![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Your recent editing history at 2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mentoz86 ( talk) 16:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Mentoz is correct, edit warring to make a 'correct' edit is still edit warring. You need to use the talk page. Giant Snowman 08:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Yes I was edit warring I realze that. But I still dont know what "another source" some of the others were using. They just changed the numbers but without sourcing it, and to me that is disruptive editing. You cant say it is correct for them to change without refering to a source. QED237 (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Regulations state that if teams are tied, classification is conducted between them. Montenegro won't be able to play Ukraine any more and are 1-4 in GD between them. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 21:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
The ranking in each group is determined as follows: [1]
If two or more teams are equal on the basis of the above three criteria, their rankings shall be determined as follows:
There. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 21:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
EXACTLY. What does b) say? Please read b) again... =) QED237 (talk) 21:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
How were my edits at 2013–14 Reading F.C. season unconstructive and disruptive. Including players promoted from academy as "transfers" is WP:NOTSTATS and do not belong in that article. As for the Matchday Sqauds section at the Everton season page I fail to see how that is disruptive. I feel this warning is very harsh and will consider requesting its removal. 109.149.0.41 ( talk) 12:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the situation regarding the Czech Republic. I had overlooked the worst runner-up scenario! Woodlandscaley ( talk) 22:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for undoing the vandalism on the page. Was about to do it myself. Anyway we can make the page semi-protected to prevent further vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krzy32 ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Kane ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 20:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please show me where the consensus was reached not to include matchday scenarios? Ivan Volodin ( talk) 14:52, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
hi there,i tried changing this because its in correct..henrik Larsson scored 59 European goals in total during his carer most of which were in the lower European competition the Europa league or as it was known when he was playing the uefa cup..these are different competitions from the uefa champions league where in fact henrik larrsson scored I think 5 or 6 goals a long way from 59.he does not deserve to be there as im sure you willnow be aware of,you could probably check this from one of wikis pages on henrik Larsson its clear on that page thanks,thomas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.28.23.227 ( talk) 21:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
With all due respect, I understand you're only being officious, but I'm only updating appearances not providing live data pertaining to the actual match result. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TLWC1905 ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Yes mate updating the, appearances, goals, top goalscorer chart, booking/red card chart, league table etc. should wait until the matches are over in my view as it is still under the live updates. Skyblueshaun ( talk) 22:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Hello , i am understand, not problems. Ionel141 ( talk) 13:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, No problem always happy to help. Transfermarkt is definitely not a reliable source as it is edited by the public and not accurate. If I am honest I haven't heard of the other source. But I would suggest that you leave a message on his/her's talkpage to say your reason why. If he/she continues to re-vert or undo your change of source then let me know the user name. Skyblueshaun ( talk) 17:34, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
I removed the live scores. Why are you going after me for that? -- Kitch ( Talk : Contrib) 17:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Can't wait, eh? Some people are busy in real life at times and it can take time to answer, don't like your tone...
Look at the FIFA World Cup articles or UEFA Euro ones, those have kits included. I did not check the other articles from the previous years because i only know "those" (FIFA/UEFA ones, was not talking about the playoff matches only...) matches WITH kits. Still i think you should started it but that does not matter. We can take it to Footy, i will comment there and see what happens. I'm not THAT into it, to follow it daily or so and live with the result(s). Tell me one thing, what's so bad about having the kits there?
P.S.: Somehow i don't like your acting on wikipedia, but maybe that's just me (and should not affect anything). Kante4 ( talk) 20:32, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I'll be reporting him soon for edit warring anyways, and I no longer will need to write in Albanian to him. -- DaJeweller ( talk) 22:13, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
The announcement was made by the Italian Football Federation's chairman and the news appeared this morning (USA ET time) in Italian newspapers. However, it now seems that there was a misunderstanding: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/131115/football-uefa-denies-san-siro-host-2016-champions-league It looks like no decision will be made until spring 2014. Thanks. Angelo Somaschini ( talk) 19:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey
I would like to say thanks for fixing the article, I do appreciate it very much! I know it's something wrong and I was unsure how to fix it, so... Thanks!
