![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | → | Archive 25 |
Why did you delete my edits on Brad Jones carrer they were accurate and correct as he played his first game today Jamiekg88 ( talk) 21:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
What about the rest ?? The fact he played his first game today — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiekg88 ( talk • contribs) 21:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC) Since you clearly don't go on facts I will be writing about all this in my artical in a uk national news paper and I will advise no one edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiekg88 ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Since worryingly I can't delete something I wrote on your wall can you please remove as 1 I have a right to and 2 more to the point I know where I went wrong now thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiekg88 ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thank you I do have one question before it is archived how I add a source when I try it added a bog standard link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiekg88 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, Could you elaborate more on what you mean by my edit not being constructive? Defman30 ( talk) 15:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
I really respect you, because you have more time than me as an editor. But you are calling Time.com unreliable. All Time's articles are blogs but that 's still the most reliable source in the world. I really can't understand how you can call unreliable an article of the most readed magazine in the world and written by a journalist. It's not even a blog because it's not a discussion of normal people around the world, it's an article because it's written only by a journalist and normal people can't writte on it. Pleaase see for your self and I hope you understand. Jjapanesitalianbritish ( talk) 05:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Glad we got the St. Jakob-Park issue sorted out. Meanwhile, I note you have used rollback on a large number of my corrections. The wiki article on rollback says "Use of standard rollback for any other purposes – such as reverting good-faith changes which you happen to disagree with – is likely to be considered misuse of the tool. When in doubt, use another method of reversion and supply an edit summary to explain your reasoning". As far as I can see, you did not give any summary of the reason for using rollback.
In addition, you have freely conceded that you don't know much about the subject you rolled back (saints).
I therefore hope you will on reflection agree that rollback was not the right way to proceed in this case, and I invite you to revert the rollback. Thank you. Tdls ( talk) 17:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Why did you revert my modifications to the FC Basel page? They were all correct and up to date. How is it possible that Wikipedia is still using an 11 year old logo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisixx ( talk • contribs) 12:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
|clubname=
should be the name of the article and secondly the logo you added was just uploaded and I could not see any copyright-message (saying it was a free logo), so not sure it can be included.
Qed237
(talk)
17:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Hello. Why did you revert my correction to the name of St James's Park? I explained my reasons, you didn't explain yours. And, of course, the park is very obviously not named after St Jacob, who was a 19th-century missionary in Alaska. I am curious. Tdls ( talk) 10:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to everyone for their input. I think we have a solution, as proposed by Floquenbeam. The stadium is neither St James not St Jacob. It is not named after any saint. It is named after a former village, St. Jakob. There is no need to translate the name. In fact, it would be wrong to translate is, since place names are not translatable (with a few obvious exceptions for international cities like London or Geneva. Or of course Basel). I therefore propose to use the sourced name, in its German form (with a dot, and with a k, and with a hyphen, German punctuation is very different from English) and will add an explanation of where the name comes from, translated from the German wiki article. Everyone happy? Tdls ( talk) 14:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Qed237! Could u please help me in entering a refernce to a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The spectactor ( talk • contribs)
What are you doing editing long-standing information on the Sir Alex Ferguson page as well as sourced information into unsourced information on the Levski article? A citation was required to list 70-whatever trophies you pretend they have, it wasnt found, so an accurate official source was used as an edit and a further editor agreed. You have no business making these changes and will be reported if you persist. Davefelmer ( talk) 01:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I am not quite sure how to sign at bottom of posts as I am very new to wiki. Secondly, I am not trying to edit war but rather have a duscussion with other editors. Sometimes when I go onto their talk page and post comments to start a discussion, they are merely deleted as if never posted and so I dont get anywhere. All changes I make I try to do with reliable sourcing and facts. For example, with the Levski article, I listed the need for a citation next to the stated trophy haul, gave it 10 days and then when nothing was found, removed the information and replaced it with the best official sourcing. Why do you persist on editing it back to the unsourced information? Davefelmer ( talk) 16:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Qed237,
