:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey instead of telling me how to do it (complicated) can you fix it then because its people like you who keep undoing work done by people like me and my clubs players (Manchester United) have false stats. He has 83 apps 20 goals in league play FACT according to ManUtd.com and soccerbase.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by GanjaCaliphate ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Articles 2015–16 Montenegrin Cup & 2015–16 Georgian Cup must be updated due to outdating to current stages on the first page is final and on the second page is also final. Please update these articles because are required to present competition. -- 5.172.232.249 ( talk) 17:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey I was trying to edit Niko Kovac's coaching career stats with Eintracht Frankfurt but something got messed up. Was wondering if you could help.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantunovic ( talk • contribs) 21:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
I see you changed all < br > to < br /> on 2015–16 Liga I, how do those differ exactly? LICA98 ( talk) 08:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
<br>
and <br />
are both valid, but <br />
is preferred as it will be rendered correctly in all circumstances, including strict XHTML. Normally
HTML Tidy will convert <br>
and other valid forms like <br/>
and <br >
to <br />
including some of the invalid forms like </br>
, <br,>
and <br.>
. This conversion does not work in a number of MediaWiki interface pages and can cause invalid HTML and problems rendering the page. Other wikis may not have HTML Tidy enabled, thus exported pages using an incorrect break tag will result in invalid HTML. So both are valid, I just prefer <br />
as it will always work.
Qed237
(talk)
10:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Qed, I understand what your trying to say about unsourced edits, On the sponsorship table I put a reference right next to the team name on every team and that link gave out info on every single element required on the table, Ok, I get that captain mistake, but it doesn't mean you have revert the whole thing. I'm not trying to annoy or mock you, I'm just improving the article TheSoccerBoy ( talk) 03:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
If I had got there first I would have just added a cite needed tag. :P Fenix down ( talk) 14:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | → | Archive 30 |
I'm not saying I don't believe you. I'm saying I find it hard to believe that listing future PL fixtures would somehow be disallowed under copyright law. So please point me towards that stipulation. Nuked ( talk) 10:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
I read the "articles" and the actual articles linked within the last link you posted. Although there is confusion, it seems pretty clear that there is no copyright to fixtures. Live fixtures, maybe, but not simple fixtures. So please do not remove them again. Nuked ( talk) 13:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
Why don't you stop reverting my contribution? I've already shown you why it's a valid contribution, to which you've replied nothing. Nuked ( talk) 05:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Following the comments made on your thoughts about adminship a couple of months ago, I see you are still misusing Twinkle to revert editors you are having a content dispute with. Can you give me a reason not to request it's removed from your permissions? And I might add, your most recent revert is pathetic – you've clearly been proved wrong on the fixtures issue, so trying to justify continuing to remove useful material via another excuse is really quite petty behaviour; if the fixtures are moved, the text can be amended – other websites list fixtures as they are currently planned (as we do with events like elections, but move them if the dates change). You will never be an admin if you carry on like this. Number 5 7 13:36, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
You just undid my change of birthplace in the article about Kevin De Bruyne, you added as comment "Unsourced". Drongen is a submunicipality of the city of Ghent and there is no hospital, almost everybody goes to a hospital in the city centre of Ghent, so he most be born there. Since Drongen is a submunicipality it's correct anyway to say he's born in Ghent. Even if his mother gave birth at home in Drongen there will be "Gent" as birthplace on his identity card! Who will know best: me who's born, raised and still living in Ghent or you? Gentenaar~nlwiki ( talk) 15:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed that you reverted my edit in 2015–16 Svenska Cupen after I put "( Lund)" after Andreas Ekberg's name. I thought it was praxis to write the city after the name (or the country if it's a national team match), but i guess that have changed? I would appreciate if you wrote wrote explanations in the edit summary instead of just revering. Have a nice Sunday! :) // Mattias321 (talk) 12:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I have a quick question. Do you think we should maintain the use of the sponsor name (Etihad Stadium) at the Champions League articles or accept the change PeeJay2K3 made a few days ago to City of Manchester Stadium? He only changed in Man City's case. Thank you in advance. The Replicator ( talk) 19:15, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Everything I wrote about Taylor is factual, I was at the game and it happened exactly as I said. Please don``t delete my post because you don`t like it. It is factual and it is accurate and totally referenced as it was on TV and I have watched it over and over. FirthyFlaps ( talk) 20:29, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Qed237,
Noticed you around a lot in the history of various football pages, so thought I'd ask for your help. Apologies if this is presumptuous. The club badge on Rotherham United F.C. - [1] is incorrect. It's the pre-2005 rebranding badge, although to the occasional viewer it's not exactly obvious. I'm happy to fix this, but I have absolutely no idea how to do so. Could you point me in the right direction please? Cheers Gricehead ( talk) 09:15, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Can u please edit the wikipedia page of the 2015-16 FA cup because i tried to edit it but i did not do it properly so can u please edit it for me.Thank u. A.Mamun — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMamun84 ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Qed237
Harry did not play for Watford , he trained with them for 4 weeks before joining Tottenham and I was not born in Galway !!