Hisakiwa21 ( talk) 21:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
You, idiot, what was not constructive in my edit to 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Second Round? Please think first before making such statements. Moron! -- 5.248.190.165 ( talk) 23:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You left a message on my talk page several hours ago. I just watched the match today and at the time of the goal it was about 81:35. I didn't look at any other source at the time of the edit. I just found | this source that claims 82' but I'm not sure whether it qualifies as reliable. The whole issue is not that important to me so feel free to keep it or change it if you want. Martinkunev ( talk) 23:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
I have reinstated the list of qualifiers that I had added, but which you reverted. Note that I have added the list in a different way. If you still feel the list should not be in the article, I hope you will engage at Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Clear statement of who qualified with your explanation. (Unfortunately you did not add provide an explanation for your reversion, so I have no idea why you did that.)-- A bit iffy ( talk) 12:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
No worries. The file was on Wikimedia Commons, so it was just a case of finding the image page on Commons and reverting to the correct version. Cheers. – Pee Jay 23:36, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry for disturbing you again. Thank you for participating in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next matchday scenarios. I have proposed a conclusion that addresses your concern regarding reliable sources and routine calculations. Unfortunately, you haven't replied to my questions regarding CRYSTAL, so couldn't take your position on board. Would appreciate a comment. Ivan Volodin ( talk) 10:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Im sorry, its my first try on wiki, but why you revert a correct changes that guy do? This group indeed have all teams able to pass through by now, math make it this way. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 22:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
You might have been right to revert my edit, but I think twinkle was already not working. I was trying to fix it, actually. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 23:34, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
On this link they have "FC Chornomorets Odesa 2-1 GNK Dinamo Zagreb A last-gasp Anatoliy Didenko goal gave the Russian side their first home win and set up a final-day decider against PSV Eindhoven." What mean what either they can do mistakes too, or Odessa was captured by Russia from Ukraine last few hours and it went unnoticed.
If Freiburg will win 3-0 or more and Slovan will win Estoril Sevilla will be out, and if Sevilla will beat Freiburg and Estoril will win Slovan with more away goals for Estoril in result they will be second was they outperform both Slovan and Freiburg in this case in head-to-head matches.
I dont mean anything bad, just trying to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 22:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I meant theyr main page link, with article about other match between Ukrainian and Croatian team claimed to be won by Russian team, they fixed it already, but i have a printscreen in case of any interest. So lets see head to head Se-F 2:0 (x:y), in case of 0:3 or more fo F they outperform Se in head to head, and Se-Sl 1:1 and 1:1, in case of F win the needed difference Sl will be also higher than Se by goal difference. Sl-E 2:1 and (x:y), in case of E outperform Sl to have a better head-to-head (any win with more than 1 goal difference or 1:0) they are overtake them, and F-E 1:1 and 0:0, so they are better in this case aswell. Surely i can have some mistake slipped in too, so i hope it will settle someway on UEFAsite soon in any case. Thanks for responses. 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 23:39, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I did it, so i didnt put a matches against E in case of Se and of Se in case of E above. When you remove them it looks as Se possible have worst result in case of right F win, and also E have the best in case of own right win and F lose: example, Se-F 0:3; E-Sl 0-1
Se 7-7 9 Se-F 2:0; 0:3 F>Se head to head; Se-Sl 1:1; 1:1 Sl>Se on goal diff 7-7 vs 8-7
F 8-6 9 F-Sl 2:2, 2:1 F>Sl
Sl 8-7 9
E-Sl 2:0 Se-F 2:0
E 4-4 6 E-F 0:0; 1:1, E>F head to head; E-Sl 1:2; 2:0 E>Sl head to head
F 5-8 6 F-Sl 2:2, 2:1 F>Sl
Sl 7-9 6
Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 00:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Oh, great thanks, i managed to found mistake on my own, sorry for such disturb. Se 0 3 1 1 0 x 5+x
F 1 0 0 0 3 y 4+y
Sl 1 0 1 1 0 0 3+0
F 1 0 1 1 3 0 6+0
Sl 1 3 0 0 0 x 4+x
E 0 0 1 1 0 y 2+y — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 00:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
# | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Dif | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Freiburg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 7 |
2 | Sevilla | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | –1 | 5 |
3 | Slovan | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
Yes, great thanks again, initially im stupidly stumbled upon head-to-head results while skipping the first tiebraker, but at least not only me did that mistake, great what there is people like you to check and recheck. Regards man, and sorry again if created any nuisance, keep it running great! 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 00:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Trust me, I watched the game, I am from Romania
Here is a link and you cand click on the video so you can see if there were 50k spectators: http://www.digisport.ro/Sport/FOTBAL/Competitii/Champions+League/live-text/VIDEO+Steaua+-+Schalke+26.11.13+
There were less then 10k, and UEFA made an error
Regards
Today I noticed a grammatical error in the phrase "Since 2006 Mason is on the list of Select Group Referees ..." on Lee Mason's page. I thought I would help by changing the phrase to "Since 2006 Mason has been on the list of Select Group Referees ...".