According to the Premier League Goal Accreditation Panel, the goal scored by Eden Hazard against Arsenal was credited to Calum Chambers as own goal. You can check it. As of October 3, 2015, Eden Hazard has 0 Premier League goals. Verify it and change it yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjunk6 ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, You had it right the first time. :) 8 games is correct. Regards, Eagleash ( talk) 14:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Help to develop this page, 2015–16 KHL season — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.110.7.147 ( talk) 19:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I Don't understand what's wrong with editing 2015 A Lyga table. I'm lithuanian and I watch all A Lyga matches and update table correctly after them. I Watch them at futbolo.tv so I know the results , goals and who scored right after match. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SurioLazdele ( talk • contribs) 08:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
HI, this Dk.ar.yr. I am thankful to you that you have been helped me correct my mistakes. As I am new here, I wasn't able to understand what was the problem with edit(s) in 2015-16 premier league page. I am sorry,if I made some error and i would be grateful if you could please help to know my mistake in that Page. Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dk.ar.yr ( talk • contribs) 17:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
I noticed your revert on Template:Fb rbr footer. I'm happy to leave it as it is but I don't see how "Extra space was added" as you wrote in the summary. I'm looking at both versions now and cannot see any extra space caused by my edit. Please clarify. Jodosma (talk) 22:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
You send me a message that I've made some mistakes in editing the page named "Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group A table".You told me that I am unfamiliar with the wiki policies and guidelines. Then, You reverted the edition. However, I disagree with what you did yesterday. First of all, I wanna let you know that I started to edit this page at about 6 p.m. on Oct.5 (UTC+8). Before my edition, I noticed that this table was not correct. Because on FIFA.com, the game between Malaysia and Saudi Arabia on Sept.8 have a final result and the final score is 0-3, the match was forfeited because of the violent action from the home fans. After that, I noticed that the wiki page was not updated yet and the result was still written "ABD". So I have to update this information. The reason why I edit many time is because when I am editting the page, the website told me that some other users was also editing this template and that user disagree with my edition! So I had to edit it again. Now, you can view the page "2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC)". That table is same as what I edited. USERS ALL AGREE WITH MY CORRECTION.
WHO'S RIGHT AND WHO'S WORONG??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zwq950117 ( talk • contribs) 06:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Qed237. I see that you have changed some of the information that I myself have changed on the article. You should be able to spot that Tottenham Hotspur have in fact been on a seven game unbeaten streak, after their 2-2 draw with Swansea on 4 October 2015. Also, Eric Dier received his fifth yellow card of the season and this was also listed by me on this article. I would ask you to change my edits back because the information that you changed is now, as of 4th October 2015, incorrect. Sean0254. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean0254 ( talk • contribs) 19:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
OK. Thanks for clearing that up. Sean0254 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean0254 ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. 13:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)– Gilliam ( talk)
Please WP:IAR regards Klopp and stop edit warring. He is the next Liverpool manager. JMHamo ( talk) 15:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey Qed237, I realize you get a lot of unsourced edits but that edit was sourced - In the 'Personnel and Kits' section it states that all the manager references are handled by this page List of English Football League managers which Klopp is indeed on, with a reference. Thanks, TZealot ( talk) 20:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
I think that's the first time I've been thanked for an edit (this one on the 2018 FIFA WCQ AFC 2nd round group C table). Really made me feel good, and you're welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PsyMar ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Qed237, take note that i have reverted Radamel Falcao's page to the original copy that doesn't have any signs of vandalism. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lpy4606 ( talk • contribs) 16:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the bad editing. My bad. Jjd89 ( talk) 19:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about my confusion about Turkey, you're absolutely right. Jeppiz ( talk) 18:32, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Why Turkey in the table with status Y? No one else but Turks! In my opinion Turkey has also Z. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redmir ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
If the current third-placed team has no chances of qualifying, nor, in this case, do the teams above. They are all gonna have the same maximum potential points if they finish third as the current third-placed teams, unless they have a worse record against 6th ranked teams (which they don't in this case). OlJa 23:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, and I am sorry for editing without taking every possibilities into consideration. :) Centaur271188 ( talk) 12:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
. To all of you, you don't have to ping a user if you are writing on their talk page. They will receive a notification that a message has been posted on their talk page anyway. T v x1 22:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, my edit is needed because, as I said in my justificatory comment, at that point UEFA's wording, as originally given, isn't as meaningful (& so helpful to the reader) as it is when it is read in conjunction with the clause I inserted ("(e.g. three teams tied on points get whittled down to two)").
As you didn't give an explanation for your action please say below why you think my revision doesn't help the reader understand straightaway the repetition involved in applying criterion 5.