Kanewiki ( talk) 12:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)kanewiki
Hello Qed237!
I noticed there are no youth caps at aforementioned players' profile, so I found some sources that I have put on his talk page, could you just look at them and check of they're reliable? And what to do next?
Thanks! HenryChinaski91 ( talk) 21:50, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello Qed237,
I noticed that you removed the lineup based on appearances from 2015–16 Chelsea F.C. season that I had created several weeks ago. Per protocol here on WP, I assume good faith (even from an Arsenal supporter), especially from a user as experienced and skilled as yourself, but I was just curious as to why you made this edit. I've only been editing for a few months and am still learning the finest points of things here, so if you could let me know, I'd very much appreciate it.
Thanks! Amccann421 ( talk) 04:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Qed, here again to ask you a question.... Would it be notable if I made a list of goals article of the remaining players at List of top international association football goal scorers by country that do not have an article about their goals yet, some of my lists have been deleted so it would be so kind of you if you can make me a short list of the players that whose international goal list article would be notable? I await your answer at my talk page. Thank you : ) TheSoccerBoy ( talk) 01:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Stop editing Template:2015–16 Liga I Relegation Round table. You want it to be your way, and your way is wrong. You are nobody, I am a nobody too. We are here only to follow some rules, and the OFFICIAL rules about Liga I are decided by FRF and LPF. I dont know who is scoresway.com, but they are not official. On frfotbal.ro, the standings are from 1 to 8. http://frfotbal.ro/index.php?competition_id=89 On lpf.ro, the same. http://www.lpf.ro/clasament-liga-1 I guess that they know what they do. At the end of the season you can add an entire table with all the places from 1 to 14. But until then, this table has to begin with number 1. Eddie Nixon ( talk) 23:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
I just logged in to see if anything has happened with my unblock request and saw a message with final warning from User:Laberkiste that I had created, before it was removed by User:Floquenbeam. @ Laberkiste: what page were you talking about? As far as I am concerned I have never created such article. @ Floquenbeam: Do you think this have or will affect my chances of getting unblocked, seeing it has been there for 3 hours during my unblock request? Also while I am already asking and you being an admin, how long do you think it would take before my request is answered? Qed237 (talk) 21:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Being blocked for over 24 hours (out of 48) so thought I could check if leagues in my sandbox needed updating but I see that I have not been unblocked. Seeing that blocking admin @ Number 57: is happy with unblock and @ Floquenbeam: is inclined to unblock but not around, is there any other admin out there interested in unblocking me? @ GiantSnowman and Mattythewhite: perhaps? Qed237 (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Number 5 7 13:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Qed237 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
First of all I would like to appologies for my behaviour at Template:2015–16 Liga I Relegation Round table which led to this block. I dont not show myself from my best side. But I have a few reasons for an unblock or at least reduced block length. #A block is to prevent further disruption (and not punishment) and I promise from now on I will not modify positions in that template until a consensus has formed. However, if I may, I would still like to update matchresults if needed to keep it up-to-date, but I can stay of it completely if required. #I have edited for 3 years in June and made over 50K edits,, so I am clearly not here with an intention to disrupt wikipedia so a 48 hours seems strong #Besides checking my wathlist vandalism occasionally, I currently am working in my sandbox User:Qed237/sandbox and User:Qed237/sandbox4 where I keep track of all leagues and what will happen the upcoming days. This helps avoiding disruption on 2016–17 UEFA Champions League and 2016–17 UEFA Europa League (as well as the league tables) as editors has a habbit of adding teams of their choice that has not qualified. For that reason I want to be unblocked so that I can continue to make this work in my sandbox, and if permitted make update accordingly (or others that I know follow my sandbox can do it). Neither should be disruptive #Also I would like the ability to defend myself regarding this intent at WT:FOOTY to have my twinkle rights removed, also requested at Wikipedia talk:Twinkle#Preventing use of Twinkle. I hate to say it, but Number57 is in my opinion overreacting, and I have gotten support diff. Although a block is warrented here, I admit to that, and as I said I am sorry, my twinkle rights should not have to be removed and Number57 has been targetting me before and is not neutral, showed by claiming that the other editor was only breaking 3RR while I was "going well beyond 3RR". #I can also take a voluteer day of next week instead, when not being this busy with matches as it is on a weekend. To also make this clear, I think the other editor, User:Eddie Nixon also deserves the same chance to get unblocked if they appologies as well. And if someone breaks that trust (I promise I wont) then a block could be reinstated or made longer. Qed237 (talk) 14:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Accept reason:
per section below. Please take Number 57's comments about edit warring and Twinkle to heart; there is almost never something that has to be done your way right this second. Floquenbeam ( talk) 20:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I've left them a message, thanks. Giant Snowman 17:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Dear User:Qed237. Your User:Qed237/sandbox4 is on overflow and appears at Category:Pages_where_template_include_size_is_exceeded. Perhaps could you help us to empty this maintenance category by splitting this sandbox page ? This would also allow a complete display of the contents of your sandboxes. Thanks in advance. Pldx1 ( talk) 15:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