You have reverted this stating that I needed to provide a reference. Yet you have not deleted the grammatically incorrect, unreferenced version. I don't get how you think that reverting grammatical improvements helps the encyclopaedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki-c4m3lo ( talk • contribs) 12:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
I was under the impression that DataCo lost the case regarding copyrighting fixture lists. ( http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/march1/football-fixture-lists-free-to-publish-following-ecj-ruling-expert-says/) Presumably given you've removed them twice, the UK High Court ruled against ECJ? Not doubting you but just wondering if you had a link to what was officially decided. 90.211.69.44 ( talk) 15:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Once a team lost in Champions league in Qualifying Phase, they are automatically transferred to Europa League. Uefa co-oefficient takes Europa league in account also.So how come spain lost one team out of 7 in Current ranking table. Could you specify which team is out of both league. I am responding through IP adress. If you want to reach me, reach me through KAS( talk) ... 111.92.10.222 ( talk) 11:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello mate. Can you please talk to the user called Gsfelipe94 because he is adding livescores to 2013 FIFA Club World Cup which should not exist before matches are finished.-- 85.165.20.80 ( talk) 21:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you and Good luck.-- 85.165.20.80 ( talk) 21:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure what your issue with my edit is. I added "official" sources - as in the club releases from CSKA and Milan - does that not meet your standards of "official"? Jxp ( talk) 01:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Qed237 ! Thanks a lot for your award to me ! I really appreciate it :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usman afif ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
oops Victuallers ( talk) 12:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Holiday Cheer | |
Victuallers
talkback is wishing QED Season's Greetings! Thanks, this is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote
WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. -
Vic/Roger inspired by this - you could do the same |
Hi mate I'm not too sure what was wrong with my edit on this page previously, my source was the UEFA regulations ( http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/Regulations/uefaorg/Regulations/02/03/92/81/2039281_DOWNLOAD.pdf), of which I regularly quoted. I may have indeed forgot to mention one source right at the end but I'll add this in in the future.
(Hope this posts correctly!) Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by HatterAlex ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Calm down, it was a mistake. Needless reaction if I may say so. Stevo1000 ( talk) 23:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for trying to encourage the correct updating of the timestamp in footballers' infoboxes. Perhaps you're unaware that the important thing is for the timestamp to be set to a date/time at which the stats are unambiguously correct, i.e. after the end of the player's last game and before their (or their club's) next, and not necessarily the date/time at which the update was made. As it says at the bottom of the box, "correct as of" ..., not "updated at". Although most people use the five-tildes method to generate the current date/time, that isn't a requirement.
Since the anon 86.21.101.81 returned from their short block, they have in all cases changed the timestamp to a date/time at which the stats are unambiguously correct. I'll let them know about the five tildes thing, looks like no-one has yet.
Perhaps you may want to consider removing your warning to the anon, seeing as this time, they haven't actually done anything wrong. cheers, Struway2 ( talk) 09:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, could you please explain why you made this edit? The reason you gave in the edit summary was "No live updates" but both edits were on 14 January and Manchester City did not play on 14 January. -- Jaellee ( talk) 23:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
No problem, the mistake was not really huge and it's easily fixed. I was just wondering if there was something I missed like reverting edits from a known vandal IP or something like that. -- Jaellee ( talk) 23:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Good spot and many thanks for the catch and the advice. SPACKlick ( talk) 14:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
ESSIEN MOVE AGREED WITH MILAN: Chelsea Football Club and AC Milan have reached an agreement for the transfer of Michael Essien to the Serie A side.
Essien has travelled to Italy and the completion of the move is subject to him agreeing personal terms with Milan and passing a medical examination.