As a reminder, this is the whole passage constituting criterion 5 as amended by myself:
"If, after having applied criteria 1 to 4, teams still have an equal ranking (e.g. three teams tied on points get whittled down to two), criteria 1 to 4 are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the teams in question to determine their final rankings. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 6 to 10 apply;"
As you didn't offer a reason for deleting my edit I have been rational & put it back in.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.91.251.174 ( talk) 12:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
We follow substantive rationality, not formal rationality: if official wording is not readily intelligible then it is rational to add wording that makes it easier for readers to grasp the intended meaning.
This is not a matter of personal opinion: we act rationally in terms of the substance at hand. Here the substance is making it plain why, counter-intuitively, a set of criteria need to be re-applied in particular circumstances (e.g., in the second instance to 2 teams when in the first instance they were applied to 3 or more teams). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.91.251.174 ( talk) 21:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The information on the Curacao page is wrong, if you check the references on the players profile FIFA.com, National-Football-Teams etc. He now plays for CSD Barber since the beginning of this season. Not Centro. Caps were also not up to date. ( Subzzee ( talk) 13:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC))
Ukraine should be second as their goal difference is superior to that of Slovakia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fungusandfurball ( talk • contribs)
Can you help editing the seasons here : EMF miniEURO. Thank you.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 08:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
You've twice reverted 82.132.233.163 ( talk · contribs) at the article The Indian in the Cupboard. I don't understand why. Both categories added ( Category:Works about Native Americans and Category:Native Americans in popular culture) would seem to apply to the novel. Why did you remove them? — fourthords | =Λ= | 14:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Well done for all your editing on this - you've done a great job keeping us all in order! This 'week of football' makes qualifying more entertaining but it does drag out the various permutations of future scenarios and annotations... Super Nintendo Chalmers ( talk) 09:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't realize there was a rule against live updates during games. Now the matches have finished I trust that you will reinstate my hard work? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.89.105.208 ( talk) 20:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Please refer to WP:INFOBOXFLAG, namely this passage: "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many". Thanks, Mattythewhite ( talk) 21:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
HI. I created many article , I just want help me ? Kurdistantolive ( talk) 14:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Dear Qed237, recently I spent some time to give an extra value to the pages of some footballers representing their national teams at "major" international championships. In football, it's pretty clearly separated, you either have youth, friendly or major competitions, like the World Cup and Continental Championships. Unfortunately, just like that you decided to revert all those edits. Such lists exist at ice hockey players' pages and I think they look good and give a reader a good idea of how a player performed at particular events. I don't see anything wrong in such lists and I feel disappointed that you strached my work "just like that". Ksihoo17:22, 14 October 2015
Seems fine to me! Giant Snowman 16:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
When I go to UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying a blank screen appears on both its article page and its talk page. Submitting an edit is impossible. Is that an issue with my computer or does the same happen to you as well? OlJa 18:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
FYI, I have re-opened an old SPI for FCFanclub1, as I believe it's a sock of Newestcastleman. Please keep an eye out for other socks who edit season articles like this user. Thanks, JMHamo ( talk) 11:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Can you revert please on Copa del Rey, an anonymous deleted the Runners-up. Thanks.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 00:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Qed237. Can you help me in 2015–16 KHL season? 95.110.63.249 ( talk) 16:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Premier League may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Qed237.
Can you help me in 2015–16 Russian National Football League? At this page there is League table in old format. Can you make it in new format? Can you add section of results? GAV80 ( talk) 17:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Qed237.
It's me again. About Template:UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying Group 1 and other groups from 2 to 9. If your open this templates, you'll see under the table red link "Template:UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying group talk" (page does not exist). If you open very similar page 2017 UEFA European Under-21 Championship qualification Group 7, you'll see under table "To edit the group standings and fixtures: Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Runners-up". Can you make also in UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying groups? GAV80 ( talk) 19:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Qed, just wanted to ask you, what do I have to do to revert edits? I've seen alot of vandalism in pages lately and i can't revert the edits like other users do, please help me with this, thank you TheSoccerBoy ( talk) 03:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Do you think that that team will get a UEFA licence for the next season? Last season they were denied one because they were "affiliated with the Latvian Football Federation for less than three years after reforming from the dissolved Liepājas Metalurgs", so would that mean that they wouldn't get a licence until 2017 (since they were affiliated in 2014)? LICA98 ( talk) 12:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day!
