Hello, Punditofnone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Don't Stop Believin' did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Panian513 23:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the
Triloknath Pandit article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site this statement (or something similar): "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License".
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Teahouse. You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- Yamla ( talk) 18:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Punditofnone ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I acknowledge that I inadvertently and without detail to attention added a sentence to the [[Triloknath Pandit]] article which in parts may have been the exact as it was mentioned in the referred source NY Times [1]. I acknowledge this was ethically and legally wrong and against the very spirit of rightful and open dissemination of knowledge. I guarantee full assurance from my end that this mistake, the lack of attention to detail will never happen again and I humbly request the chance to get my editorial privileges back. I have the utmost request for Copyright laws having professionally worked close to the domain and I deeply regret having inadvertently made this mistake. Wikipedia is sacred to me and I will be extremely disappointed if I won't have the chance to be an active part of the community again. It's only recently that I finally found the strength to transition from a voracious Wikipedia consumer to a contributor and I'd love to have the chance again to contribute to this community in an ethical, legal, and rightful manner. Many thanks for considering my request and for taking the time. Sincerely, Punditofnone[[User:Punditofnone|Punditofnone]] ([[User talk:Punditofnone#top|talk]]) 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I acknowledge that I inadvertently and without detail to attention added a sentence to the [[Triloknath Pandit]] article which in parts may have been the exact as it was mentioned in the referred source NY Times [1]. I acknowledge this was ethically and legally wrong and against the very spirit of rightful and open dissemination of knowledge. I guarantee full assurance from my end that this mistake, the lack of attention to detail will never happen again and I humbly request the chance to get my editorial privileges back. I have the utmost request for Copyright laws having professionally worked close to the domain and I deeply regret having inadvertently made this mistake. Wikipedia is sacred to me and I will be extremely disappointed if I won't have the chance to be an active part of the community again. It's only recently that I finally found the strength to transition from a voracious Wikipedia consumer to a contributor and I'd love to have the chance again to contribute to this community in an ethical, legal, and rightful manner. Many thanks for considering my request and for taking the time. Sincerely, Punditofnone[[User:Punditofnone|Punditofnone]] ([[User talk:Punditofnone#top|talk]]) 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I acknowledge that I inadvertently and without detail to attention added a sentence to the [[Triloknath Pandit]] article which in parts may have been the exact as it was mentioned in the referred source NY Times [1]. I acknowledge this was ethically and legally wrong and against the very spirit of rightful and open dissemination of knowledge. I guarantee full assurance from my end that this mistake, the lack of attention to detail will never happen again and I humbly request the chance to get my editorial privileges back. I have the utmost request for Copyright laws having professionally worked close to the domain and I deeply regret having inadvertently made this mistake. Wikipedia is sacred to me and I will be extremely disappointed if I won't have the chance to be an active part of the community again. It's only recently that I finally found the strength to transition from a voracious Wikipedia consumer to a contributor and I'd love to have the chance again to contribute to this community in an ethical, legal, and rightful manner. Many thanks for considering my request and for taking the time. Sincerely, Punditofnone[[User:Punditofnone|Punditofnone]] ([[User talk:Punditofnone#top|talk]]) 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:
- What is copyright?
- How is Wikipedia licenced?
- Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
- Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
- How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Punditofnone, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Don't Stop Believin' did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Panian513 23:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the
Triloknath Pandit article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept
copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site this statement (or something similar): "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License".
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Teahouse. You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- Yamla ( talk) 18:12, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Punditofnone ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I acknowledge that I inadvertently and without detail to attention added a sentence to the [[Triloknath Pandit]] article which in parts may have been the exact as it was mentioned in the referred source NY Times [1]. I acknowledge this was ethically and legally wrong and against the very spirit of rightful and open dissemination of knowledge. I guarantee full assurance from my end that this mistake, the lack of attention to detail will never happen again and I humbly request the chance to get my editorial privileges back. I have the utmost request for Copyright laws having professionally worked close to the domain and I deeply regret having inadvertently made this mistake. Wikipedia is sacred to me and I will be extremely disappointed if I won't have the chance to be an active part of the community again. It's only recently that I finally found the strength to transition from a voracious Wikipedia consumer to a contributor and I'd love to have the chance again to contribute to this community in an ethical, legal, and rightful manner. Many thanks for considering my request and for taking the time. Sincerely, Punditofnone[[User:Punditofnone|Punditofnone]] ([[User talk:Punditofnone#top|talk]]) 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I acknowledge that I inadvertently and without detail to attention added a sentence to the [[Triloknath Pandit]] article which in parts may have been the exact as it was mentioned in the referred source NY Times [1]. I acknowledge this was ethically and legally wrong and against the very spirit of rightful and open dissemination of knowledge. I guarantee full assurance from my end that this mistake, the lack of attention to detail will never happen again and I humbly request the chance to get my editorial privileges back. I have the utmost request for Copyright laws having professionally worked close to the domain and I deeply regret having inadvertently made this mistake. Wikipedia is sacred to me and I will be extremely disappointed if I won't have the chance to be an active part of the community again. It's only recently that I finally found the strength to transition from a voracious Wikipedia consumer to a contributor and I'd love to have the chance again to contribute to this community in an ethical, legal, and rightful manner. Many thanks for considering my request and for taking the time. Sincerely, Punditofnone[[User:Punditofnone|Punditofnone]] ([[User talk:Punditofnone#top|talk]]) 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I acknowledge that I inadvertently and without detail to attention added a sentence to the [[Triloknath Pandit]] article which in parts may have been the exact as it was mentioned in the referred source NY Times [1]. I acknowledge this was ethically and legally wrong and against the very spirit of rightful and open dissemination of knowledge. I guarantee full assurance from my end that this mistake, the lack of attention to detail will never happen again and I humbly request the chance to get my editorial privileges back. I have the utmost request for Copyright laws having professionally worked close to the domain and I deeply regret having inadvertently made this mistake. Wikipedia is sacred to me and I will be extremely disappointed if I won't have the chance to be an active part of the community again. It's only recently that I finally found the strength to transition from a voracious Wikipedia consumer to a contributor and I'd love to have the chance again to contribute to this community in an ethical, legal, and rightful manner. Many thanks for considering my request and for taking the time. Sincerely, Punditofnone[[User:Punditofnone|Punditofnone]] ([[User talk:Punditofnone#top|talk]]) 06:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:
- What is copyright?
- How is Wikipedia licenced?
- Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
- Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
- How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)