{{subst:submitdraft}}
to the top of the page)
My first time using the talk page, so excuse any errors. The reviewer suggests adding this entry (Wildlife Forensic Science) to an existing page. The existing page is not specified, but is presumably Forensic Science. However, that entry deals with human crime, whereas Wildlife Forensic Science employs unique methods to solve crimes, such as poaching and trade in endangered species, that violate wildlife protection laws. The only subheading that is partially relevant is Forensic Biology, but that entry is far less detailed than this entry on Wildlife Forensic Science, and also includes huaman-crime forensic disciplines, such as Forensic Anthropology and Forensic Dentistry. Therefore, I believe that Wildlife Forensic Science deserves a stand-alone entry, and that the submitted draft is appropriate (though, of course, it can be expanded over time). Will this response reach the reviewer of my entry, or is there another way to proceed? Thank you. Ptrail ( talk) 23:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wildlife Forensic Science, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 03:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Ptrail. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Wildlife Forensic Science.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wildlife Forensic Science}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 21:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Ptrail, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to
Wildlife forensic science has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RockMagnetist ( talk) 22:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I just received a message from RockMagnetist, with the crux being: "Your addition to Wildlife forensic science has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder." I have made no recent addition to this page, nor is it clear to me what copyrighted material is being referred to. Can you clarify, please? Pepper
{{subst:submitdraft}}
to the top of the page)
My first time using the talk page, so excuse any errors. The reviewer suggests adding this entry (Wildlife Forensic Science) to an existing page. The existing page is not specified, but is presumably Forensic Science. However, that entry deals with human crime, whereas Wildlife Forensic Science employs unique methods to solve crimes, such as poaching and trade in endangered species, that violate wildlife protection laws. The only subheading that is partially relevant is Forensic Biology, but that entry is far less detailed than this entry on Wildlife Forensic Science, and also includes huaman-crime forensic disciplines, such as Forensic Anthropology and Forensic Dentistry. Therefore, I believe that Wildlife Forensic Science deserves a stand-alone entry, and that the submitted draft is appropriate (though, of course, it can be expanded over time). Will this response reach the reviewer of my entry, or is there another way to proceed? Thank you. Ptrail ( talk) 23:34, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wildlife Forensic Science, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 03:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Ptrail. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Wildlife Forensic Science.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wildlife Forensic Science}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 21:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello Ptrail, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to
Wildlife forensic science has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without
permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RockMagnetist ( talk) 22:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
I just received a message from RockMagnetist, with the crux being: "Your addition to Wildlife forensic science has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder." I have made no recent addition to this page, nor is it clear to me what copyrighted material is being referred to. Can you clarify, please? Pepper