![]() |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | → | Archive 25 |
Why did you delete my edits on Brad Jones carrer they were accurate and correct as he played his first game today Jamiekg88 ( talk) 21:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
What about the rest ?? The fact he played his first game today — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiekg88 ( talk • contribs) 21:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC) Since you clearly don't go on facts I will be writing about all this in my artical in a uk national news paper and I will advise no one edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiekg88 ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Since worryingly I can't delete something I wrote on your wall can you please remove as 1 I have a right to and 2 more to the point I know where I went wrong now thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiekg88 ( talk • contribs) 22:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thank you I do have one question before it is archived how I add a source when I try it added a bog standard link — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiekg88 ( talk • contribs)
Hi, Could you elaborate more on what you mean by my edit not being constructive? Defman30 ( talk) 15:44, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
I really respect you, because you have more time than me as an editor. But you are calling Time.com unreliable. All Time's articles are blogs but that 's still the most reliable source in the world. I really can't understand how you can call unreliable an article of the most readed magazine in the world and written by a journalist. It's not even a blog because it's not a discussion of normal people around the world, it's an article because it's written only by a journalist and normal people can't writte on it. Pleaase see for your self and I hope you understand. Jjapanesitalianbritish ( talk) 05:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Glad we got the St. Jakob-Park issue sorted out. Meanwhile, I note you have used rollback on a large number of my corrections. The wiki article on rollback says "Use of standard rollback for any other purposes – such as reverting good-faith changes which you happen to disagree with – is likely to be considered misuse of the tool. When in doubt, use another method of reversion and supply an edit summary to explain your reasoning". As far as I can see, you did not give any summary of the reason for using rollback.
In addition, you have freely conceded that you don't know much about the subject you rolled back (saints).
I therefore hope you will on reflection agree that rollback was not the right way to proceed in this case, and I invite you to revert the rollback. Thank you. Tdls ( talk) 17:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Why did you revert my modifications to the FC Basel page? They were all correct and up to date. How is it possible that Wikipedia is still using an 11 year old logo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisixx ( talk • contribs) 12:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
|clubname=
should be the name of the article and secondly the logo you added was just uploaded and I could not see any copyright-message (saying it was a free logo), so not sure it can be included.
Qed237
(talk)
17:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Hello. Why did you revert my correction to the name of St James's Park? I explained my reasons, you didn't explain yours. And, of course, the park is very obviously not named after St Jacob, who was a 19th-century missionary in Alaska. I am curious. Tdls ( talk) 10:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks to everyone for their input. I think we have a solution, as proposed by Floquenbeam. The stadium is neither St James not St Jacob. It is not named after any saint. It is named after a former village, St. Jakob. There is no need to translate the name. In fact, it would be wrong to translate is, since place names are not translatable (with a few obvious exceptions for international cities like London or Geneva. Or of course Basel). I therefore propose to use the sourced name, in its German form (with a dot, and with a k, and with a hyphen, German punctuation is very different from English) and will add an explanation of where the name comes from, translated from the German wiki article. Everyone happy? Tdls ( talk) 14:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello Qed237! Could u please help me in entering a refernce to a page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The spectactor ( talk • contribs)
What are you doing editing long-standing information on the Sir Alex Ferguson page as well as sourced information into unsourced information on the Levski article? A citation was required to list 70-whatever trophies you pretend they have, it wasnt found, so an accurate official source was used as an edit and a further editor agreed. You have no business making these changes and will be reported if you persist. Davefelmer ( talk) 01:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I am not quite sure how to sign at bottom of posts as I am very new to wiki. Secondly, I am not trying to edit war but rather have a duscussion with other editors. Sometimes when I go onto their talk page and post comments to start a discussion, they are merely deleted as if never posted and so I dont get anywhere. All changes I make I try to do with reliable sourcing and facts. For example, with the Levski article, I listed the need for a citation next to the stated trophy haul, gave it 10 days and then when nothing was found, removed the information and replaced it with the best official sourcing. Why do you persist on editing it back to the unsourced information? Davefelmer ( talk) 16:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi Qed237,