Sorce: http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/3636995 (chelsea fc official website) Ahmadre147 ( talk) 16:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I don't know what you mean by updating the helper template. Can you please tell me? Thanks -- Skyblueshaun ( talk) 23:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Man Utd have confirmed Mata's number on their website. Surprised you didn't check there first :-P – Pee Jay 19:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Qed237 - no of course we shouldn't do it for every player. It's just, as something of a devout CFC fan and Wiki contributor for a while, and a real fan (with a passion) for Mata, I saw little harm in a subtle acknowledgement. Apologies. - UB22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnknownBrick22 ( talk • contribs) 00:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
How come there's an English flag next to Cardiff City on the Trinidad & Tobago National Football team page(by Kenwyne Jones)? They have the Welsh flag next to their name in everywhere on here so why different on that page?..-- 2.100.119.17 ( talk) 17:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Luis Suarez scored 23 goals, Daniel Sturridge scored 13 goals and Simon Mignolet kept seven clean sheets, these are facts so how are they not constructive? unless you care to do it yourself. - User:Deadpool1992 02:45, 29 January 2014
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi! You reverted my edit without any comments and any reason therefore I will also reverted. I gave source and I wrote correctly. Your attitide is very strange for me. - Csurla ( talk) 19:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
As I said she is Hungarian citizenship and also Hungarians. - Csurla ( talk) 20:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Amikor rákérdeznek, mindig magyarnak vallom magamat. Szeretek otthon lenni, szeretem Magyarországot, mindig nagyon jól érzem ott magamat, de itt élek. A németeknek focizom, de ettől még magyar lány vagyok. Az Európa-bajnokság alatt és a döntő megnyerése után az interneten és a közösségi oldalakon elmondhatatlanul sok biztatást és gratulációt kaptam otthonról ismeretlen emberektől. Talán nem is tudják, milyen sokat számított, mennyi erőt adott, hogy Magyarországon is ennyien szurkolnak nekem…
She is so Hungarian, then she speaks in Hungarian. - Csurla ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello. I have a problem with Infobox football biography at Taulant Xhaka. User:Huligan0 did a change there, by puting his start of professional career with the reserve squad of Basel without mading his first debut with the first team of Basel (In 2010 he made it first debut with Basel and User made it as 2008- with reserve team). I reverted once, he reverted once again. So what should we do, who's correct version, mine or him ? Eni.Sukthi.Durres ( talk) 20:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Your recent editing history at 2013–14 Liverpool F.C. season shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mentoz86 ( talk) 16:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Mentoz is correct, edit warring to make a 'correct' edit is still edit warring. You need to use the talk page. Giant Snowman 08:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Yes I was edit warring I realze that. But I still dont know what "another source" some of the others were using. They just changed the numbers but without sourcing it, and to me that is disruptive editing. You cant say it is correct for them to change without refering to a source. QED237 (talk) 10:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Regulations state that if teams are tied, classification is conducted between them. Montenegro won't be able to play Ukraine any more and are 1-4 in GD between them. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 21:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
The ranking in each group is determined as follows: [1]
If two or more teams are equal on the basis of the above three criteria, their rankings shall be determined as follows:
There. Aleksandr Grigoryev ( talk) 21:29, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
EXACTLY. What does b) say? Please read b) again... =) QED237 (talk) 21:30, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
How were my edits at 2013–14 Reading F.C. season unconstructive and disruptive. Including players promoted from academy as "transfers" is WP:NOTSTATS and do not belong in that article. As for the Matchday Sqauds section at the Everton season page I fail to see how that is disruptive. I feel this warning is very harsh and will consider requesting its removal. 109.149.0.41 ( talk) 12:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the situation regarding the Czech Republic. I had overlooked the worst runner-up scenario! Woodlandscaley ( talk) 22:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for undoing the vandalism on the page. Was about to do it myself. Anyway we can make the page semi-protected to prevent further vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krzy32 ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Tottenham Hotspur F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Kane ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 20:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Can you please show me where the consensus was reached not to include matchday scenarios? Ivan Volodin ( talk) 14:52, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
hi there,i tried changing this because its in correct..henrik Larsson scored 59 European goals in total during his carer most of which were in the lower European competition the Europa league or as it was known when he was playing the uefa cup..these are different competitions from the uefa champions league where in fact henrik larrsson scored I think 5 or 6 goals a long way from 59.he does not deserve to be there as im sure you willnow be aware of,you could probably check this from one of wikis pages on henrik Larsson its clear on that page thanks,thomas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.28.23.227 ( talk) 21:15, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
With all due respect, I understand you're only being officious, but I'm only updating appearances not providing live data pertaining to the actual match result. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TLWC1905 ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Yes mate updating the, appearances, goals, top goalscorer chart, booking/red card chart, league table etc. should wait until the matches are over in my view as it is still under the live updates. Skyblueshaun ( talk) 22:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey, Hello , i am understand, not problems. Ionel141 ( talk) 13:14, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, No problem always happy to help. Transfermarkt is definitely not a reliable source as it is edited by the public and not accurate. If I am honest I haven't heard of the other source. But I would suggest that you leave a message on his/her's talkpage to say your reason why. If he/she continues to re-vert or undo your change of source then let me know the user name. Skyblueshaun ( talk) 17:34, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
I removed the live scores. Why are you going after me for that? -- Kitch ( Talk : Contrib) 17:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Can't wait, eh? Some people are busy in real life at times and it can take time to answer, don't like your tone...