I was only putting things right for the monthly awards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.208.65 ( talk) 19:09, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Qed237. You recently warned me for supposedly not providing reliable sources for an edit at 2019 AFC Asian Cup qualification. I don't know what you are referring to as the source I used was directly from the AFC. If that isn't considered a reliable source than I honestly don't know what is. The edit was to clarify the situation ahead of the draw which is also based on the source given. Perhaps you didn't understand the situation regarding the play-off round and therefore have taken my edits as dubious. As FIFA has since clarified the situation with Kuwait, it then proves that the report from the AFC which I used was in fact accurate and therefore reliable. Although in general, reports from the Asian Football Confederation are reliable. So hopefully next time you would try and understand the situation, in this case, the situation ahead of the draw for the play-off round before warning users such as myself that we aren't making constructive edits due to supposed unreliable sources which is false in this case. If I'm going to be honest, your warning made me feel a bit offended. You probably don't care about that but that's how I think about your warning. Anyways apart from that I'm/we're all good now hopefully. Hope you understand. Thanks! InternacionalFutbolista ( talk) 07:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
You removed my editing because you say you avoid sponsor names. Well, the problem is is that their field is called Vitality Stadium sponsor or not. To say it is called Dean Court, is inaccurate. You don't change the name of American Football stadiums because of sponsors. The Cowboys field is listed as AT&T Stadium, The Saints stadium is the Mercedes-Benz Stadium and so on and so on with the American squads. Either things need to be accurate or consistent. If you want to be inaccurate listing European Soccer stadiums without sponsors, then the same should be done with American Football stadiums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.11.193.202 ( talk) 15:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
I guess it is just minorly off-putting. You watch the games and hear the announcers and it says welcome to The Hawthorns, Emirates Stadium, The Etihad, Vicarage Road, Old Trafford, Stamford Bridge. They all match until you get to welcome to the Vitality Stadium oh wait Dean Court. As far as the different sponsors, they are in the first of a 3 year deal, so it will be at least a couple of years. Even then, I'm not sure how the fact that it may change soon would make it ok for it to be inaccurate now as far as that being the excuse. You wouldn't have Barack Obama as the former president of the U.S. just because his role will change soon.
I understand the reasons and its fine. I guess I just prefer the real name over the common name. Oh well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.11.193.202 ( talk) 16:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Qed237.
On page 2016–17 UEFA Champions League Liepāja has coeff.=2.325 (as coeff. Liepājas Metalurgs).
But on Kassies' page Liepāja has coeff.=1.075 (as new team with only country ranking).
Liepāja is Liepājas Metalurgs or new team? Who is right? GAV80 ( talk) 19:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
The Superleague Greece official site: http://www.superleaguegreece.net/el/scoreboard — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:5404:8400:9DCC:15AF:5BFC:932E ( talk) 13:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Can you please tell me what's the problem and you undid my edit ? All the matches have finished and the statistics are from the official page. Chris.astrtas565 ( talk) 21:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
@ Chris.astrtas565: Awesome. Thank you very much. Qed237 (talk) 16:33, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks - I've blocked them per WP:CIR and WP:NOTHERE. Giant Snowman 10:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
Your recent revert for the template is inconsistent and makes no sense. The outcome of the cup competition is irrelevant as the third-best team (in case if the third would be Dnipro) that is eligible for continental competition would still qualify for the group stage. And inconsistent is due to the fact that both Dynamo and Shakhtar also qualified for the third qualification round of the Champions League, yet they are marked as uncertain. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 00:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
I think you can argue 1000 times also does not change the fact that hockey doesn't have knockout stage, every team will still play for final classification. I can't accept your argument that semi-finals are knockout stage, while losing semi-finals team still fighting for bronze medal. Sorry this is not football. System from one sport are not necessary apply to another sport without understand to it. -- Aleen f1 12:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
It is a knockout stage. Simple. Kante4 ( talk) 13:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thanks, I only translated results from the Official Website: http://www.gibraltarfa.com/domestic-football/first-division, and not watched the match. Thanks again-- Noel baran ( talk) 21:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the "thanks" QED, but AGAIN I know I performed a wrong move (updating a game before it was over). My turn now to say "thank you for being so patient". Hey, it could be worse, have a look at this update in Urko Vera, is this guy great or what (a brace WITHOUT playing?! https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Urko_Vera&diff=714200088&oldid=703915210).