According to the Premier League Goal Accreditation Panel, the goal scored by Eden Hazard against Arsenal was credited to Calum Chambers as own goal. You can check it. As of October 3, 2015, Eden Hazard has 0 Premier League goals. Verify it and change it yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjunk6 ( talk • contribs) 20:44, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, You had it right the first time. :) 8 games is correct. Regards, Eagleash ( talk) 14:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Help to develop this page, 2015–16 KHL season — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.110.7.147 ( talk) 19:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I Don't understand what's wrong with editing 2015 A Lyga table. I'm lithuanian and I watch all A Lyga matches and update table correctly after them. I Watch them at futbolo.tv so I know the results , goals and who scored right after match. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SurioLazdele ( talk • contribs) 08:01, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
HI, this Dk.ar.yr. I am thankful to you that you have been helped me correct my mistakes. As I am new here, I wasn't able to understand what was the problem with edit(s) in 2015-16 premier league page. I am sorry,if I made some error and i would be grateful if you could please help to know my mistake in that Page. Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dk.ar.yr ( talk • contribs) 17:02, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
I noticed your revert on Template:Fb rbr footer. I'm happy to leave it as it is but I don't see how "Extra space was added" as you wrote in the summary. I'm looking at both versions now and cannot see any extra space caused by my edit. Please clarify. Jodosma (talk) 22:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
You send me a message that I've made some mistakes in editing the page named "Template:2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Second Round Group A table".You told me that I am unfamiliar with the wiki policies and guidelines. Then, You reverted the edition. However, I disagree with what you did yesterday. First of all, I wanna let you know that I started to edit this page at about 6 p.m. on Oct.5 (UTC+8). Before my edition, I noticed that this table was not correct. Because on FIFA.com, the game between Malaysia and Saudi Arabia on Sept.8 have a final result and the final score is 0-3, the match was forfeited because of the violent action from the home fans. After that, I noticed that the wiki page was not updated yet and the result was still written "ABD". So I have to update this information. The reason why I edit many time is because when I am editting the page, the website told me that some other users was also editing this template and that user disagree with my edition! So I had to edit it again. Now, you can view the page "2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (AFC)". That table is same as what I edited. USERS ALL AGREE WITH MY CORRECTION.
WHO'S RIGHT AND WHO'S WORONG??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zwq950117 ( talk • contribs) 06:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Qed237. I see that you have changed some of the information that I myself have changed on the article. You should be able to spot that Tottenham Hotspur have in fact been on a seven game unbeaten streak, after their 2-2 draw with Swansea on 4 October 2015. Also, Eric Dier received his fifth yellow card of the season and this was also listed by me on this article. I would ask you to change my edits back because the information that you changed is now, as of 4th October 2015, incorrect. Sean0254. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean0254 ( talk • contribs) 19:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
OK. Thanks for clearing that up. Sean0254 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean0254 ( talk • contribs) 19:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. 13:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)– Gilliam ( talk)
Please WP:IAR regards Klopp and stop edit warring. He is the next Liverpool manager. JMHamo ( talk) 15:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
Hey Qed237, I realize you get a lot of unsourced edits but that edit was sourced - In the 'Personnel and Kits' section it states that all the manager references are handled by this page List of English Football League managers which Klopp is indeed on, with a reference. Thanks, TZealot ( talk) 20:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
I think that's the first time I've been thanked for an edit (this one on the 2018 FIFA WCQ AFC 2nd round group C table). Really made me feel good, and you're welcome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PsyMar ( talk • contribs) 02:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Qed237, take note that i have reverted Radamel Falcao's page to the original copy that doesn't have any signs of vandalism. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lpy4606 ( talk • contribs) 16:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the bad editing. My bad. Jjd89 ( talk) 19:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry about my confusion about Turkey, you're absolutely right. Jeppiz ( talk) 18:32, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Why Turkey in the table with status Y? No one else but Turks! In my opinion Turkey has also Z. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redmir ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
If the current third-placed team has no chances of qualifying, nor, in this case, do the teams above. They are all gonna have the same maximum potential points if they finish third as the current third-placed teams, unless they have a worse record against 6th ranked teams (which they don't in this case). OlJa 23:06, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, and I am sorry for editing without taking every possibilities into consideration. :) Centaur271188 ( talk) 12:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
. To all of you, you don't have to ping a user if you are writing on their talk page. They will receive a notification that a message has been posted on their talk page anyway. T v x1 22:28, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, my edit is needed because, as I said in my justificatory comment, at that point UEFA's wording, as originally given, isn't as meaningful (& so helpful to the reader) as it is when it is read in conjunction with the clause I inserted ("(e.g. three teams tied on points get whittled down to two)").
As you didn't give an explanation for your action please say below why you think my revision doesn't help the reader understand straightaway the repetition involved in applying criterion 5.