Look at the FIFA World Cup articles or UEFA Euro ones, those have kits included. I did not check the other articles from the previous years because i only know "those" (FIFA/UEFA ones, was not talking about the playoff matches only...) matches WITH kits. Still i think you should started it but that does not matter. We can take it to Footy, i will comment there and see what happens. I'm not THAT into it, to follow it daily or so and live with the result(s). Tell me one thing, what's so bad about having the kits there?
P.S.: Somehow i don't like your acting on wikipedia, but maybe that's just me (and should not affect anything). Kante4 ( talk) 20:32, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
I'll be reporting him soon for edit warring anyways, and I no longer will need to write in Albanian to him. -- DaJeweller ( talk) 22:13, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
The announcement was made by the Italian Football Federation's chairman and the news appeared this morning (USA ET time) in Italian newspapers. However, it now seems that there was a misunderstanding: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/afp/131115/football-uefa-denies-san-siro-host-2016-champions-league It looks like no decision will be made until spring 2014. Thanks. Angelo Somaschini ( talk) 19:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey
I would like to say thanks for fixing the article, I do appreciate it very much! I know it's something wrong and I was unsure how to fix it, so... Thanks!
Hisakiwa21 ( talk) 21:30, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
You, idiot, what was not constructive in my edit to 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – UEFA Second Round? Please think first before making such statements. Moron! -- 5.248.190.165 ( talk) 23:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello. You left a message on my talk page several hours ago. I just watched the match today and at the time of the goal it was about 81:35. I didn't look at any other source at the time of the edit. I just found | this source that claims 82' but I'm not sure whether it qualifies as reliable. The whole issue is not that important to me so feel free to keep it or change it if you want. Martinkunev ( talk) 23:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
I have reinstated the list of qualifiers that I had added, but which you reverted. Note that I have added the list in a different way. If you still feel the list should not be in the article, I hope you will engage at Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)#Clear statement of who qualified with your explanation. (Unfortunately you did not add provide an explanation for your reversion, so I have no idea why you did that.)-- A bit iffy ( talk) 12:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
No worries. The file was on Wikimedia Commons, so it was just a case of finding the image page on Commons and reverting to the correct version. Cheers. – Pee Jay 23:36, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Sorry for disturbing you again. Thank you for participating in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Next matchday scenarios. I have proposed a conclusion that addresses your concern regarding reliable sources and routine calculations. Unfortunately, you haven't replied to my questions regarding CRYSTAL, so couldn't take your position on board. Would appreciate a comment. Ivan Volodin ( talk) 10:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Im sorry, its my first try on wiki, but why you revert a correct changes that guy do? This group indeed have all teams able to pass through by now, math make it this way. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 22:32, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
You might have been right to revert my edit, but I think twinkle was already not working. I was trying to fix it, actually. FreeKnowledgeCreator ( talk) 23:34, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
On this link they have "FC Chornomorets Odesa 2-1 GNK Dinamo Zagreb A last-gasp Anatoliy Didenko goal gave the Russian side their first home win and set up a final-day decider against PSV Eindhoven." What mean what either they can do mistakes too, or Odessa was captured by Russia from Ukraine last few hours and it went unnoticed.
If Freiburg will win 3-0 or more and Slovan will win Estoril Sevilla will be out, and if Sevilla will beat Freiburg and Estoril will win Slovan with more away goals for Estoril in result they will be second was they outperform both Slovan and Freiburg in this case in head-to-head matches.
