Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for
advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
19:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Resveratrol Lozenges, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of
Resveratrol Lozenges and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from independent
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
The Sceptical Chymist (
talk)
11:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Stop readding no consensual content in Resveratrol. Thank you.-- Nutriveg ( talk) 20:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Pushroll. Although it may have not been your intent, your article, " Resveratrol Lozenges", read like an advertisement. Here on Wikipedia, we have a policy in which advertising/spam is speedy deleted per deletion criterion G11. Please note that articles for deletion are judged on their own merit, not in comparison to other articles (See WP:OTHERSTUFF). You are certainly welcome to resubmit the article, but please revise the text so that it complies with the policies and guidelines noted at WP:ADS and WP:MOS; otherwise, you run the risk of having the article deleted again. FASTILY (TALK) 23:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
01:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
stop spamming —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.158.242 ( talk) 16:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the
external links you added do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for
advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (
Mabidex (
talk)
23:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC))
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
-- Ronz ( talk) 02:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Resveratrol. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. --
Ronz (
talk)
02:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles . Please cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --
Ronz (
talk)
15:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
WP:DR describes the options for dealing with disputes. WP:NOR/N is probably the best venue for this situation. -- Ronz ( talk) 15:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Again, I encourage you to use proper dispute resolution. -- Ronz ( talk) 16:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Could you reword your comment here per WP:TALK. How about just removing the last sentence? -- Ronz ( talk) 20:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Please
do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
[2] --
Ronz (
talk)
02:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for
advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --
zzuuzz
(talk)
19:30, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Resveratrol Lozenges, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of
Resveratrol Lozenges and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from independent
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
The Sceptical Chymist (
talk)
11:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Stop readding no consensual content in Resveratrol. Thank you.-- Nutriveg ( talk) 20:34, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Pushroll. Although it may have not been your intent, your article, " Resveratrol Lozenges", read like an advertisement. Here on Wikipedia, we have a policy in which advertising/spam is speedy deleted per deletion criterion G11. Please note that articles for deletion are judged on their own merit, not in comparison to other articles (See WP:OTHERSTUFF). You are certainly welcome to resubmit the article, but please revise the text so that it complies with the policies and guidelines noted at WP:ADS and WP:MOS; otherwise, you run the risk of having the article deleted again. FASTILY (TALK) 23:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
01:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
stop spamming —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.158.242 ( talk) 16:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the
external links you added do not comply with our
guidelines for external links and have been removed.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for
advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses
nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (
Mabidex (
talk)
23:46, 7 May 2010 (UTC))
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
-- Ronz ( talk) 02:17, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Resveratrol. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to
discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request
page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be
blocked from editing. --
Ronz (
talk)
02:20, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles . Please cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --
Ronz (
talk)
15:33, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
WP:DR describes the options for dealing with disputes. WP:NOR/N is probably the best venue for this situation. -- Ronz ( talk) 15:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Again, I encourage you to use proper dispute resolution. -- Ronz ( talk) 16:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Could you reword your comment here per WP:TALK. How about just removing the last sentence? -- Ronz ( talk) 20:05, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Please
do not attack other editors. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
[2] --
Ronz (
talk)
02:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)