Happy editing, all the best as always -- Be Quiet AL ( talk) 00:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Done
Giant
Snowman
19:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Arsenal F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunderland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the reminder but was there an occasion I did not do this? I usually am sure to make sure I update the timestamp in both the infobox and career stats box. Cheers. -- ArsenalFan700 ( talk) 18:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Schedule -- M&m89 ( talk) 14:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Noticed you reverting the above user. I've been watching his contributions since I ran into him on Ecuador national football team.
User seems to be a long term problem that is getting short term fixes. He has two problematic editing methods:
This basically sums up 95% of his contributions. I raised at WP:AIV yesterday, but only managed to get the Ecuador page semi-protected, whereas I think this user needs an IP ban (again) as he isn't getting the message judging by his talk page. Thoughts? Cheers, Gricehead ( talk) 15:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey, i would take the "new" one. Seeding can be seen if you scroll up... Kante4 ( talk) 16:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello again. Qed237. About Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics.
On pages Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Men's tournament and Volleyball at the 2016 Summer Olympics – Women's tournament written "Group". But template for groups named "Pool" ( Template:2016 Summer Olympics men's volleyball pool A standings and other). Also "Pool" written in volleyball's navbox ( Template:2016 Summer Olympics volleyball convenience template navbox).
Also in Template:2016 Summer Olympics volleyball convenience template navbox written "Matches", but on all other navboxes written "Games". GAV80 ( talk) 06:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello my friend. Please note that UEFA gives two spots in Greek teams for the 2016–17 UEFA Europa League third qualifying round and only one spot for the 2016–17 UEFA Europa League second qualifying round. Thanks, Dimitrissss ( talk) 22:00, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
I received a message saying you reverted one of my edits because it is a "test", but according to the revision history, no such revert seems to be made. I am assuming that you reverted this edit, which in the record showed "The Replicator" reverted.
I think "but will be reduced to under 80,000"(A) is a better wording than "but is reduced to just under 80,000"(B). I wonder what is the justification of prefering B over A. (I use American English conventions, and that might be different from Br Eng conventions)
Thanks.
Ueutyi ( talk) 01:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey instead of telling me how to do it (complicated) can you fix it then because its people like you who keep undoing work done by people like me and my clubs players (Manchester United) have false stats. He has 83 apps 20 goals in league play FACT according to ManUtd.com and soccerbase.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by GanjaCaliphate ( talk • contribs) 15:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Articles 2015–16 Montenegrin Cup & 2015–16 Georgian Cup must be updated due to outdating to current stages on the first page is final and on the second page is also final. Please update these articles because are required to present competition. -- 5.172.232.249 ( talk) 17:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Hey I was trying to edit Niko Kovac's coaching career stats with Eintracht Frankfurt but something got messed up. Was wondering if you could help.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantunovic ( talk • contribs) 21:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
I see you changed all < br > to < br /> on 2015–16 Liga I, how do those differ exactly? LICA98 ( talk) 08:45, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
<br>
and <br />
are both valid, but <br />
is preferred as it will be rendered correctly in all circumstances, including strict XHTML. Normally
HTML Tidy will convert <br>
and other valid forms like <br/>
and <br >
to <br />
including some of the invalid forms like </br>
, <br,>
and <br.>
. This conversion does not work in a number of MediaWiki interface pages and can cause invalid HTML and problems rendering the page. Other wikis may not have HTML Tidy enabled, thus exported pages using an incorrect break tag will result in invalid HTML. So both are valid, I just prefer <br />
as it will always work.
Qed237
(talk)
10:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Qed, I understand what your trying to say about unsourced edits, On the sponsorship table I put a reference right next to the team name on every team and that link gave out info on every single element required on the table, Ok, I get that captain mistake, but it doesn't mean you have revert the whole thing. I'm not trying to annoy or mock you, I'm just improving the article TheSoccerBoy ( talk) 03:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
If I had got there first I would have just added a cite needed tag. :P Fenix down ( talk) 14:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)