I dont mean anything bad, just trying to help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 22:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I meant theyr main page link, with article about other match between Ukrainian and Croatian team claimed to be won by Russian team, they fixed it already, but i have a printscreen in case of any interest. So lets see head to head Se-F 2:0 (x:y), in case of 0:3 or more fo F they outperform Se in head to head, and Se-Sl 1:1 and 1:1, in case of F win the needed difference Sl will be also higher than Se by goal difference. Sl-E 2:1 and (x:y), in case of E outperform Sl to have a better head-to-head (any win with more than 1 goal difference or 1:0) they are overtake them, and F-E 1:1 and 0:0, so they are better in this case aswell. Surely i can have some mistake slipped in too, so i hope it will settle someway on UEFAsite soon in any case. Thanks for responses. 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 23:39, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
I did it, so i didnt put a matches against E in case of Se and of Se in case of E above. When you remove them it looks as Se possible have worst result in case of right F win, and also E have the best in case of own right win and F lose: example, Se-F 0:3; E-Sl 0-1
Se 7-7 9 Se-F 2:0; 0:3 F>Se head to head; Se-Sl 1:1; 1:1 Sl>Se on goal diff 7-7 vs 8-7
F 8-6 9 F-Sl 2:2, 2:1 F>Sl
Sl 8-7 9
E-Sl 2:0 Se-F 2:0
E 4-4 6 E-F 0:0; 1:1, E>F head to head; E-Sl 1:2; 2:0 E>Sl head to head
F 5-8 6 F-Sl 2:2, 2:1 F>Sl
Sl 7-9 6
Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 00:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Oh, great thanks, i managed to found mistake on my own, sorry for such disturb. Se 0 3 1 1 0 x 5+x
F 1 0 0 0 3 y 4+y
Sl 1 0 1 1 0 0 3+0
F 1 0 1 1 3 0 6+0
Sl 1 3 0 0 0 x 4+x
E 0 0 1 1 0 y 2+y — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 00:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
# | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Dif | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Freiburg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 7 |
2 | Sevilla | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | –1 | 5 |
3 | Slovan | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 3 |
Yes, great thanks again, initially im stupidly stumbled upon head-to-head results while skipping the first tiebraker, but at least not only me did that mistake, great what there is people like you to check and recheck. Regards man, and sorry again if created any nuisance, keep it running great! 81.200.30.29 ( talk) 00:40, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Trust me, I watched the game, I am from Romania
Here is a link and you cand click on the video so you can see if there were 50k spectators: http://www.digisport.ro/Sport/FOTBAL/Competitii/Champions+League/live-text/VIDEO+Steaua+-+Schalke+26.11.13+
There were less then 10k, and UEFA made an error
Regards
Today I noticed a grammatical error in the phrase "Since 2006 Mason is on the list of Select Group Referees ..." on Lee Mason's page. I thought I would help by changing the phrase to "Since 2006 Mason has been on the list of Select Group Referees ...".
You have reverted this stating that I needed to provide a reference. Yet you have not deleted the grammatically incorrect, unreferenced version. I don't get how you think that reverting grammatical improvements helps the encyclopaedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki-c4m3lo ( talk • contribs) 12:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
I was under the impression that DataCo lost the case regarding copyrighting fixture lists. ( http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/march1/football-fixture-lists-free-to-publish-following-ecj-ruling-expert-says/) Presumably given you've removed them twice, the UK High Court ruled against ECJ? Not doubting you but just wondering if you had a link to what was officially decided. 90.211.69.44 ( talk) 15:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
Once a team lost in Champions league in Qualifying Phase, they are automatically transferred to Europa League. Uefa co-oefficient takes Europa league in account also.So how come spain lost one team out of 7 in Current ranking table. Could you specify which team is out of both league. I am responding through IP adress. If you want to reach me, reach me through KAS( talk) ... 111.92.10.222 ( talk) 11:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello mate. Can you please talk to the user called Gsfelipe94 because he is adding livescores to 2013 FIFA Club World Cup which should not exist before matches are finished.-- 85.165.20.80 ( talk) 21:15, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you and Good luck.-- 85.165.20.80 ( talk) 21:37, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure what your issue with my edit is. I added "official" sources - as in the club releases from CSKA and Milan - does that not meet your standards of "official"? Jxp ( talk) 01:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Qed237 ! Thanks a lot for your award to me ! I really appreciate it :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usman afif ( talk • contribs) 02:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
oops Victuallers ( talk) 12:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Holiday Cheer | |
Victuallers
talkback is wishing QED Season's Greetings! Thanks, this is just to celebrate the holiday season and promote
WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. -
Vic/Roger inspired by this - you could do the same |
Hi mate I'm not too sure what was wrong with my edit on this page previously, my source was the UEFA regulations ( http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/Regulations/uefaorg/Regulations/02/03/92/81/2039281_DOWNLOAD.pdf), of which I regularly quoted. I may have indeed forgot to mention one source right at the end but I'll add this in in the future.
