Welcome!
Hello, Purplehayes2006, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Jenna Haze are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! Valrith 22:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Jenna Haze ( diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 16:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Looks like it's unfortunately time for admin action to enforce the guideline and consensus decision on Jenna Haze#External links. Please see Talk:Jenna_Haze#Ending_external_link_edit_war. -- AnonEMouse (squeak) 12:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
If you check the Wikipedia entry for OC Weekly which is the source for her name, you'll see that it is a weekly published paper. Tabercil 15:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, why did you revert the image on the page to the lower-quality one? Just curious. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
I just noticed you seem to be edit-warring on Jenna Haze. Please be aware of the WP:3RR policy, and discuss your concerns on the article's talk page to achieve consensus. It looks like you've already reverted three times in 24 hours, so if you revert again it could result in a block. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to
Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors
do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
∅ (
∅),
01:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree with the above. Every single one of your edits is to Jenna Haze. You do realize that there are more articles on Wikipedia don't you? -- 71.118.4.76 02:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I can, if you like, to avoid the IP editor editing. The IP made a point, you responded to it, so you clearly got the message; if you don't want it on your talk page that's your right. -- AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm a member of the XRCO but I have no idea why the award years are done retroactively. I know Dirty Bob (the head organizer) distinctly refers to the awards according to the calendar year of eligibility instead of the year it's given out. Did you confirm with Jenna what her award says? Even then, it's probably more correct to go with what AVN or XBIZ reports on. Vinh1313 ( talk) 17:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, please look over our external links guidelines, particularly the section on links to avoid. On Wikipedia we don't link to fansites unless the article is specifically about that fan site. Also, we don't link to myspace and twitter blogs unless there is no better official site to link to. If you think this particular article warrants an exception to our standing consensus, you can bring up a discussion about the links at the external links noticeboard and other editors will decide if the links are appropriate. Thanks, Them From Space 14:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Is it me or is it this individual seeming to running amok with inaccurate interpretations? Seems you have had a run in and so have I with his continued UNDOs without any forewarning or discussion.
who is this nutcase and how do we stop him? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Db54 ( talk • contribs) 22:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Purplehayes2006, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Jenna Haze are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! Valrith 22:04, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Jenna Haze ( diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 16:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Looks like it's unfortunately time for admin action to enforce the guideline and consensus decision on Jenna Haze#External links. Please see Talk:Jenna_Haze#Ending_external_link_edit_war. -- AnonEMouse (squeak) 12:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
If you check the Wikipedia entry for OC Weekly which is the source for her name, you'll see that it is a weekly published paper. Tabercil 15:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, why did you revert the image on the page to the lower-quality one? Just curious. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
I just noticed you seem to be edit-warring on Jenna Haze. Please be aware of the WP:3RR policy, and discuss your concerns on the article's talk page to achieve consensus. It looks like you've already reverted three times in 24 hours, so if you revert again it could result in a block. Videmus Omnia Talk 16:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to
Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please know that editors
do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, know that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -
∅ (
∅),
01:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I have to agree with the above. Every single one of your edits is to Jenna Haze. You do realize that there are more articles on Wikipedia don't you? -- 71.118.4.76 02:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
I can, if you like, to avoid the IP editor editing. The IP made a point, you responded to it, so you clearly got the message; if you don't want it on your talk page that's your right. -- AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm a member of the XRCO but I have no idea why the award years are done retroactively. I know Dirty Bob (the head organizer) distinctly refers to the awards according to the calendar year of eligibility instead of the year it's given out. Did you confirm with Jenna what her award says? Even then, it's probably more correct to go with what AVN or XBIZ reports on. Vinh1313 ( talk) 17:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, please look over our external links guidelines, particularly the section on links to avoid. On Wikipedia we don't link to fansites unless the article is specifically about that fan site. Also, we don't link to myspace and twitter blogs unless there is no better official site to link to. If you think this particular article warrants an exception to our standing consensus, you can bring up a discussion about the links at the external links noticeboard and other editors will decide if the links are appropriate. Thanks, Them From Space 14:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Is it me or is it this individual seeming to running amok with inaccurate interpretations? Seems you have had a run in and so have I with his continued UNDOs without any forewarning or discussion.
who is this nutcase and how do we stop him? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Db54 ( talk • contribs) 22:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)