As a reminder, this is the whole passage constituting criterion 5 as amended by myself:
"If, after having applied criteria 1 to 4, teams still have an equal ranking (e.g. three teams tied on points get whittled down to two), criteria 1 to 4 are reapplied exclusively to the matches between the teams in question to determine their final rankings. If this procedure does not lead to a decision, criteria 6 to 10 apply;"
As you didn't offer a reason for deleting my edit I have been rational & put it back in.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.91.251.174 ( talk) 12:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
We follow substantive rationality, not formal rationality: if official wording is not readily intelligible then it is rational to add wording that makes it easier for readers to grasp the intended meaning.
This is not a matter of personal opinion: we act rationally in terms of the substance at hand. Here the substance is making it plain why, counter-intuitively, a set of criteria need to be re-applied in particular circumstances (e.g., in the second instance to 2 teams when in the first instance they were applied to 3 or more teams). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.91.251.174 ( talk) 21:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
The information on the Curacao page is wrong, if you check the references on the players profile FIFA.com, National-Football-Teams etc. He now plays for CSD Barber since the beginning of this season. Not Centro. Caps were also not up to date. ( Subzzee ( talk) 13:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC))
Ukraine should be second as their goal difference is superior to that of Slovakia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fungusandfurball ( talk • contribs)
Can you help editing the seasons here : EMF miniEURO. Thank you.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 08:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
You've twice reverted 82.132.233.163 ( talk · contribs) at the article The Indian in the Cupboard. I don't understand why. Both categories added ( Category:Works about Native Americans and Category:Native Americans in popular culture) would seem to apply to the novel. Why did you remove them? — fourthords | =Λ= | 14:21, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Well done for all your editing on this - you've done a great job keeping us all in order! This 'week of football' makes qualifying more entertaining but it does drag out the various permutations of future scenarios and annotations... Super Nintendo Chalmers ( talk) 09:08, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't realize there was a rule against live updates during games. Now the matches have finished I trust that you will reinstate my hard work? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.89.105.208 ( talk) 20:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Please refer to WP:INFOBOXFLAG, namely this passage: "Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many". Thanks, Mattythewhite ( talk) 21:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
HI. I created many article , I just want help me ? Kurdistantolive ( talk) 14:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Dear Qed237, recently I spent some time to give an extra value to the pages of some footballers representing their national teams at "major" international championships. In football, it's pretty clearly separated, you either have youth, friendly or major competitions, like the World Cup and Continental Championships. Unfortunately, just like that you decided to revert all those edits. Such lists exist at ice hockey players' pages and I think they look good and give a reader a good idea of how a player performed at particular events. I don't see anything wrong in such lists and I feel disappointed that you strached my work "just like that". Ksihoo17:22, 14 October 2015
Seems fine to me! Giant Snowman 16:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
When I go to UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying a blank screen appears on both its article page and its talk page. Submitting an edit is impossible. Is that an issue with my computer or does the same happen to you as well? OlJa 18:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_9mNQICjn6DibxNr
This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.
To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:57, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
FYI, I have re-opened an old SPI for FCFanclub1, as I believe it's a sock of Newestcastleman. Please keep an eye out for other socks who edit season articles like this user. Thanks, JMHamo ( talk) 11:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Can you revert please on Copa del Rey, an anonymous deleted the Runners-up. Thanks.-- Alexiulian25 ( talk) 00:17, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Qed237. Can you help me in 2015–16 KHL season? 95.110.63.249 ( talk) 16:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Premier League may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Qed237.
Can you help me in 2015–16 Russian National Football League? At this page there is League table in old format. Can you make it in new format? Can you add section of results? GAV80 ( talk) 17:02, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Qed237.
It's me again. About Template:UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying Group 1 and other groups from 2 to 9. If your open this templates, you'll see under the table red link "Template:UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying group talk" (page does not exist). If you open very similar page 2017 UEFA European Under-21 Championship qualification Group 7, you'll see under table "To edit the group standings and fixtures: Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Runners-up". Can you make also in UEFA Women's Euro 2017 qualifying groups? GAV80 ( talk) 19:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi Qed, just wanted to ask you, what do I have to do to revert edits? I've seen alot of vandalism in pages lately and i can't revert the edits like other users do, please help me with this, thank you TheSoccerBoy ( talk) 03:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Do you think that that team will get a UEFA licence for the next season? Last season they were denied one because they were "affiliated with the Latvian Football Federation for less than three years after reforming from the dissolved Liepājas Metalurgs", so would that mean that they wouldn't get a licence until 2017 (since they were affiliated in 2014)? LICA98 ( talk) 12:01, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day!
![]() |