(Hope this posts correctly!) Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by HatterAlex ( talk • contribs) 12:59, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Calm down, it was a mistake. Needless reaction if I may say so. Stevo1000 ( talk) 23:51, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for trying to encourage the correct updating of the timestamp in footballers' infoboxes. Perhaps you're unaware that the important thing is for the timestamp to be set to a date/time at which the stats are unambiguously correct, i.e. after the end of the player's last game and before their (or their club's) next, and not necessarily the date/time at which the update was made. As it says at the bottom of the box, "correct as of" ..., not "updated at". Although most people use the five-tildes method to generate the current date/time, that isn't a requirement.
Since the anon 86.21.101.81 returned from their short block, they have in all cases changed the timestamp to a date/time at which the stats are unambiguously correct. I'll let them know about the five tildes thing, looks like no-one has yet.
Perhaps you may want to consider removing your warning to the anon, seeing as this time, they haven't actually done anything wrong. cheers, Struway2 ( talk) 09:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, could you please explain why you made this edit? The reason you gave in the edit summary was "No live updates" but both edits were on 14 January and Manchester City did not play on 14 January. -- Jaellee ( talk) 23:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
No problem, the mistake was not really huge and it's easily fixed. I was just wondering if there was something I missed like reverting edits from a known vandal IP or something like that. -- Jaellee ( talk) 23:29, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Good spot and many thanks for the catch and the advice. SPACKlick ( talk) 14:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
ESSIEN MOVE AGREED WITH MILAN: Chelsea Football Club and AC Milan have reached an agreement for the transfer of Michael Essien to the Serie A side.
Essien has travelled to Italy and the completion of the move is subject to him agreeing personal terms with Milan and passing a medical examination.
Sorce: http://www.chelseafc.com/news-article/article/3636995 (chelsea fc official website) Ahmadre147 ( talk) 16:00, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I don't know what you mean by updating the helper template. Can you please tell me? Thanks -- Skyblueshaun ( talk) 23:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Man Utd have confirmed Mata's number on their website. Surprised you didn't check there first :-P – Pee Jay 19:48, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi Qed237 - no of course we shouldn't do it for every player. It's just, as something of a devout CFC fan and Wiki contributor for a while, and a real fan (with a passion) for Mata, I saw little harm in a subtle acknowledgement. Apologies. - UB22 — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnknownBrick22 ( talk • contribs) 00:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
How come there's an English flag next to Cardiff City on the Trinidad & Tobago National Football team page(by Kenwyne Jones)? They have the Welsh flag next to their name in everywhere on here so why different on that page?..-- 2.100.119.17 ( talk) 17:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Luis Suarez scored 23 goals, Daniel Sturridge scored 13 goals and Simon Mignolet kept seven clean sheets, these are facts so how are they not constructive? unless you care to do it yourself. - User:Deadpool1992 02:45, 29 January 2014
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi! You reverted my edit without any comments and any reason therefore I will also reverted. I gave source and I wrote correctly. Your attitide is very strange for me. - Csurla ( talk) 19:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
As I said she is Hungarian citizenship and also Hungarians. - Csurla ( talk) 20:02, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Amikor rákérdeznek, mindig magyarnak vallom magamat. Szeretek otthon lenni, szeretem Magyarországot, mindig nagyon jól érzem ott magamat, de itt élek. A németeknek focizom, de ettől még magyar lány vagyok. Az Európa-bajnokság alatt és a döntő megnyerése után az interneten és a közösségi oldalakon elmondhatatlanul sok biztatást és gratulációt kaptam otthonról ismeretlen emberektől. Talán nem is tudják, milyen sokat számított, mennyi erőt adott, hogy Magyarországon is ennyien szurkolnak nekem…
She is so Hungarian, then she speaks in Hungarian. - Csurla ( talk) 20:49, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello. I have a problem with Infobox football biography at Taulant Xhaka. User:Huligan0 did a change there, by puting his start of professional career with the reserve squad of Basel without mading his first debut with the first team of Basel (In 2010 he made it first debut with Basel and User made it as 2008- with reserve team). I reverted once, he reverted once again. So what should we do, who's correct version, mine or him ? Eni.Sukthi.Durres ( talk) 20:39, 3 February 2014 (UTC)